IntenseDebate - The Milk Mate

6 hours ago @ Crasstalk - Time for the Weekend O... · 0 replies · +4 points

Yeah I did, I'm sorry, I'm not trying to be mean or difficult, but there's four of them offering this up, if it was a singular source this would make sense, but all four? And the fact that campaigns have a lot of quid pro quo with the media when it comes to this stuff before it comes out, it makes it feel like I'm trying disprove a conspiracy theory. Drowning in what ifs.

11 hours ago @ Crasstalk - Time for the Weekend O... · 0 replies · +8 points

I'm sorry luck. :(

14 hours ago @ Crasstalk - Time for the Weekend O... · 0 replies · +6 points

After your actively aggressive dig, ya welcome!

15 hours ago @ Crasstalk - Time for the Weekend O... · 2 replies · +5 points

You literally said there is nothing I can say to change YOUR mind, but I'm the closed minded one.

Luckily the Democrat electorate seems to think that what Warren did was a political mistake given the debate exit pole and the Reuters general pole taken after the debate have Sanders surging to the lead. So I'm not completely crazy.

15 hours ago @ Crasstalk - Time for the Weekend O... · 4 replies · +6 points

And in the next paragraph in what I posted he mentions how well he did in key areas because of the movement he started. His point being that even though he is not African American, Latino or a woman, (although he is Jewish a minority, but irrelevant in this instance), he has a great advantage as a candidate because of the movement currently around him.

Hey you see what you want to see, you've made it implicit that Maxi or I can't say anything to change your mind.

16 hours ago @ Crasstalk - Time for the Weekend O... · 0 replies · +12 points

I can respect this opinion, if you just don't like someone because they rub you the wrong way that's life! It's the falsehoods and inaccuracies to pull people down that's when it gets absurd to me.

16 hours ago @ Crasstalk - Time for the Weekend O... · 2 replies · +7 points

So you're saying that four people, who were very close to / working with Warren at the time, had a conversation with her about the meeting, and then have since moved on, and all decided to drop that information to a CNN journalist?

16 hours ago @ Crasstalk - Time for the Weekend O... · 20 replies · +10 points

I read the article and even listened to the podcast to be absolutely sure I wasn't going crazy, and there was nothing there that is similar to the headline and CNN debate question /statement, "Sanders doesn't believe a woman can become president."

"But when I hear people, Democrats, independents talking, what they say mostly is we desperately must have a candidate who can defeat Donald Trump. And I think if you look at the 2016 election, if you look at areas where Secretary Clinton lost — in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Indiana — I think we are as strong, if not stronger, than any other Democratic candidate in winning those states.

Is this what you are talking about? Because this references the large left wing base he galvanized when he ran, and that he has grown and still has. Absolutely nothing to do with his gender.

17 hours ago @ Crasstalk - Time for the Weekend O... · 4 replies · +7 points

It can only be people who work in politics and closely with Warren. That's absolutely clear.

17 hours ago @ Crasstalk - Time for the Weekend O... · 29 replies · +8 points

https://fair.org/home/cnns-sanders-hit-piece-does...
Four people are listed as sources. People who had to have been told by Warren directly that that was what happened as all four were not there. Two who knew about the meeting (staffers) and two who talked to her afterwards (friends of Warren or staffers).

IntenseDebate Comment System

Description

Connect with The Milk Mate

People I'm following

Last 5 visitors

The Milk Mate