Matt Galligan
- Rep: 29pWhat's this?
Recent profile visitors
donnacha
- Rep: 0pWhat's this?
Zyxel Diesel
- Rep: 17pWhat's this?
AriesHungary
- Rep: 1pWhat's this?
Cameron Schaefer
- Rep: 26pWhat's this?
- Blog: Schaefer's Blog
Greg Reinacker
- Rep: 13pWhat's this?
- Blogs (2):
- Greg Reinacker's Weblog

Advertisement
- Following 20 people total
- |
- View all
Following
David G. Cohen
- Rep: 68pWhat's this?
- Blog: Colorado Startups
- |
- Blog RSS
Josh Fraser
- Rep: 39pWhat's this?
- Blog: Online Aspect
- |
- Blog RSS
Ari Newman
- Rep: 4pWhat's this?
- Blogs (4):
- The NVA Blog

gwenbell
- Rep: 65pWhat's this?
- Blog: Gwen Bell Dot Com
- |
- Blog RSS
arinewman
- Rep: 39pWhat's this?
- Blogs (2):
- the nva blog


Last 5 comments by Matt Galligan
One is that Ben and I (the founders) are pretty young (just turned 24). By having an early success (and being acquired by a large company, such as AOL) is huge for our careers. Now whenever we start some other company (in the future) we will have an easier time picking up VC funding for that company.
Beyond that, usually you've got three options for running a company...raise tons of cash, get cash flow positive or exit. Unfortunately our business doesn't really easily get to cash flow positive quickly. Because of that, we were stuck raising cash. Now granted, we didn't need a ton of it, but we did need some. The more investment you pull in, the less percentage you have in the company, and the more difficult (more expensive) it is to sell the company.
There's a whole lot of things that you have to weigh in on to really decide what kind of outcome is meaningful to you...in this case it was a really meaningful exit for all of us in the company, and meant that we could keep working on our product without the pressures of raising money or running a business.
Make sense?