343 comments posted · 11 followers · following 12
In other words, do I need some help?
They settled on, "the first African-American from any country!"
My anecdotal evidence is based upon ten years working in bookstores. And I'm not trying to prove anything based upon it. I don't understand why my questioning one of the underpinnings of Whiskey's argument is unacceptable. I believe that factual claims should be true. The types of generalizations Whiskey likes to use are things like "women are left-wing" and "most women are anti-Christian," yet he never bothers to back up those generalizations with any kind of data. What possible insights could come from false generalizations?
El Gordo, you don't understand the way Whiskey works. He doesn't look at data and come up with a theory, he has a preconception and makes up data to support it. (Chris E. has told me I mustn't call that lying. It's---I don't know---promoting faleshoods.)
What "insights" can be based on not having read (or comprehended) the books? Or from "generalizations" such as 'women are left-wingers' or 'most women are anti-Christian?' I can't imagine that they'd be of any value.
"Control of fear, acceptance of death and loss, sticking to the right thing, of honor, of duty, and so on, even when they are very difficult and emotionally draining." Whiskey characterizes these themes as "male" and thus foreign to the Harry Potter universe. That's simply incorrect, and laughably so, to anyone who has read the books. I'm surprised that you think Whiskey's "on-the-mark" about this, given that you admit you haven't read them, but I don't have a problem with the rest of what you've said.. But it's clear that Whiskey himself is unfamiliar with the books, their themes, and their readership, and he's making himself look foolish by making these unfounded claims.