892 comments posted · 11 followers · following 10
So I have to wonder why she accepted the Margaret Sanger Award from Planned Parenthood in 2009. Why would she align herself with the name of a socialist and eugenicist that advocated the genocide of Americans of African heritage?
Of course, Clinton’s being another Alinskyite explains the socialist bit. And it doesn’t take too much “Newthink” to accept Sanger was a “champion” of women’s rights. But with the President aligning so much of black America with the Democrat party, why would Secretary Clinton promote Sanger or Planned Parenthood by accepting this award? Dr Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King, recently suggested Planned Parenthood is even now engaged in genocide of black Americans through abortion. Once Rev Jesse Jackson raised concerns black Americans were targeted through abortion, that is until he ran for the Democrat presidential nomination.
It could be Clinton’s merely demonstrating the arrogance of power so prevalent among our rulers, er, representatives today; or her confidence in revisionism, that Americans are unaware of Sanger’s extremism. Revisionism could explain why black Americans would even consider voting for the historical party of slavery, the Democrats. We have forgotten.
When questioned of her accepting the Sanger award before a congressional committee, she equated Sanger’s racism with Thomas Jefferson’s owning slaves. Those “racist” founders again. This typifies the revision of our history, as we don’t know of great abolitionist founders like Benjamin Rush and John Witherspoon, or George Mason, the ‘father of the bill of rights’.
In one of the debates for the 2008 Democrat nomination, Hillary Clinton described herself as a progressive like those of the early twentieth century. This helps explain her praise for Sanger, because those early progressives embraced eugenics as well. But then, Hitler did too.
I will die first. Bring it on.
I am American.
Federal finance bill empowers bureaucrats
The new financial bill expands and empowers the bureaucracy to create new regulations that will limit commerce as the bureaucrats justify their own jobs. This heavy government footprint in our economy will prevent prosperity.
As the Heritage Foundation pointed out, this bill is a boon to lawyers, lobbyists, and big business that will breed more corruption. They will use campaign contributions to influence the drafting of regulations; an influence that has historically been to the detriment of small businesses unable and less inclined to finance this influence.
In these new regulations, we can expect more like the EPA's recent determination that milk producers must meet regulations for oil drillers by ruling animal fat the equal to petroleum. The same agency that recently threatened one third of our refinery capacity, insisting they are bound by the Supreme Court's comment on carbon dioxide. Neither of these authorities is elected.
This governance by appointed administrators over elected representatives has been the liberal Democrats' form of rule since Woodrow Wilson. The true danger of this bill, like so many others, is the abandonment of our republic to dictators, by substituting administrators for legislators.
Buried in the Dodd-Frank Act is a requirement for companies to prove their products contain no materials from the Congo, to prevent profit from exploitative labor practices and financing tyrannical governments. Yet, due to the moratorium on oil drilling in the Gulf, idled oil rigs are now setting sail for the Congo. Therein lies the lunacy of our own tyrannical government.
Then we, and our children may thrive.
I will not stand down from impeaching Obama and the liberal judges.
You cannot deny they are thwarting the Constitution; that demands impeachment.
Rise up! Demand it.
I have registered five voters, and I will register more.
I suggest they consider Marco Rubio,
but they know I will not stop until liberty is understood to be first.
but appreciate when we do give it all.
And grant the same for others.