NervousElk

NervousElk

61p

222 comments posted · 1 followers · following 4

2 days ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: The new Preside... · 0 replies · +1 points

Please pause for a moment and think about what you have posted.

2 days ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: The new Preside... · 0 replies · +1 points

How?

2 days ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: The new Preside... · 0 replies · +1 points

Yes, it's called Covid and a fear of reckless demagoguery.

2 days ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: The new Preside... · 0 replies · +1 points

Really? In what way? Go for it - actually give us the policies you believe make them so left wing please rather than just saying that Biden administration is very left wing.

2 days ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: The new Preside... · 0 replies · +1 points

Except that you weren't. You were just peddling a lot of nonsense implying that people weren't there because Biden hadn't really won the election. Criticise policies by all means if you disagree with them (I'm know I shall have a fair few to disagree with) but you need to do better than a post like that if you expect to be taken seriously.

3 days ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: The new Preside... · 5 replies · +1 points

I honesty have no idea why you persist in believing that Biden and his "comrades" as you put them are socialists, let alone communists. Sanders is a socialist, absolutely, but happily he is from the other end of their party. You might as well accuse Sir John Redwood of being a europhile wet on that basis...

As for your concerns about commitment to truth, well they have a very, very low base to start from and I cannot imagine that even in most peoples' worst nightmares they can be less committed to veracity than the recently departed incumbent.

Your comments on their being at best suckers for rapists, however, make we wonder if you are actually willing to engage with these points. In what possible real world, outside QAnon, is there remotely any evidence for that please?

3 days ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: The new Preside... · 0 replies · +1 points

Actually, yes - as Edmund. Although I always felt sorry for Edmund in some ways, which I certainly do not do with Trump.

3 days ago @ http://www.conservativ... - WATCH: The new Preside... · 2 replies · +1 points

That's your first and second comments on ConHome since you set up your account. I'm sure you're not American - Russian, perhaps?

2 weeks ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Auto-rant, bullshit an... · 0 replies · +1 points

Well said and perfectly put. I agree with every word.

3 weeks ago @ http://www.conservativ... - In 2021 the Union is i... · 0 replies · +1 points

That is an absurd comparison. No one is carting Ms Sturgeon off to a gulag or banishing her into exile and SNP activists aren’t being rounded up, beaten or arbitrarily detained. The USSR and the colonies of the empire didn’t hold legally binding referenda on independence either.

You are also twisting history to make your case. The fusion of the Scots of Argyll with the Picts and the conquest of the British of Strathclyde created Scotland about a thousand years ago (just as England was forged, by the sword, from the ashes of the Heptarchy and the Danelaw) but the Hen Ogledd (The Old North) had existed long before that and united through a common language (Cumbric) people living from the Clyde to the Mersey, the Forth to the Humber. Even the very word Scot means an Irishman of Dalriada, which is why Scottish Gaelic is a derivative of Goidelic Irish and not the original indigenous language that some of its proponents like to claim.

I’m not for a moment suggesting that Scotland is not a separate nation of the UK, with a different history and tradition from other parts of the Union but this idea that the peoples of what are now Scotland and England have always been separate and apart until the wicked Act of Union in 1707 came along is simply not true.