Henry Dubb
27p23 comments posted · 2 followers · following 2
17 years ago @ http://www.votenader.org/ - FSTV Video from Denver... · 1 reply · +1 points
17 years ago @ http://www.votenader.org/ - FSTV Video from Denver... · 0 replies · +1 points
Even through a sub woofer the sound was low. If someone was listening with headphones or cheap speakers they probably could not hear it. Was the audio source poor? I downloaded a copy for my Apple TV, and the quality was still pretty bad. A higher quality audio version would be wonderful.
17 years ago @ http://www.votenader.org/ - FSTV Video from Denver... · 0 replies · +1 points
Funny story. 2000 proves your theory long. Exactly what you argue Nader voters should have done, they did.
In Midwest and southern states Nader got between 2-4% of the popular vote.In Florida he got only a bit past 1%. Many potential Nader voters supported Gore even though he was moving to the right (sound familiar) and he still lost. Florida was one of Nader's worst performing states in 2000.
17 years ago @ http://www.votenader.org/ - Drop a Four Spot for t... · 0 replies · +1 points
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids...
17 years ago @ http://www.votenader.org/ - Nader on ABC’s T... · 0 replies · +1 points
The one critique I have is that he did not mention the big O voting against a 30% interest rate cap. You can't on the one hand "talk " about the disasters of sub prime lending, while also voting against this cap. The very definition of sub prime is interest rates exceeding 30%.
FYI, I recently was on a Sirius show called Blog Bunker. The interview was about socialism, Nader, lesser evilism etc. I was really caught off guard by the complete angst about Nader.
http://proletariat.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/blog-...
17 years ago @ Thomasina Paine - The Human Bond of Duh · 0 replies · +1 points
17 years ago @ http://www.votenader.org/ - What's Your Breaking P... · 1 reply · +1 points
17 years ago @ http://www.votenader.org/ - Old Obama, New Obama -... · 0 replies · +1 points
The response to being a spoiler should be, yea isn't that the purpose. In a plurality based system, participation is spoiling. Why is there an attempt to somehow pacify the lesser evil fear tactics with "spoiler free" scams.
I certainly hope that Nader changes his mind on this votepac.
17 years ago @ http://www.votenader.org/ - VotePact -- Ralph Nade... · 0 replies · +1 points
17 years ago @ http://www.votenader.org/ - VotePact -- Ralph Nade... · 0 replies · +2 points
Maybe I don't get it, what's the purpose of being in the race you went to spoiler proof it. The mere aspect of participating as a candidate makes the election spoilable. Please take this stupid idea from where it came from.