I think IE pony mod might have taken the role playing a little too far.
I usually use modded versions of Fire Fox. I only switch to Chrome for a few things that bug in FF, and Opera for downloads.
IE doesn't tend to react well to the amount of tabs I usually have open.

Supercharged Celestia could ask Twilight to do a dangerous task with much more gravitas.

I for one salute our Megachiropteran overlord.

Also, why not both, with bonus shipping. Luna and Flutterbat would be adorable together.

The best part of that head cannon is that ponies eating meat would be very taboo. It would be like the stories told of Caligula or Vladimir the Impaler.

If nothing else the SJWs are media savvy. All those communications and English degrees are useful after all. They are in a position to control the narrative in the media and social media as they have ties to people (both personal and ideological) to people in these areas.
Manipulation of ideas is part of the radical feminist (and related ideologies) modus operandi. It is not surprising that they are better at it than a disorganised group of people that are not specialised in that area. They can frame anything they do as "social justice" ,which to the average observer is positive, and frame any criticism as being misogyny, racism etc. Compassionate people have a tendency to side with the underdog, whether that's people who are disabled, gay, a different race, women, etc. SJWs use this to their advantage, by turning everything into "oppression" that they need to be protected from and framing their own bigotry as "venting" against their "oppressor".
But clearly we are both cis-gendered heterosexual non-disabled(kek) white men, so our opinions are worthless because we are horrible republican voting oppressors. I'm actually only two of the things on that list, and not American, but that wouldn't stop the claim.

You can always play the game SJW or Stormfront. Fun for the whole family. Just redact a few words that would give it away.

There's actually a blog on Tumblr (social justice Hitler) that rewords statements by SJWs and Hitler (et al.) to see if people can tell the difference. It's run by a Jewish woman, suprisingly.

"Couldn't care less" is the phrase you are looking for.
His actions were not reflective of the opinions of Hasbro and IDW and by expressing those opinions (via insertion of a friends OC) in a work published on behalf of Hasbro by IDW he has gotten himself fired. If he aired his anti-brony/anti-male sentiment outside of his job and not in a context that reflected on that of his employer (such as a convention) and was fired for it, then it may be an issue of free speech. Regardless free speech is a protection from government intervention, not from criticism or repercussions based on what you have said. If he had not brought his personal views into his work he probably would have received at worst a stern talking to.
The criticism of Derpygate were not that things that are offensive should not be censored (remembering this is a child friendly show) but that it is generally not offensive nor intended to be offensive. A further issue, at least for many disabled people including myself, was that by censoring a character that (inadvertently) appeared to be disabled they were one of the few characters that is like us. Given that we are excluded and marginalised both in media and in our daily lives this is something that we are quite sensitive about. I've come across stories of quite a few disabled children that were quite hurt by her being censored. I was also pretty upset by it.
Imagine that instead of talking ponies we were talking about a cartoon in the 80s. That cartoon puts a black character on television, something that was unusual in the 80s, which is criticised by some people for being a stereotype of black people. This was not intended to be a stereotype at all, and in response that character is edited to be more "normal". You can imagine how heart broken all the black kids would be about having a character that they could relate to being removed. In either case is not to remove the character, but to improve how that character is presented in the future. Imagine that instead of removing Derpy they instead brought her back as a character that has trouble doing things, but with help and hard work she is able to help other ponies around Ponyville. Instead of a positive episode about disability (not that Hasbro would touch that subject) we got censorship.

I never liked Molestia and never followed that blog. Given that I'm following nearly 1000blogs lets just say that it's unusual for me not to follow a popular pony blog. While I did not like the blog, it was a parody of MLP and thus fair usage, and complied with Tumblrs terms. Talk of it being pornographic or "rapey", well Tumblr may be known for SJWs but it is also well known for its porn. If there are blogs with pictures of hardcore BDSM and fetishes such as urolagnia then I think a naughty pony princess isn't going to cause much of a stir. Molestia was targeted simply because it raised the ire of a few radical feminists who managed to organise a group of like minded people. Now you could just put this down as repercussions of creating a blog about something that upsets people, not above criticism and all that. The problem is the person that started it had herself been making pony porn while attacking others on that basis. Since she was a minor at the time it was also illegal for her to do so. There were also alleged to be some pictures that she had drawn that included rape. Others that were attacking Molestia also had a history of drawing pony porn. It was attacked simply because they did not like it, they were jealous of J J and/or it made them look good to do so. The hypocrisy of the SJW.

You can almost hear them saying "Kill me!".

Lonely socially awkward gamer woona.
I'm sure she could be behind the times and in canterlock mode at the same time. Have her discover games while trying to catch up with modern technology and going all canterlock at noobs.

In Soviet Equestria, cake eats you!