christopher 164

christopher 164

55p

148 comments posted · 2 followers · following 30

3 years ago @ http://www.ceilingfanp... - The Ceiling Fan Podcas... · 0 replies · +2 points

What's up with you these days?

3 years ago @ http://www.ceilingfanp... - The Ceiling Fan Podcas... · 4 replies · +1 points

Makes me sad . . . I love you Ceiling Fan . . .

4 years ago @ The Inner Tube - Inner Tube Community -... · 1 reply · +2 points

Wow, thanks for including my comparison thingy in your tops! That's an honor!

A ton of dedication you have for reading all these comments! :DDD

4 years ago @ http://www.ceilingfanp... - The Ceiling Fan Podcas... · 4 replies · +2 points

Ahh! "Whit's End" has passed 1,000 streams on Spotify!!! :DDD

5 years ago @ http://www.ceilingfanp... - The Ceiling Fan Podcas... · 1 reply · +3 points

6 years ago @ The Inner Tube - Inner Tube Community -... · 3 replies · +2 points

I saw that Kevin McCreary’s “Do You Believe” review was taken down. Let me explain how it all works.

What Is Content ID?

So, the company of a movie (or any media product) can upload the “Reference File” on YouTube and hide it (I guess they use the unlist option), but it has some special layer on it or something. It’s called “Content ID.” It pretty much prohibits the content to be re-uploaded on YouTube.

But the thing is that the company can do three things when they find a match of their video uploaded and another video uploaded. They can #1 take it down (like with this and the “Fireproof” review) #2 monetize it (like the “God’s Not Dead” review) or #3 track the stats.

So, Kevin were talking on the Inner Tube about your right for free speech. And I agree with that. The only thing I don’t really agree with that excuse to do these reviews is that Kevin go thru the whole entire video, making it unnecessary for the viewer to purchase the video.

There’s two things, in my mind, that can categorize Kevin’s reviews: #1 a (satire) review and #2 an illegal uploading. Yes, Kevin reviews it, but he also presents the whole movie to the viewer.

If one was to take down Kevin’s “Old Fashioned” review (which is a real review), then they aren’t doing it right. Kevin have the right to review it and to show the trailer (or even select clips from the movie). And if they take it down (especially if they don’t like the review, even though that one was positive), they are violating Kevin’s right to free speech. (And if anyone starts speaking about homosexuality but gets arrested, then their right to free speech is being violated.)

But with all the other reviews, it’s a little questionable if it’s an illegal uploading or a review. It’s a tough line to define.

So, just wanted to give you all some of the information. Hopefully Kevin won’t get sued!

Christopher Patti, OSF, South Korea.

6 years ago @ The Inner Tube - Inner Tube Community -... · 1 reply · +1 points

Okay, so click on "Blog Settings." There are two drop down thingies that read "Post Header/Footer Code." In each one, you can enter in your stuff.

6 years ago @ The Inner Tube - Inner Tube Community -... · 0 replies · +1 points

If you click on Blog settings, then there’s “Insert {Blog} Header Code.” Don’t get confused with the header code of each page. What I do is do a blockquote tag to give the text more flavor. Disagree? Try text plain. (There’s also blog button code.)
As I’m writing this, I’m offline. So I haven’t memorized the settings. But it’s on one of those settings pages. If I remember to when I post this comment, I’ll go double check.

6 years ago @ http://www.ceilingfanp... - The Ceiling Fan Podcas... · 1 reply · +1 points

Wow, that's so cool! How did you know?

6 years ago @ The Inner Tube - Inner Tube Community -... · 2 replies · +1 points

It's been a long time since I've been here.