rsgranne
92p1,338 comments posted · 3 followers · following 0
11 years ago @ Scott Granneman's... - STUDY: Women and Wikip... · 0 replies · +1 points
http://wu.granneman.com/2012/02/24/very-pinterest...
And elsewhere:
http://www.quora.com/What-proportion-of-active-Pi...
http://www.wired.com/business/2012/09/pinterest-p...
http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/justin-bieber/picks/s...
http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/04/05/the-wo...
Wikipedia is the LARGEST encyclopedia in the WORLD. The fact that almost none of the editors of that site are women is not just newsworthy—it’s a big PROBLEM.
And equality has nothing to do with it. In fact, because they are equal, women should be participating much more on Wikipedia.
11 years ago @ Scott Granneman's... - Wikipedia vs. Britanni... · 0 replies · +1 points
If I’m reading about mass killings & want to really investigate the history of them, Wikipedia makes it far easier. That’s why people sometimes get "lost" in Wikipedia—they start reading about 1 thing & look up 3 hours later after reading 50 other Wikipedia articles that were linked from the original!
11 years ago @ Scott Granneman's... - So, what is a CMS? · 0 replies · +1 points
RE: authoring—sure, they’re (mostly) easy to author in. But that’s for the non-nerds doing the content. The nerds have to do all the back-end stuff, and yes, that’s far more complicated.
11 years ago @ Scott Granneman's... - Writing sensible email... · 0 replies · +1 points
11 years ago @ Scott Granneman's... - Adults Are Not So Incl... · 0 replies · +1 points
11 years ago @ Scott Granneman's... - Become a Skype power u... · 0 replies · +1 points
You should like a web developer from 10 years ago: "Everyone is using IE. I prefer IE. So I shall design only for IE."
This is called the network effect: the more people who use a technology to communicate, the more attractive the technology becomes.
11 years ago @ Scott Granneman's... - The Best PC for the Money · 0 replies · +1 points
11 years ago @ Scott Granneman's... - Facebook's Eroding Pri... · 0 replies · +1 points
Let me quote from an article to explain what I mean by that last sentence. it’s from an article by John Siracusa about ebooks (http://wu.granneman.com/2009/02/01/the-once-and-future-e-book-on-reading-in-the-digital-age/):
"Time and again this happens, and it can happen without changing a single person’s mind. To put it bluntly, people die. Indeed, death is arguably the single most important driver for all human progress. Even in a community as reason-based as science, it’s often necessary to wait for one generation of scientists to die off before a new theory gains mainstream acceptance. It’s a bit much to hold consumers’ text-based media preferences to a higher standard.
So, death and the passage of time — hardly romantic. It doesn’t have to be that way, of course. Plenty of new technologies gain widespread adoption without the aid of a generational turnover. But so far, books have held their ground. The message here is simply that, on the long graph, the result will be the same.
The next generation, though influenced by the prejudices of their parents, are nevertheless more likely to judge new technologies on their merits, and so on for each new generation. And in the case of e-books, the merits are there, as plain as day. In fact, they’re some of the same merits that have driven other successful media transitions.
…
Lather, rinse, repeat. Did you ride a horse to work today? I didn’t. I’m sure plenty of people swore they would never ride in or operate a ‘horseless carriage’ — and they never did! And then they died."
You & many others like you will never use social media. And then you will die. And sometime in the future, almost everyone will use social media, just as almost everyone now uses a computer, or a car, or a TV.
11 years ago @ Scott Granneman's... - Social networks (Fall ... · 0 replies · +1 points
11 years ago @ Scott Granneman's... - Beckstrom's Law · 0 replies · +1 points