<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/639052</link>
		<description>Comments by rsgranne</description>
<item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : STUDY: Women and Wikipedia Don’t Mix</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2009/09/01/study-women-and-wikipedia-dont-mix/#IDComment529722276</link>
<description>Sure you do. On THIS SITE.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://wu.granneman.com/2012/02/24/very-pinterest-ing/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://wu.granneman.com/2012/02/24/very-pinterest...&lt;/a&gt;  And elsewhere:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quora.com/What-proportion-of-active-Pinterest-users-are-women&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.quora.com/What-proportion-of-active-Pi...&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/business/2012/09/pinterest-popularity/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.wired.com/business/2012/09/pinterest-p...&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/justin-bieber/picks/show/463349&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/justin-bieber/picks/s...&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/04/05/the-world-according-to-justin-bieber/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/04/05/the-wo...&lt;/a&gt;  Wikipedia is the LARGEST encyclopedia in the WORLD. The fact that almost none of the editors of that site are women is not just newsworthy&amp;mdash;it&amp;rsquo;s a big PROBLEM.   And equality has nothing to do with it. In fact, because they are equal, women should be participating much more on Wikipedia.    </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2009/09/01/study-women-and-wikipedia-dont-mix/#IDComment529722276</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Wikipedia vs. Britannica Smackdown</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2004/09/07/wikipedia-vs-britannica-smackdown/#IDComment529718486</link>
<description>EB is often wrong. Wikipedia has an article about errors in EB. Those take time to fix. Wikipedia&amp;rsquo;s are fixed immediately.  If I&amp;rsquo;m reading about mass killings &amp;amp; want to really investigate the history of them, Wikipedia makes it far easier. That&amp;rsquo;s why people sometimes get &amp;quot;lost&amp;quot; in Wikipedia&amp;mdash;they start reading about 1 thing &amp;amp; look up 3 hours later after reading 50 other Wikipedia articles that were linked from the original! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2004/09/07/wikipedia-vs-britannica-smackdown/#IDComment529718486</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : So, what is a CMS?</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2003/06/01/so-what-is-a-cms/#IDComment529716935</link>
<description>Re: workflows&amp;mdash;in some organizations, you want persons A &amp;amp; B to write, but their work must be approved by C before it is published. Like it or not, that&amp;rsquo;s how some places do it. Makes sense, so you want a CMS that allows that.  RE: authoring&amp;mdash;sure, they&amp;rsquo;re (mostly) easy to author in. But that&amp;rsquo;s for the non-nerds doing the content. The nerds have to do all the back-end stuff, and yes, that&amp;rsquo;s far more complicated. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2003/06/01/so-what-is-a-cms/#IDComment529716935</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Writing sensible email messages</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2005/09/19/writing-sensible-email-messages/#IDComment529715417</link>
<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruft&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruft&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=crufty&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cr...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2005/09/19/writing-sensible-email-messages/#IDComment529715417</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Adults Are Not So Inclined to Check In</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2010/11/28/adults-are-not-so-inclined-to-check-in/#IDComment529714656</link>
<description>Just like my other comment. You may never use a cell phone. And then one die you will die. And soon, everyone will use a cell phone (or the equivalent, whatever that is.) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2010/11/28/adults-are-not-so-inclined-to-check-in/#IDComment529714656</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Become a Skype power user with our 7 must-know secrets</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2012/11/08/become-a-skype-power-user-with-our-7-must-know-secrets/#IDComment529713998</link>
<description>No, you are not understanding what I am saying. What happens when your uncle, or your friend, or your boss, or your client wants to vid-chat with you &amp;amp; they don&amp;rsquo;t use Apple products? It&amp;rsquo;s great that right NOW the only person you wish to chat with has an iPad. But what about later? Are you just going to say to the client, &amp;quot;Sorry. You&amp;rsquo;re an inferior creature. No chat for you.&amp;quot; That would be rather foolish.  You should like a web developer from 10 years ago: &amp;quot;Everyone is using IE. I prefer IE. So I shall design only for IE.&amp;quot;   This is called the network effect: the more people who use a technology to communicate, the more attractive the technology becomes.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2012/11/08/become-a-skype-power-user-with-our-7-must-know-secrets/#IDComment529713998</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : The Best PC for the Money</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2006/09/13/the-best-pc-for-the-money/#IDComment529705371</link>
<description>Great advice, Vincent! Thank you! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2006/09/13/the-best-pc-for-the-money/#IDComment529705371</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Facebook&#039;s Eroding Privacy Policy: A Timeline</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2010/04/28/facebooks-eroding-privacy-policy-a-timeline/#IDComment526946265</link>
<description>And you probably will never use it. Or any social media. And you will die.   Let me quote from an article to explain what I mean by that last sentence. it&amp;rsquo;s from an article by John Siracusa about ebooks  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://wu.granneman.com/2009/02/01/the-once-and-future-e-book-on-reading-in-the-digital-age/):&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;(http://wu.granneman.com/2009/02/01/the-once-and-future-e-book-on-reading-in-the-digital-age/):&lt;/a&gt;  &amp;quot;Time and again this happens, and it can happen without changing a single person&amp;rsquo;s mind. To put it bluntly, people die. Indeed, death is arguably the single most important driver for all human progress. Even in a community as reason-based as science, it&amp;rsquo;s often necessary to wait for one generation of scientists to die off before a new theory gains mainstream acceptance. It&amp;rsquo;s a bit much to hold consumers&amp;rsquo; text-based media preferences to a higher standard.  So, death and the passage of time &amp;mdash; hardly romantic. It doesn&amp;rsquo;t have to be that way, of course. Plenty of new technologies gain widespread adoption without the aid of a generational turnover. But so far, books have held their ground. The message here is simply that, on the long graph, the result will be the same.  The next generation, though influenced by the prejudices of their parents, are nevertheless more likely to judge new technologies on their merits, and so on for each new generation. And in the case of e-books, the merits are there, as plain as day. In fact, they&amp;rsquo;re some of the same merits that have driven other successful media transitions.  &amp;hellip;  Lather, rinse, repeat. Did you ride a horse to work today? I didn&amp;rsquo;t. I&amp;rsquo;m sure plenty of people swore they would never ride in or operate a &amp;lsquo;horseless carriage&amp;rsquo; &amp;mdash; and they never did! And then they died.&amp;quot;  You &amp;amp; many others like you will never use social media. And then you will die. And sometime in the future, almost everyone will use social media, just as almost everyone now uses a computer, or a car, or a TV. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 05:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2010/04/28/facebooks-eroding-privacy-policy-a-timeline/#IDComment526946265</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Social networks (Fall 2012)</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2012/11/06/social-networks-fall-2012/#IDComment526943996</link>
<description>Because it&amp;rsquo;s fun. If you never try it, how would you know?  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 05:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2012/11/06/social-networks-fall-2012/#IDComment526943996</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Beckstrom&#039;s Law</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2011/05/14/beckstroms-law/#IDComment526934713</link>
<description>Cynicism is cute, but not helpful. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 05:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2011/05/14/beckstroms-law/#IDComment526934713</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Beckstrom&#039;s Law</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2011/05/14/beckstroms-law/#IDComment526934296</link>
<description>Look at it from the opposite POV, as the article states: &amp;quot;It states that one way to contemplate the value the network adds to each transaction is to imagine the network being shut off and what the additional transactions costs or loss would be.&amp;quot; That brings a different perspective. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 05:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2011/05/14/beckstroms-law/#IDComment526934296</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : The Record Industry&#039;s Decline</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2007/06/19/the-record-industrys-decline/#IDComment526767409</link>
<description>Not free, but cheap. $10 a month for millions of songs is pretty f&amp;#039;ing cheap! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2007/06/19/the-record-industrys-decline/#IDComment526767409</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Prince: A Nation of Thieves?</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2002/08/07/prince-a-nation-of-thieves/#IDComment526767024</link>
<description>Spotify &amp;amp; Rdio are great, but you don&amp;rsquo;t own the music, &amp;amp; don&amp;rsquo;t have everything (Led Zeppelin, for instance, or The Beatles) available.   Also, downloading over the Net is not stealing. It is infringement. Taking the CD from a store is stealing. Those are legal definitions. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2002/08/07/prince-a-nation-of-thieves/#IDComment526767024</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Hollywood, Disney, and color TV adoption</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2002/06/12/hollywood-disney-and-color-tv-adoption/#IDComment526755969</link>
<description>You&amp;rsquo;ve NEVER watched a B&amp;amp;W movie? Ever?? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2002/06/12/hollywood-disney-and-color-tv-adoption/#IDComment526755969</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : The big DRM mistake</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2006/03/01/the-big-drm-mistake/#IDComment526755747</link>
<description>2 points:  1. Apple HAD to include the DRM to get the music co&amp;rsquo;s OK to sell the music. 2. Apple convinced the co&amp;rsquo;s to get rid of the DRM a few years ago. NONE of the music currently for sale is DRM&amp;rsquo;d. And you can replace all your old DRM&amp;#039;d songs with non-DRM&amp;rsquo;d ones easily. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2006/03/01/the-big-drm-mistake/#IDComment526755747</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Wikipedia vs. Britannica Smackdown</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2004/09/07/wikipedia-vs-britannica-smackdown/#IDComment525581152</link>
<description>Which makes EB less useful. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2004/09/07/wikipedia-vs-britannica-smackdown/#IDComment525581152</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : STUDY: Women and Wikipedia Don’t Mix</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2009/09/01/study-women-and-wikipedia-dont-mix/#IDComment525580607</link>
<description>You don&amp;#039;t think women bring a different perspective than men? Really? You don&amp;#039;t think it&amp;#039;s important for the world&amp;#039;s free encyclopedia to have more women editors?? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2009/09/01/study-women-and-wikipedia-dont-mix/#IDComment525580607</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : The many facets of a slightly flawed gem</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/1984/08/01/the-many-facets-of-a-slightly-flawed-gem/#IDComment525579129</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s here for historical reasons. How far we&amp;#039;ve come. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/1984/08/01/the-many-facets-of-a-slightly-flawed-gem/#IDComment525579129</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Die, discs, die! Six reasons to kill the DVD</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2011/07/26/die-discs-die-six-reasons-to-kill-the-dvd/#IDComment525578198</link>
<description>The future - and Apple - does not agree with you. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2011/07/26/die-discs-die-six-reasons-to-kill-the-dvd/#IDComment525578198</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Scott Granneman&#039;s Classes : Become a Skype power user with our 7 must-know secrets</title>
<link>http://wu.granneman.com/2012/11/08/become-a-skype-power-user-with-our-7-must-know-secrets/#IDComment525577570</link>
<description>No no no - I mean the OTHER people to whom you talk. If THEY don&amp;#039;t have Apple devices, then YOU cannot talk to them. But EVERYONE can use Skype, no matter what YOU or the OTHERS are using. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 08:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wu.granneman.com/2012/11/08/become-a-skype-power-user-with-our-7-must-know-secrets/#IDComment525577570</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>