IntenseDebate - Lantern

14 years ago @ http://vanishingameric... - Is this what it comes ... · 0 replies · +5 points

This Orwellian reality-denial really is quite something isn't it? Here in Britain there's ongoing cases of gangs of Muslim men who have groomed and raped underage white girls. Girls they have deliberately chosen because they are of a different ethnicity to themselves. This has been going on for years but the system has turned a blind-eye to it. Now the liberal media/establishment is telling us "that this is not a racial matter as most perpetrators are white" and "how its about class not race". Are we meant to believe that had the ethnicities been reversed, and gangs of white men had selected Muslim girls as targets for their lust, that this would no be a racially aggravated matter? What next? The Earth is flat and a table is a chair?
For some inexplicable reason these anti-reality cretins are the ones with the power. I can only ponder upon how the people get the government they deserve.

16 years ago @ London Patriot - More troubling times f... · 0 replies · +1 points

Good! Because I believe that before the BNP can win power through elections, it must first beat the media.

16 years ago @ London Patriot - The New BNP Constituti... · 1 reply · +1 points

I disagree dude. Peter Hitchens is an inveterate BNP hater and is quite proud of the fact. He will continue to drone on and on about about how the BNP are "thugs", "bigots", "neo-nazis" etc. Nothing in heaven or hell will change that. He knows full well that the violence affecting BNP events comes from the state sponsored leftist rentamob, but on this he chooses to remain silent. Neither will he concede the BNP any credit whatsoever on any issue. In common with the rest of the MSM, to Mr Hitchens everything the BNP says or does is always wrong. Now how can a single political party, be 100% wrong 100% of the time? It's absurd.
With that fact in mind, who cares about his opinions or those of of the MSM anyway? He flatters himself that if the BNP ever came to power he would have to "jump on a plane and leave the country". But why? He's just another establishment scribbler and not at all important.

16 years ago @ The Green Arrow - LYING TROUBLEMAKER EJE... · 0 replies · +1 points

Not to mention the clawhammer attack on your good self and the staged UAF violence against Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons on College Green.

16 years ago @ The Green Arrow - LYING TROUBLEMAKER EJE... · 0 replies · +3 points

I see the red scum have landed in force on the Times comments section. Either that or they are filtering out pro BNP posts.

16 years ago @ The Green Arrow - LYING TROUBLEMAKER EJE... · 0 replies · +2 points

Exactly Grumpygit. Everything the BNP ever says or does will always be wrong for the media. I am sick to the back teeth with them. They are a far greater enemy than either Nu Liebore, Tories or the Lib-Dems. They are congenital liars and twisters who cost us VOTES. That is their function. My only interest in the media is seeing it smashed.

16 years ago @ London Patriot - Andrew (how superior a... · 1 reply · +2 points

The BNPs enemy isn't so much Nu Labour, Lib-Dems or the Conservatives. It is the liberal establishment. The BNP are trying, prematurely in my view, to take on these parties, but the retaliation is from the entire combined establishment. It is dirty, brutal, disproportionate and orchestrated. Sure, if you're the say, the Lib-Dems, Tories or Greens, then yes, you are simply fighting other parties and that's it. However, with the BNP it has become evident that this is not the case.
If the BNP does not do well at the general election, I would like to see it have a sabbatical from elections and concentrate all its fire on the mainstream media. These are the opinion formers who provide the sources of (dis)information upon which people vote.

I've just finished reading a very good book about the Normandy Invasion and the role played by the 2nd Tactical Air Force. It was realised that there was no point in attempting to invade France without first having gained air superiority. I am of the opinion that there is no point in fighting elections until the mass-media have been comprehensively trashed. They must be reduced in the publics perception to the level of Lord Haw Haw. At present the BNP have landed, but are being bombed to hell on the beaches.

16 years ago @ The Green Arrow - Anjem Choudary Intervi... · 1 reply · +1 points

I remember Nick Griffin being "interviewed" by Andrew Neil and his opening shot was "So who do you hate most Mr Griffin, Moslems or Jews?"

16 years ago @ The Green Arrow - Anjem Choudary Intervi... · 0 replies · +2 points

Agreed Peter. The guy was a nutter who got what he deserved. What is concerning me, and has done since the beginning of the week is this:

On Monday Islam4UK was banned under counter-terrorism laws. I began thinking....The establishment doctrine is that there are "extremists on both sides" This is set in stone. So if they ban Islam4UK, then logically they must find a reason to ban the BNP also, which they portray as being the other side of the coin. I was wondering how they could justify it with the BNPs lawful electoral campaigning and refusal to indulge in violence despite provocation. No terrorist links either unlike Islam4UK. Now on Friday we have this guy plastered across the media.....and with an election approaching how convenient - and what next?

16 years ago @ The Green Arrow - Anjem Choudary Intervi... · 1 reply · +1 points

I heared this news item on radio 2 during the afternoon (reported gleefully by the BBC). Now this evening I've been over to the BBC site and others, I can't find any trace of it. It just gets stranger and stranger.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Description

Connect with Lantern

People I'm following

Lantern