homeowners
89p228 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Fearing bad winter, Bo... · 2 replies · +15 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Hickenlooper pledges $... · 0 replies · +1 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Kerry Cooper: Folsom w... · 1 reply · +2 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Kerry Cooper: Folsom w... · 1 reply · +1 points
On Elmer's Two Mile you are protected from traffic all the way from Iris to Mapleton. From there you take 26th to Pine and Pine to 13th. Folsom is only protected from Canyon to Valmont.
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Kerry Cooper: Folsom w... · 11 replies · +11 points
Most of Folsom in fact doesn't have protective barrier. Plus, the barrier aren't really protective. I don't really believe they would stop a car.
It seems like a simpler approach to Folsom, would be to merge the original two (one north one south)bike lanes to one. Most bike paths in Boulder don't have two separate lanes for biking. Then put up concrete barriers between 4 lanes of traffic and bike path, with opening at intersection. This would also eliminate bikers and cars crossing each other at intersections. I can not see bikers or drivers having and issue with this plan
Just curious are there any living lab projects West of Broadway?
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Jean Abbott and Emily ... · 0 replies · +14 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Bob Greenlee: Should o... · 2 replies · +21 points
Amsterdam also has a large network of canals, which they use in the winter for skating instead of biking.
Seems like your selective very selective and only see what you wish to see in the report.
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Residents of Boulder\'... · 5 replies · +12 points
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Residents of Boulder\'... · 0 replies · +16 points
The city signed an agreement with the neighborhood 20 years ago to allow a limited number of commuters. This was to allow the city time to find a long term solution for parking. In those 20 year the NPP management has done nothing to find solutions. They've instead doubled the number of commuter permits.
Molly's word like many other city employees are pure fiction. The NPP management chooses to turn a blind eye to over parking. She like many other in the city government ignore residents of the neighborhood and work for the benefit of commercial developers.
Under the agreement the NPP management was to maintain "livable " family neighborhoods. Instead Molly and her team prefer to provide cheap parking for commuters and employees. This increases the profits for the city and for commercial developers.
The city's state goal is to reduce traffic into downtown and increase mass transit ridership. Instead NPP management has doubled the number of commuters into downtown and on our side streets.
10 years ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Virtual Editorial Boar... · 0 replies · +1 points
It that really true or does city preach mass transit and limiting traffic while turning our neighborhoods into virtual parking lots?
The city would prefer to sell 350 parking spaces in our neighborhood and increase the profits of commercial developers to keeping our "neighborhood livability". For the city it's $11K per year profit. For the commercial developer it mean he can rent commercial space to more people and not supply places to park. They know the city will put the burden of parking on the neighborhoods. So city sides with commercial developers and leave families with no ability to park near their homes.
Question is how many commuter parking spaces did the city put in the Transit Village / Boulder Junction to help commuters make use of mass transit into downtown? The answer is zero.