274 comments posted · 10 followers · following 0
This Aberdeen Court's decision is merely a reflection of the McPherson report and his Stalinist bias being a continuation.
For more information on McPherson, read Frank Ellis's excellent report.
In the meantime, as we all know, the African and Asian races are having an average of 3 to 4 children per couple, thus doubling their population with every generation, roughly.
There is no doubt that the human animal is outbreeding its habitat and will move to pastures new to feed itself. Currently the new pastures are Europe but it won't be long before those pastures have been stripped of their resources.
As we are being hard hearted here, it is a stark fact that the human race needs to be culled in order for it to survive.
On a radio talk show recently, a woman from the anti smoking fascists was interviewed. As usual, the case of Roy Castle was used as her 'evidence'. Another caller asked this woman if it was correct that Roy Castle smoked cigars! Which he did. The anti smoking woman refused to answer the question.
That is an example of how people who are fanatical about a particular subject, whether it be 'global warming', now morphed into 'climate change or anti smoking etc, refuse to look at all the evidence, especially that which rejects their fanatical claims. Unfortunately, they are given far too much publicity and air time to postulate their views which are often highly skewed in their favour. Any opposing views are rapidly consigned to Room 101 because they do not reflect the perceived wisdom, as laid down for us.
The BNP can carry out as many street protests as they like, think they are getting good support but until that support translates into votes, nothing is going to change.
I have also been asked this question when I have argued that there is a current need for a revolution to reclaim our country. I have long given up on what passes for the democratic process, because there actually needs to be one to participate in. Anyway, I digress. I think the answer to your question is we do not REPLACE anything. We RESTORE, what we once had.
Our country is not some third world banana republic which freed itself from colonial rule and then set about destroying everything that had been built. Our country evolved over many centuries, with much blood, sweat and tears to give rights to its citizens, enshrined in extremely important documents such as Magna Carta and The English Bill of Rights. Those documents are our written constitution and form the basis for all our hard won rights.
The political establishment has deliberately set about to destroy or ignore those rights, and with inexorable and growing pace since we joined the European Union and had many of our laws and our rights subsumed by Roman Law (or Code Napeleon), which operates throughout much of Europe.
If anything needs to be REPLACED it is the treasonous political establishment who are gradually removing our ancient rights and leading us towards totalitarianism in all but name.
Even though I am an expatriate, who also worked abroad in several different countries, for many years, during my working life, I am still concerned for the well being of my country and my family members who continue live in it. Being an expatriate does not prevent me from being a patriot.
I have read, with great interest the comings and goings and the machinations that have been occurring within the BNP, even though I am literally on the outside looking in. As such, I have had to take much of what I read at face value. But the face value is still very disturbing.
With this latest news, I suddenly realised why I prevaricated over becoming a full member of the party. Now I am retired, at my age I have seen many groups, organisations and political parties come and go. Particularly parties that claim they are nationalist and were established to represent the people of their own country. I do not doubt that these parties are genuine in their aspirations and were established, originally, by well meaning people who really do share the concerns of the native people.
Without exception, all these organisations ended up being fragmented with internecine strife among their leadership and competing personalities. Until they disappeared without trace.
A good example, at the moment, is the English Democrat Party which was formed to represent the English people, following a devolution settlement that left the English with very real concerns over the democratic, economic and social deficits that were redressed for the Welsh, Scots and Irish but increased for the English. Yet again, I see another nationalist party riven with internal strife, unable to organise itself to mount an effective election campaign for the votes of disillusioned English people.
I think it is very sad and dangerous for the future of our country and the native population that the BNP seems to be travelling the same route. Why? is it because of personalities or egos or the personal ambitions of those who have gained influential positions? I don't know. I am neither qualified or have the information necessary to pass any judgments.
However, I do perceive that the BNP is falling into the same fragmentation process of other parties that preceded it. I am seriously beginning to think that the BNP has been infiltrated by people whose objective is to destroy what could, potentially, be a serious threat to the ruling establishment.
After all, there is a history of infiltration of political parties by those pursuing their own agenda. The Labour party is a good example. The Communist/Marxists and far left such as Straw, Hain, Mandelson, Reid, Blunkett et al joined that party and then proceeded to pervert and corrupt it from within for their extremist left wing ideals. With great success.