<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/299057</link>
		<description>Comments by Grumpygit</description>
<item>
<title>London Patriot : Birmingham City Council to build homes for ex-soldiers</title>
<link>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/03/26/birmingham-city-council-to-build-homes-for-ex-soldiers/#IDComment137777424</link>
<description>I am now waiting for claims from foreigners, supported by the EHRC, that this policy is racist.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/03/26/birmingham-city-council-to-build-homes-for-ex-soldiers/#IDComment137777424</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : No justice for Scots Patriot</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/pp-news/802-no-justice-for-scots-patriot#IDComment137707616</link>
<description>The decision by this court has its history going back to the murder of Stephen Lawrence. The enquiry into why nobody was convicted of this crime was led by &amp;#039;Lord&amp;#039; McPherson who entered into the process with pre conceived, political bias against anybody who is white. Basically, if you are white then you are automatically racist, hence McPherson&amp;#039;s ridiculous claim that the police were &amp;#039;institutionally racist&amp;#039;. How can an institution be racist, anyway? However, McPherson&amp;#039;s decision has had major ramifications for the whole of the country and its institutions, to the detriment and abuse of the native population.  This Aberdeen Court&amp;#039;s decision is merely a reflection of the McPherson report and his Stalinist bias being a continuation.  For more information on McPherson, read Frank Ellis&amp;#039;s excellent report.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2010/02/macphearson-report-guilty-as-charged-by.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2010/02/mac...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/pp-news/802-no-justice-for-scots-patriot#IDComment137707616</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Return to Camp of the Saints</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/799-return-to-camp-of-the-saints#IDComment137599928</link>
<description>I disagree with the first part of your first sentence and agree with the second part regarding abortion. For a culture to survive each couple needs to have approximately 2.1 children. And that is for it to remain static. Currently, white couples, the world over are having only about 1.4 children per couple and that means terminal decline in our race and culture. Even if that figure was increased to the minimum survival number, it would take about one hundred years to stablise the population level.  In the meantime, as we all know, the African and Asian races are having an average of 3 to 4 children per couple, thus doubling their population with every generation, roughly.  There is no doubt that the human animal is outbreeding its habitat and will move to pastures new to feed itself. Currently the new pastures are Europe but it won&amp;#039;t be long before those pastures have been stripped of their resources.  As we are being hard hearted here, it is a stark fact that the human race needs to be culled in order for it to survive. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/799-return-to-camp-of-the-saints#IDComment137599928</guid>
</item><item>
<title>London Patriot : Fightback: An Eye for an Eye and a Tooth for a Tooth</title>
<link>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/03/17/fightback-an-eye-for-an-eye-and-a-tooth-for-a-tooth/#IDComment135914129</link>
<description>Just what is he suggesting? If it&amp;#039;s what I think it is then it would require massive organisation, funding and the consent of the majority of the native people. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/03/17/fightback-an-eye-for-an-eye-and-a-tooth-for-a-tooth/#IDComment135914129</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : EHRC CONTROLLED MEDIA RELEASE</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/sarah-maid-of-albion/770-ehrc-controlled-media-release#IDComment135183325</link>
<description>Are you sure that it is not Muslims Prefer Blondes. Preferably below the age of 16. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/sarah-maid-of-albion/770-ehrc-controlled-media-release#IDComment135183325</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Passive Smoking; what Dangers?</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/albion/763-passive-smoking-what-dangers#IDComment134856150</link>
<description>Quote: Roy Castle, the jazz musician and television presenter who died from lung cancer in 1994, claimed that he contracted the disease from years of inhaling smoke while performing in pubs and clubs. Unquote.  On a radio talk show recently, a woman from the anti smoking fascists was interviewed. As usual, the case of Roy Castle was used as her &amp;#039;evidence&amp;#039;. Another caller asked this woman if it was correct that Roy Castle smoked cigars! Which he did. The anti smoking woman refused to answer the question.  That is an example of how people who are fanatical about a particular subject, whether it be &amp;#039;global warming&amp;#039;, now morphed into &amp;#039;climate change or anti smoking etc, refuse to look at all the evidence, especially that which rejects their fanatical claims. Unfortunately, they are given far too much publicity and air time to postulate their views which are often highly skewed in their favour. Any opposing views are rapidly consigned to Room 101 because they do not reflect the perceived wisdom, as laid down for us. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/albion/763-passive-smoking-what-dangers#IDComment134856150</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Nick Griffin is still on the ball - just</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/thepilgrim/762-nick-griffin-is-still-on-the-ball-just#IDComment134854720</link>
<description>Do you think, perhaps, the following link from Sarah Maid of Albion&amp;#039;s blog puts the finger on the BNP&amp;#039;s problems?   &lt;a href=&quot;http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2011/03/this-honourable-and-noble-cause-part1.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2011/03/thi...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/thepilgrim/762-nick-griffin-is-still-on-the-ball-just#IDComment134854720</guid>
</item><item>
<title>London Patriot : No Mosque in Green Lanes</title>
<link>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/03/13/no-mosque-in-green-lanes/#IDComment134634408</link>
<description>I hate to say it but you are beating your heads against a brick wall. The people of Dagenham had the chance to vote in the BNP but they did not do so. As I wrote on the main BNP comments site, it has been said that in a democracy the people get the government they deserve. There is no point in the good folk of Dagenham whining about a new mosque and the closure of businesses in their area. They got the council they voted for, even if the turnout was low, which is still not a good enough excuse. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The BNP can carry out as many street protests as they like, think they are getting good support but until that support translates into votes, nothing is going to change.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/03/13/no-mosque-in-green-lanes/#IDComment134634408</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Finally the BCG Report from 11th March</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/758-finally-the-bcg-report-from-11th-march#IDComment134615687</link>
<description>GA, you wrote. Quote: I did have reservations with regards to just what they intend to replace the current establishment structure with when and if they are successful. Unquote.  I have also been asked this question when I have argued that there is a current need for a revolution to reclaim our country. I have long given up on what passes for the democratic process, because there actually needs to be one to participate in. Anyway, I digress. I think the answer to your question is we do not REPLACE anything. We RESTORE, what we once had.  Our country is not some third world banana republic which freed itself from colonial rule and then set about destroying everything that had been built. Our country evolved over many centuries, with much blood, sweat and tears to give rights to its citizens, enshrined in extremely important documents such as Magna Carta and The English Bill of Rights. Those documents are our written constitution and form the basis for all our hard won rights.  The political establishment has deliberately set about to destroy or ignore those rights, and with inexorable and growing pace since we joined the European Union and had many of our laws and our rights subsumed by Roman Law (or Code Napeleon), which operates throughout much of Europe.  If anything needs to be REPLACED it is the treasonous political establishment who are gradually removing our ancient rights and leading us towards totalitarianism in all but name. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/the-editor/758-finally-the-bcg-report-from-11th-march#IDComment134615687</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Arthur Kemp resigns BNP positions</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/pp-news/731-arthur-kemp-resigns-bnp-positions#IDComment132980968</link>
<description>I have been toying with the notion of becoming a member of the BNP for quite a long time, yet for some reason I did not make the final step and sign up. Some months ago, I do not think that I could have given coherent reasons for not taking out a membership. Partly, because for quite a number of years I have lived in Spain, ( before I looked into the BNP as a political party to support).   Even though I am an expatriate, who also worked abroad in several different countries, for many years, during my working life, I am still concerned for the well being of my country and my family members who continue live in it. Being an expatriate does not prevent me from being a patriot.  I have read, with great interest the comings and goings and the machinations that have been occurring within the BNP, even though I am literally on the outside looking in. As such, I have had to take much of what I read at face value. But the face value is still very disturbing.  With this latest news, I suddenly realised why I prevaricated over becoming a full member of the party. Now I am retired, at my age I have seen many groups, organisations and political parties come and go. Particularly parties that claim they are nationalist and were established to represent the people of their own country. I do not doubt that these parties are genuine in their aspirations and were established, originally, by well meaning people who really do share the concerns of the native people.  Without exception, all these organisations ended up being fragmented with internecine strife among their leadership and competing personalities. Until they disappeared without trace.  A good example, at the moment, is the English Democrat Party which was formed to represent the English people, following a devolution settlement that left the English with very real concerns over the democratic, economic and social deficits that were redressed for the Welsh, Scots and Irish but increased for the English. Yet again, I see another nationalist party riven with internal strife, unable to organise itself to mount an effective election campaign for the votes of disillusioned English people.  I think it is very sad and dangerous for the future of our country and the native population that the BNP seems to be travelling the same route. Why? is it because of personalities or egos or the personal ambitions  of those who have gained influential positions? I don&amp;#039;t know. I am neither qualified or have the information necessary to pass any judgments.  However, I do perceive that the BNP is falling into the same fragmentation process of other parties that preceded it. I am seriously beginning to think that the BNP has been infiltrated by people whose objective is to destroy what could, potentially, be a serious threat to the ruling establishment.  After all, there is a history of infiltration of political parties by those pursuing their own agenda. The Labour party is a good example. The Communist/Marxists and far left such as Straw, Hain, Mandelson, Reid, Blunkett et al joined that party and then proceeded to pervert and corrupt it from within for their extremist left wing ideals. With great success. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 6 Mar 2011 22:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/pp-news/731-arthur-kemp-resigns-bnp-positions#IDComment132980968</guid>
</item><item>
<title>London Patriot : Riots in Town Halls across London</title>
<link>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/03/03/riots-in-town-halls-across-london/#IDComment132122554</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sure that all the usual suspects were involved. The extreme left wing renta a crowd mob of unions, UAF, Socialist Worker&amp;#039;s Party (now there&amp;#039;s a contradiction in terms!) and Militant Tendency etc. It&amp;#039;s gratifying to see the extreme left rioting against the extreme left in the councils, who gave them a feather bedded ride with all their benefits for so long. They may have believed they were living in a Utopian socialist world, and perhaps they were for a while, but now the real world has arrived and they don&amp;#039;t like reality at all.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Mar 2011 15:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/03/03/riots-in-town-halls-across-london/#IDComment132122554</guid>
</item><item>
<title>London Patriot : Runaway foreign patients cost Barking, Dagenham and Redbridge University Hospital Trust £4.2m in un</title>
<link>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/26/runaway-foreign-patients-cost-barking-dagenham-and-redbridge-university-hospital-trust-4-2m-in-unpaid-bills/#IDComment130877200</link>
<description>I hate to say this, and at one time I never thought I would, but we need some form of identity system. Not the intrusive kind of ID card that was being proposed and then dropped but some other system. In Spain anybody who wants to buy a house or a car or has a bank account etc (including non resident foreigners) must have a fiscal number. This number is registered with the Spanish government, police, tax and health authorities. Without it and being unable to present it would deny you all Spanish services. In shops and supermarkets id is always asked if you use a credit or debit card and your signature is matched from you id, which could be a driving licence and very often your passport, with you signature on the credit slip. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Foreigners coming to our hospitals should be refused treatment if they cannot produce proof of payment for health services along with id or passports. Passports should be held by the hospital along with the details of the address the foreigner is staying at and non payment should result in the passport being passed to the police. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;It won&amp;#039;t happen though because this is soft touch Britain.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 19:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/26/runaway-foreign-patients-cost-barking-dagenham-and-redbridge-university-hospital-trust-4-2m-in-unpaid-bills/#IDComment130877200</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : When the truth becomes the crime</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/sarah-maid-of-albion/704-when-the-truth-becomes-the-crime#IDComment129711221</link>
<description>Thank God, that we still have juries, (for the moment at least). In Europe jury trial is unheard of which is why these courts can get away with their politically biased decisions. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/sarah-maid-of-albion/704-when-the-truth-becomes-the-crime#IDComment129711221</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : The Political National Health Service</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/bc1959/702-the-political-national-health-service#IDComment129662055</link>
<description>Going along the theme of the politicisation of the NHS, (you could also name each and every other public institution in this country that has been politicised) I have often wondered, since the birth of my grand daughters, if new born babies are having dna samples taken from them to be placed on the national data base. It would not surprise me, in this totalitarian, police state if they were. Perhaps the Libyans can teach us a thing or two. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/bc1959/702-the-political-national-health-service#IDComment129662055</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : The Law: An Alien Landscape</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/bc1959/692-the-law-an-alien-landscape#IDComment128425761</link>
<description>Unfortunately civilians have been the target of wars in the twentieth and now the twenty first century. Civilian casualties are dismissed as merely &amp;#039;collateral damage&amp;#039;, yet in too many cases they are deliberately targetted. In the First World War civilian casualties were approximately 10%. In the Second World war, I think that figure was about 50%. In Vietnam, 70% and in Iraq the number of civilian casualties was about 90%. I&amp;#039;m not sure about those exact percentages, having forgotten exactly what was numbered in the article I read but I don&amp;#039;t think I am too far out.  The nature of warfare itself has also changed dramatically. Modern warfare involves combatants who do not wear uniforms or any insignia eg Iraq and Afghanistan, therefore our military is facing enemies who are all civilian.  I fully expect war to eventually break out in Europe with a clash of cultures, where one culture, which is Islam, fighting for dominance over the culture that plays host to them. Once again, the majority of casualties will be civilian because of the very nature of the war that will be fought. War between opposing armies, recognisable to each other is rapidly becoming consigned to history.  Perhaps the people trying to rewrite the terms of the Geneva Convention are aware of this and perhaps they are looking to the future where war with civilian combatants will be expected.  As Machiavelli wrote, War cannot be avoided, only postponed, to the advantage of your enemies. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/bc1959/692-the-law-an-alien-landscape#IDComment128425761</guid>
</item><item>
<title>London Patriot : EU control on foreign nurses axed: Allowed to work with 2 days&#039; testing</title>
<link>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/12/eu-control-on-foreign-nurses-axed-allowed-to-work-with-2-days-testing/#IDComment127556436</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m a bit confused by this. I have lived in Spain for a number of years and I know that no such laws exist in Spanish hospitals, (which, incidentally, are far superior to British hospitals). No person, without a tested knowledge of fluent Spanish can work as doctors or nurses in the Spanish health service. In fact, they go even further. I knew of a female doctor whose first language was Castellano who applied for work in a hospital in the Valencia region. She was refused because she could not speak fluent Valenciano, a different Spanish dialect.  So, what&amp;#039;s going on in Britain? Is this really the result of EU policy or is the EU being blamed for cost cutting by the British government? Whatever the reason, this is one stupid policy and whoever is responsible for it should be told to go to hell. How many patients will have to die before sanity returns.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/12/eu-control-on-foreign-nurses-axed-allowed-to-work-with-2-days-testing/#IDComment127556436</guid>
</item><item>
<title>London Patriot : No vote for Criminals</title>
<link>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/10/no-vote-for-criminals/#IDComment127175422</link>
<description>Parliament has nothing to do with it. The European Court of Human Rights has decreed that Britain will obey the laws handed down to us by foreign plenipotentiaries. All the debate in the Houses of Commons and Lords is nothing more than hot air, because we are bound by EU law, having given up our sovereignty to foreign powers many years ago and increasingly with each treaty signed. Parliament, long ago, abandoned any pretense of being answerable to the people who elected them by signing away our sovereign rights.  The real question should be, will Cameron have the balls to tell the EU to go to hell? Somehow I doubt it. Instead we will be given more lies, spin and deceit and they will make the case for giving prisoners voting rights in order to hide (a) our inability to decide our own futures and laws because of our membership of the EU. (b) They will have to do this to camouflage exactly what our membership of the EU has cost us in terms of our sovereignty and (c) They will not have the guts to face down the EU.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/10/no-vote-for-criminals/#IDComment127175422</guid>
</item><item>
<title>London Patriot : The Battle Lines Are Hardening: Extremist Groups Searchlight and UAF to be Banned?</title>
<link>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/06/the-battle-lines-are-hardening-extremist-groups-searchlight-and-uaf-to-be-banned/#IDComment127006734</link>
<description>There is always a problem with banning groups such as these. To start with, they will simply carry on under different names and cosmetic changes to their organisations. Also, who decides who is extremist? The BNP is always referred to, in the media and by politicians as extreme or far right, the inference being that the party is extremist. If the UAF or Searchlight are banned, then attention will turn to the BNP or the EDL.   The politicians would love nothing more than banning any and all organisations that they view as a threat to their establishment and priviliges, thus ensuring that the four or five year elective dictatorship system that poses as a democracy will last forever. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.londonpatriot.org/2011/02/06/the-battle-lines-are-hardening-extremist-groups-searchlight-and-uaf-to-be-banned/#IDComment127006734</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Is it a Bird? Is it a Plane? No, it\&#039;s Muscular Liberalism!</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/guest-writers/662-is-it-a-bird-is-it-a-plane-no-its-muscular-liberalism#IDComment126188743</link>
<description>Quote: It certainly conjures up a most disturbing image of a bewhiskered muscleman in skintight lycra, wrists made weak by the great burden of liberalism he must hold. Unquote.  You&amp;#039;ve just described George Galloway. LOL </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 5 Feb 2011 21:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/guest-writers/662-is-it-a-bird-is-it-a-plane-no-its-muscular-liberalism#IDComment126188743</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://thebritishresistanc.co.uk/ : Prophets of Doom: David Bentley Hart and the Triumph of the Will</title>
<link>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/tim-haydon/656-prophets-of-doom-david-bentley-hart-and-the-triumph-of-the-will#IDComment125998160</link>
<description>I am old enough to remember when I was actually free. My freedom was based on an unwritten law that everything was permissible except that which was prohibited. Clearly, I could not have the freedom to commit murder or theft etc, so my freedom was never total. However, it was based on the teachings and evolution of Christian values. Those values also instilled, from an early age, consideration for others and a common courtesy which prevented my freedoms impinging on the freedoms of others. One of the checks and balances that prevented my freedoms being abused by others was a legal system that punished wrongdoers and applied to all, thus there was a general respect for the law and a fear of the consequences by offending against it.  All that was way back when we were a mono-racial, mono-cultural society in which the majority of people obeyed accepted norms of behaviour, both written into law and unwritten by the communities in which we lived.  The &amp;#039;liberals&amp;#039; and the extreme left socialists have destroyed that cohesion by adopting a moral relativism which regards every race, creed, culture and lifestyle as having equal value, when clearly it does not. The not so &amp;#039;liberals&amp;#039; and the far left have deliberately set out to destroy our nation and its cohesion. In effect, they have waged a war against us. So far they are winning, however, like the pendulum they will reach a zenith before public opinion cause it to swing back in the opposite direction. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Feb 2011 21:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/tim-haydon/656-prophets-of-doom-david-bentley-hart-and-the-triumph-of-the-will#IDComment125998160</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>