AuditeVerum
56p9 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
114 weeks ago @ iPhone cases and acces... - iPhonefreak Review & G... · 0 replies · +1 points
114 weeks ago @ iPhone cases and acces... - iPhonefreak Review & G... · 0 replies · +1 points
117 weeks ago @ Big Government - New Daily Podcast Feat... · 0 replies · +1 points
123 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Marcia Clark: Polanski... · 1 reply · +2 points
124 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - BREAKING: Yosi Sergant... · 1 reply · +3 points
124 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - BREAKING: Yosi Sergant... · 0 replies · +3 points
It's time for that truculent jackass Rocco Landesman to go. His publicly funded arts endowment is expressly forbidden from engaging in partisan politics and respecting that boundary should be one of his most sacred duties--that he would spit in our face when confronted with this scandal is insulting in the extreme. How can the taxpaying public countenance that kind of bad attitude? This disgusting churl has got to go as he simply does not "get it."
124 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - BREAKING: Yosi Sergant... · 0 replies · +10 points
Nah, he'll be tossed aside as there are always more starry-eyed ethically-impaired cultists ready to step up and be consumed. Cannon fodder with sideburns. Frankly, it would almost be admirable on some level if Obama stuck by people like this, but he'll throw 'em under the bus and stammer out a vague denial. Like Anthony "Van" Jones, he'll be sopped up by the liberal machinery outside the WH and he'll be fine. Lots of war stories for the gang at the coffee shop. Sure, he'll be taken care of, but he won't be allowed anywhere near The One anymore.
124 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - NEA Call Not Meant to ... · 0 replies · +4 points
124 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - BREAKING: NEA Chairman... · 1 reply · +11 points
Fact 1: That's not the whole story, is it? He claimed in the call to have been asked by the WH to bring these artists together (most of whom are NEA grant recipients) to turn their attention to aiding the WH with political issues. Your understatement is absurd.
Fact 2: Seeing as he was the Director of Communications for NEA and, presumably was conducting this business on company (so to speak) time, the assertion that he acted completely on his own is hard to accept. It's not as though he was some low-level clerical worker with an activist bent, he was your Director of Communications. Your assertion is laughable.
Fact 3: The call most certainly did attempt to promote a legislative agenda. Listen to the tape and explain the presence of the WH.
Fact 4: You bet the language was a problem. This employee--who, as you assert, was acting completely on his own, should be fired for such a foolish act that would bring such embarrassment to the NEA. As a taxpayer who finds this behavior odious, (and who pays his salary), I'd like to know to what duties he was "reassigned." Your obfuscation is insulting.
That the NEA would make this adversarial, defensive and frankly, untruthful response to this very real and troubling issue is disturbing at best. If this is the official response, I say it is time to closely scrutinize the NEA and reconsider its funding.
Joint