<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2260679</link>
		<description>Comments by theMediatrix</description>
<item>
<title>Crasstalk : What&#039;s in a Name?</title>
<link>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/whats-in-a-name/#IDComment115876641</link>
<description>No.  Mine is better. (Don&amp;#039;t stab me!) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/whats-in-a-name/#IDComment115876641</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Crasstalk : The Rise And (Hopeful) Fall Of Gawker</title>
<link>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/the-rise-and-hopeful-fall-of-gawker/#IDComment115876395</link>
<description>I would like to know who.  I&amp;#039;m thinking of one person that maybe the eds were anti, but I thought she was a hilarious commenter and a great part of the site.  Then I can think of a couple other maybes who fall into that category.  I wonder if they didn&amp;#039;t want folks creating more witty interesting content than they did?  Sorry to dwell, but I&amp;#039;m always interested in content and editorial decisions and wondering if that was part of this... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/the-rise-and-hopeful-fall-of-gawker/#IDComment115876395</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Crasstalk : The Overlord Speaks!</title>
<link>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/the-overlord-speaks/#IDComment115574476</link>
<description>I got it, yes.  I thought it was nice that they did it.  :) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/the-overlord-speaks/#IDComment115574476</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Crasstalk : The Overlord Speaks!</title>
<link>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/the-overlord-speaks/#IDComment115574270</link>
<description>My account seems to have disappeared as well.  :( </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/the-overlord-speaks/#IDComment115574270</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Crasstalk : The Rise And (Hopeful) Fall Of Gawker</title>
<link>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/the-rise-and-hopeful-fall-of-gawker/#IDComment115574114</link>
<description>Thanks for this.  It puts the situation in context, especially concerning Gizmodo.    I&amp;#039;ve been annoyed by the editorial direction of Gawker itself since Gabriel Snyder left, and what&amp;#039;s ironic about that is that I didn&amp;#039;t even like Gabe!  I thought he was watering down the intelligent snark of the writers (which I&amp;#039;d loved prior to his tenure), and yet, he did manage to keep me reading...    Now days, I don&amp;#039;t know what the fuck is up with the editorial vision.  Is there one?  Doesn&amp;#039;t seem like it.  Interesting to read about the same lack of vision at Giz. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/the-rise-and-hopeful-fall-of-gawker/#IDComment115574114</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Crasstalk : Baking with Stabby: Basic croissant recipe</title>
<link>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/baking-with-stabby-basic-croissant-recipe/#IDComment115572248</link>
<description>I cannot wait to try this! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://crasstalk.com/2010/12/baking-with-stabby-basic-croissant-recipe/#IDComment115572248</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Crasstalk : How to start commenting on #Crasstalk</title>
<link>https://crasstalk.com/2010/12/how-to-start-commenting-on-crasstalk/#IDComment115569202</link>
<description>Hooray, I&amp;#039;m here!  (Ahem, of course my Gawker account still isn&amp;#039;t working, but one out of two is better than nothing.)</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://crasstalk.com/2010/12/how-to-start-commenting-on-crasstalk/#IDComment115569202</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>