Ok, for the record, when I said "commence hate", that wasn't actually an invitation to hate. But I guess the sarcasm was lost.
In any event, children brought up in homosexual unions are many times more likely to be abused than children under the care of a Catholic priest. Therefore, if I use your logic and claim the cases of exceptional misconduct are evidence of the true nature of the teachings of a particular ideology, then I would have to thereby infer that molestation is even more integral to your belief system than mine.
Of course, this is not true and I do not believe it for a second. But that's because I'm not using your logic.
Now, in the interest of civil discussion, if you care to read anything about the actual teachings of the Catholic Church, you might be surprised to learn that molestation is NOT okay by our rules, and in fact is rebuked with the highest degree of forcefulness.
Can't we all just agree that molestation is bad, and that anyone who does so ought to be locked up? Come to think of it, why the hell are we even talking about molestation in the first place?

My position would be identical to the Catholic Church's position towards all advocacy of homosexual activity: no thx.
(Commence hate.)

YOU seem to care.
Not to mention that you yourself seem to be remarkably "intolerant" of opinions you disagree with.
If you really don't care, and wish to truly embody the tolerance you seem to hold as an ideal, you would've shrugged it off, or at least begun a dialogue, rather than attempting to shut them down as you did.

Since no one has posted it yet: http://youtu.be/k7IAabH_hbo