<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2355202</link>
		<description>Comments by slightlymetaphysical</description>
<item>
<title>http://spark-in-darkness.blogspot.com/ : The EHRC needs guidence on whether to be bigots or not</title>
<link>http://www.sparkindarkness.com/2011/08/ehrc-needs-guidence-on-whether-to-be.html#IDComment186196123</link>
<description>Am I reading this wrong? Because the version of the consultation that I can see seems to state that the EHRC agrees with the conclusions of the domestic courts in McFarlane and Ladele, and their big push on religious rights is the ability to wear religious signifiers at work, which is far less of a horrific proposition. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.sparkindarkness.com/2011/08/ehrc-needs-guidence-on-whether-to-be.html#IDComment186196123</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>