<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/971172</link>
		<description>Comments by Jeremy P.</description>
<item>
<title>TechCrunch : Android Fanboys Have Arrived. And That&#039;s A Good Thing</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/30/android-fanboys/#IDComment77885968</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Apple is closed, Google is open. But what does open mean? if you&amp;#039;re a cell phone manufacturer, you get a free OS. If you&amp;#039;re a developer, then you&amp;#039;re developing your apps with any IDE that you wish. Flash is a go. If you&amp;#039;re an end-user, nothing changes. NOTHING CHANGES END USER.&amp;quot;  I&amp;#039;m not an iPhone user, but I was under the impression that it&amp;#039;s not possible to install apps to the iPhone without iTunes/AppStore unless you&amp;#039;re jailbroken. Am I misinformed? Android will allow it if you select a check box that pops up a warning dialog. That&amp;#039;s one change open vs closed offers the end user that might feel he/she doesn&amp;#039;t need to be protected.   This also ties into a change you have not mentioned for developers. Freedom to sell/distribute their app outside the Android Market. They can offer it for download from their own website, or another market app, such as Slide Me ( &lt;a href=&quot;http://slideme.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://slideme.org/&lt;/a&gt; ). </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 08:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/30/android-fanboys/#IDComment77885968</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Android Fanboys Have Arrived. And That&#039;s A Good Thing</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/30/android-fanboys/#IDComment77883895</link>
<description>I think it&amp;#039;s the likelihood (certainty?) of &amp;quot;any Android tablet&amp;quot; having Flash (the Adobe kind) that made it a win. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 07:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/30/android-fanboys/#IDComment77883895</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Android Fanboys Have Arrived. And That&#039;s A Good Thing</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/30/android-fanboys/#IDComment77822991</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re wrong there. At best google spec&amp;#039;d out what they wanted and told HTC &amp;quot;build me this&amp;quot;. Google has no interest in selling phone or any other hardware. The purpose of the Nexus One was to show hardware vendors what they should be doing with Android. I think the Nexus One has served is purpose with devices like the Incredible and EVO having followed. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 18:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/30/android-fanboys/#IDComment77822991</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Android Fanboys Have Arrived. And That&#039;s A Good Thing</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/30/android-fanboys/#IDComment77821377</link>
<description>I look forward to WebOS powering the next generation of HP printers... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 18:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/30/android-fanboys/#IDComment77821377</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Google Android Blog : Google and Cyanogen comments imply task killer/manager apps are pointless</title>
<link>http://androinica.com/2010/05/07/google-and-cyanogen-comments-imply-task-killermanager-apps-are-pointless/#IDComment74067395</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re right... why believe Google about the products they created. Then we&amp;#039;d be just like the, Apple worshiping sheep. I&amp;#039;d love to hear a few of these short comings on the Nexus One. I can name so many. It muti-tasks, has expandable storage, flash for the camera, user swappable battery, noise cancelling mic, free turn by turn GPS... Ugh! What a completely useless phone amirite? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 8 May 2010 09:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://androinica.com/2010/05/07/google-and-cyanogen-comments-imply-task-killermanager-apps-are-pointless/#IDComment74067395</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>