<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/859194</link>
		<description>Comments by sarainitaly</description>
<item>
<title>Wonkette : Oh Look Here Is Cheating Cheater Mitt Romney Pulling Illegal Notes Out At The Debate (Updated)</title>
<link>http://wonkette.com/486023/oh-look-here-is-cheating-cheater-mitt-romney-pulling-illegal-notes-out-at-the-debate-video#IDComment456228198</link>
<description>Seriously? You&amp;#039;ve never seen a linen handkerchief before?   Stop the stupid, please.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Oct 2012 19:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wonkette.com/486023/oh-look-here-is-cheating-cheater-mitt-romney-pulling-illegal-notes-out-at-the-debate-video#IDComment456228198</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Republicans Fall For Manufactured Story</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/03/02/republicans-fall-for-manufactured-story/#IDComment307136755</link>
<description>They should have invoked the Obama-Hoffa rule.  &amp;quot;Rush speaks for himself, I speak for myself.&amp;quot;  Republicans / Candidates should not be asked or expected to condemn his remarks, as was the example set by Obama and Jay Carney.  And as the Left told us plenty of times when Palin, Bachmann and Palin&amp;#039;s children were attacked, it was ok, because they put themselves in the spotlight.  Condemning Rush is giving the Left exactly what they want, Maher or Schultz be damned.    </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/03/02/republicans-fall-for-manufactured-story/#IDComment307136755</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : EXCLUSIVE: O&#039;Keefe Files Suit Against Al Gore&#039;s Current TV, Keith Olbermann, David Shuster</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305642716</link>
<description>Nope. Try again. Did you read the court documents? She does not accuse him of sexual misconduct. Olby and Shuster did, she didn&amp;#039;t. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305642716</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : EXCLUSIVE: O&#039;Keefe Files Suit Against Al Gore&#039;s Current TV, Keith Olbermann, David Shuster</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305641665</link>
<description>She never claimed she was drugged or that she thought she was drugged.  You didn&amp;#039;t answer my other questions. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305641665</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart (1969-2012)</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305464279</link>
<description>THIS IS NOT REAL????  So sad to learn that this is real. So sorry for his family at home, and the Bigs.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/lsolov/2012/03/01/draft/#IDComment305464279</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : EXCLUSIVE: O&#039;Keefe Files Suit Against Al Gore&#039;s Current TV, Keith Olbermann, David Shuster</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305462678</link>
<description>Can i be on the jury? pleeeeeeeeease! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305462678</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : EXCLUSIVE: O&#039;Keefe Files Suit Against Al Gore&#039;s Current TV, Keith Olbermann, David Shuster</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305459547</link>
<description>She did NOT making the accusation.  Where did she make this accusation?   Shuster and Olby made it, she didn&amp;#039;t.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305459547</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : EXCLUSIVE: O&#039;Keefe Files Suit Against Al Gore&#039;s Current TV, Keith Olbermann, David Shuster</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305458387</link>
<description>Nadia did not accuse him of sexual misconduct.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305458387</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : EXCLUSIVE: O&#039;Keefe Files Suit Against Al Gore&#039;s Current TV, Keith Olbermann, David Shuster</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305457903</link>
<description>&amp;quot;O&amp;rsquo;Keefe has not been charged with a felony&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;he has not been accused of any inappropriate sexual or even physical contact.&amp;quot;  O&amp;#039;Keefe was charged, not convicted, of a felony. Shuster called him a *convicted felon*.   O&amp;#039;Keefe was not accused of inappropriate sexual or physical conduct. Again, did you read Nadia&amp;#039;s statements in the court document? She made no such claims.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305457903</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : EXCLUSIVE: O&#039;Keefe Files Suit Against Al Gore&#039;s Current TV, Keith Olbermann, David Shuster</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305455411</link>
<description>Who accused him of drugging someone? Proof please.    Nadia didn&amp;#039;t. Did you bother to read the court documents? She made no claim, and her friends said she made no claim. Did she go to the police, and get drug tested? Did she file a police report that she was drugged? No, and No.  Shuster did, and that is one of the reasons O&amp;#039;Keefe filed the lawsuit.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305455411</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : EXCLUSIVE: O&#039;Keefe Files Suit Against Al Gore&#039;s Current TV, Keith Olbermann, David Shuster</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305454046</link>
<description>InfiniteJester76p &amp;middot; 20 hours ago Umm... O&amp;#039;Keefe most certainly has been accused of sexual misconduct, even if he has not been charged in relation to it.  Who accused him of sexual misconduct? Proof, please. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/chartsock/2012/02/29/exclusive-okeefe-files-suit-against-al-gores-current-tv-keith-olbermann-david-shuster/#IDComment305454046</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Struggle to Understand Cause and Effect</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/20/progressives-struggle-to-understand-cause-and-effect/#IDComment298998108</link>
<description>Not true. Women who choose medical abortions do have ultrasounds. They also receive an ultrasound following the procedure. See above.  You obviously have no idea about where I stand on the issue, and you are making assumptions that are incorrect.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/20/progressives-struggle-to-understand-cause-and-effect/#IDComment298998108</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Struggle to Understand Cause and Effect</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/20/progressives-struggle-to-understand-cause-and-effect/#IDComment298179989</link>
<description>Ultrasounds Already Part of VA Planned Parenthood Abortion Procedure  The Virginia League for Planned Parenthood didn&amp;rsquo;t immediately return calls yesterday. But here&amp;rsquo;s what it said on the recording for its abortion services information hotline:  &amp;ldquo;Patients who have a surgical abortion generally come in for two appointments. At the first visit we do a health assessment, perform all the necessary lab work, and do an ultrasound. This visit generally takes about an hour. At the second visit, the procedure takes place. This visit takes about an hour as well. For out of town patients for whom it would be difficult to make two trips to our office, we&amp;rsquo;re able to schedule both the initial appointment and the procedure on the same day.  Medical abortions generally require three visits. At the first visit, we do a health assessment, perform all the necessary lab work, and do an ultrasound. This visit takes about an hour. At the second visit, the physician gives the first pill and directions for taking two more pills at home. The third visit is required during which you will have an exam and another ultrasound.&amp;rdquo;   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/20/progressives-struggle-to-understand-cause-and-effect/#IDComment298179989</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Struggle to Understand Cause and Effect</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/20/progressives-struggle-to-understand-cause-and-effect/#IDComment298072091</link>
<description>If it becomes part of the procedure, it&amp;#039;s part of the procedure. You get *transvaginal examinations* before an abortion, it&amp;#039;s not like the Doctor&amp;#039;s aren&amp;#039;t up *in your business* already. People oppose this because the image is that of a baby, and not some lump of nothingness, that they can brush off.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/20/progressives-struggle-to-understand-cause-and-effect/#IDComment298072091</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Struggle to Understand Cause and Effect</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/20/progressives-struggle-to-understand-cause-and-effect/#IDComment297348991</link>
<description>Oops, Joy!  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/20/progressives-struggle-to-understand-cause-and-effect/#IDComment297348991</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Progressives Struggle to Understand Cause and Effect</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/20/progressives-struggle-to-understand-cause-and-effect/#IDComment297211266</link>
<description>So, they oppose the ultrasound because it is invasive, and akin to &amp;quot;rape&amp;quot;...? What do they think an abortion is? You just click your heels three times, sprinkle some Fairy dust and poof? You can undergo an invasive abortion procedure but not something you should be doing annually, already? (transvaginal examination)  On The View, both Sherri and Barbara say how difficult and traumatic it would be to have to see the ultrasound before the procedure. Sherri even saying she might not have had her many abortions, had she seen the ultrasound beforehand.   Think about that.  Why so traumatic? Because it might actually look like a baby, and not some lump of cells, that can easily be flushed away? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/20/progressives-struggle-to-understand-cause-and-effect/#IDComment297211266</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : A Point By Point Commentary On Keith Olbermann&#039;s &quot;Debunking&quot; Of The Occupy Rape</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2012/02/15/a-point-by-point-commentary-on-keith-olbermanns-debunking-of-the-occupy-rape/#IDComment293965343</link>
<description>Not sure why my comment is stuck in moderation. Free me, please! :O) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2012/02/15/a-point-by-point-commentary-on-keith-olbermanns-debunking-of-the-occupy-rape/#IDComment293965343</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : A Point By Point Commentary On Keith Olbermann&#039;s &quot;Debunking&quot; Of The Occupy Rape</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2012/02/15/a-point-by-point-commentary-on-keith-olbermanns-debunking-of-the-occupy-rape/#IDComment293945903</link>
<description>Nice job Lee.   So funny he goes so far out of his way to prove that these attacks had NOTHING to do with the members at Occupy, yet he was FULLY willing, and even pushed the meme that the alleged spitting was done by Tea Partiers, the alleged n*word was done by tea partiers, the alleged racist signs were done by tea partiers.  Not, perhaps, by individuals, who just showed up, or were in the general area. During the health care signing, there were people all over the place. There was no *proof* that any of the people there were even tea partiers, much less tea partiers that were hurling foul language, or spitting. (the spitting that never happened) The Tea Party rallies were infiltrated by the Westboro people, the LaRouche people, and by Liberals who intentionally set out to paint the movement in a negative light. YET, the very actions of those groups were used AGAINST the tea party.  Olby and his ilk sat there, night after night, attacking Tea Partiers, as &amp;quot;straight up racists&amp;quot;. The entire movement.  Why is OWS afforded this courtesy, defended against rape, molestation, and violence, but Tea Partiers, people who carry signs, and are concerned about our national debt, are not, and even blamed for actions of groups like LaRouche, and fabricated stories about Cleaver being spit on.  Pisses me off, I tell ya.    </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/lstranahan/2012/02/15/a-point-by-point-commentary-on-keith-olbermanns-debunking-of-the-occupy-rape/#IDComment293945903</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Do Keith Olbermann and Markos Moulitsas Think That Rape Doesn&#039;t Matter?</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/14/do-keith-olbermann-and-markos-moulitsas-think-that-rape-doesnt-matter/#IDComment292271536</link>
<description>I keep wondering when Olby is going to do one of his &amp;quot;where are all the black people&amp;quot; speeches, condemning the OWSers for surrounding themselves with only white people. (Of course, I&amp;#039;m being sarcastic.)    Great piece Dana. They really are sad little excuses for men, aren&amp;#039;t they? They can&amp;#039;t even call out rape, because they are neck deep in partisan politics. How many times did Olby rail against Tea Partiers for not calling out perceived racism at events, and he IGNORES rape and other violent crimes?    Do you think he wonders why no one watches him anymore?    With that kind of &amp;quot;commentary&amp;quot; and this kind of wit, I can&amp;#039;t believe he even has his basement show. &lt;a href=&quot;https:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/KeithOlbermann\/status\/169320023360417792&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;https://twitter.com/#!/KeithOlbermann/status/1693...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/14/do-keith-olbermann-and-markos-moulitsas-think-that-rape-doesnt-matter/#IDComment292271536</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Dog Whistle Progressives Fabricate Racial Incident at CPAC</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/10/dog-whistle-progressives-fabricate-racial-incident-at-cpac/#IDComment289683041</link>
<description>Oh gawd. I just can&amp;#039;t stand how stupid the Huff and LGF stories are. It flippin drives me crazy, their level of hate and insanity. These people VOTE and walk among us? Scary. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/10/dog-whistle-progressives-fabricate-racial-incident-at-cpac/#IDComment289683041</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>