<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1000392</link>
		<description>Comments by dougrogers</description>
<item>
<title>The Toast : Why Finn is the Best Character in Star Wars: The Force Awakens</title>
<link>http://the-toast.net/2016/01/07/finn-is-the-best-character-in-star-wars-the-force-awakens/#IDComment1009343850</link>
<description>Yes to all of the above. I have no problem. I just didn&amp;#039;t get the bond between Finn and Rey, and I just have no feeling for his story.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://the-toast.net/2016/01/07/finn-is-the-best-character-in-star-wars-the-force-awakens/#IDComment1009343850</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Arctic glaciers rapidly thawing: study</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/arctic-glaciers-rapidly-thawing-study#IDComment149315333</link>
<description>Hey! Our parliament buildings are up on a hill, so we&amp;#039;ll be okay! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2011 00:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/arctic-glaciers-rapidly-thawing-study#IDComment149315333</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Arctic glaciers rapidly thawing: study</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/arctic-glaciers-rapidly-thawing-study#IDComment149315061</link>
<description>Yea, because cold air is heavier and goes to the bottom. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2011 00:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/04/arctic-glaciers-rapidly-thawing-study#IDComment149315061</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Conservative MP says government could make short-form census optional</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/conservative-mp-says-government-could-make-short-form-census-optional/#IDComment149314257</link>
<description>Just filled it out. Wasn&amp;#039;t asked to do the long form.   As to compulsion and penalties: are those prisons for unreported crime comfy? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 May 2011 00:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/conservative-mp-says-government-could-make-short-form-census-optional/#IDComment149314257</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;I actually don’t know quite what to tell these folks&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/i-actually-don%e2%80%99t-know-quite-what-to-tell-these-folks/#IDComment149196770</link>
<description>Damned if they do, damned if they don&amp;#039;t. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 May 2011 17:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/05/i-actually-don%e2%80%99t-know-quite-what-to-tell-these-folks/#IDComment149196770</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Michael Ignatieff resigns</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/ignatieff-resigns#IDComment148589577</link>
<description>Because they&amp;#039;re not dead yet.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2011 22:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/ignatieff-resigns#IDComment148589577</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Michael Ignatieff resigns</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/ignatieff-resigns#IDComment148516717</link>
<description>Maybe I spelled Machieavelli wrong? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2011 17:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/ignatieff-resigns#IDComment148516717</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Michael Ignatieff resigns</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/ignatieff-resigns#IDComment148485847</link>
<description>Those who can, do. Those who can&amp;#039;t return to teaching - Machievelli </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 May 2011 16:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/03/ignatieff-resigns#IDComment148485847</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : And now, the exciting conclusion</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/and-now-the-exciting-conclusion#IDComment148206559</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not so sure that Ignatieff will leave so soon.  It would be wise, I think on behalf of the Liberals, to put him in front until the Conservatives are defeated in a non-confidence - at least. Give him that, then, there will be changes, CPC and Liberal. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 May 2011 19:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/02/and-now-the-exciting-conclusion#IDComment148206559</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : This consequential election</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147935214</link>
<description>Nobody cares about the low hanging fruit. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 May 2011 20:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/this-consequential-election/#IDComment147935214</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : New friends</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/new-friends#IDComment147894138</link>
<description>&amp;quot;If only you knew the power of the Dark Side. Join me and together we will rule the Galaxy!&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 May 2011 16:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/05/01/new-friends#IDComment147894138</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The NDP is bad, except when it&#039;s not</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/30/the-ndp-is-bad-except-when-its-not/#IDComment147701894</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;Canadians do not have to be concerned about Prairie NDP governments 10 years ago.&lt;/i&gt;  Finally, we have a date when we can ignore anything that happened before then as irrelevant. Thank the CPC war-room for us! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/30/the-ndp-is-bad-except-when-its-not/#IDComment147701894</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Hypotheticals</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/30/hypotheticals/#IDComment147666348</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Please sir, can I have some more?&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/30/hypotheticals/#IDComment147666348</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Conservatives no longer expect to win majority: party source</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/conservatives-no-longer-expect-to-win-majority-party-source#IDComment147371043</link>
<description>No one really disputes that we need new jets. The dispute is that we don&amp;#039;t need first attack capable stealth fighters without engines, whose cost keeps going up, which can&amp;#039;t fly anywhere on one engine anyway without re-fueling. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/conservatives-no-longer-expect-to-win-majority-party-source#IDComment147371043</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Conservatives no longer expect to win majority: party source</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/conservatives-no-longer-expect-to-win-majority-party-source#IDComment147370585</link>
<description>Only half a million? Chump change. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/29/conservatives-no-longer-expect-to-win-majority-party-source#IDComment147370585</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Is Stephen Harper a hologram?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/is-stephen-harper-a-hologram#IDComment147072219</link>
<description>Narcissistic sociopath is more likely. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/is-stephen-harper-a-hologram#IDComment147072219</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : &#039;Smiles and snake oil&#039;</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/smiles-and-snake-oil/#IDComment146856217</link>
<description>Also, no engines. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 14:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/28/smiles-and-snake-oil/#IDComment146856217</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Stephen Harper is winning (UPDATED with late-breaking uncertainty)</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/stephen-harper-is-winning#IDComment146687264</link>
<description>Responsible government. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 01:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/25/stephen-harper-is-winning#IDComment146687264</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Bernardo fan kicked out of Tory campaign</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/bernardo-fan-kicked-out-of-tory-campaign/#IDComment146284451</link>
<description>Some people are fans of psychopaths. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/bernardo-fan-kicked-out-of-tory-campaign/#IDComment146284451</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : The Bull Meter: Stephen Harper on ministerial budgets</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/the-bull-meter-stephen-harper-on-ministerial-budgets/#IDComment146282017</link>
<description>This looks like one of those things which is technically true - so it isn&amp;#039;t really bullsh!t - but it&amp;#039;s really of no value. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2011/04/26/the-bull-meter-stephen-harper-on-ministerial-budgets/#IDComment146282017</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>