<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/988762</link>
		<description>Comments by robertjwilson1</description>
<item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : 14-Year Old Talk Show Host: ‘President Obama Is Making Kids Gay’ (Video)</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/14-year-old-talk-show-host-president-obama-is-making-kids-gay/politics/2012/06/05/40747#IDComment375273257</link>
<description>When I was 14, I was a rural Southern Baptist delivering sermons on the eeeeeeevils of being gay.  Now I&amp;#039;m a staunch atheist who couldn&amp;#039;t be more thrilled to be out and proud.  This guy&amp;#039;s gayer than a goose.  He&amp;#039;ll be hitting all of WV&amp;#039;s gay hot spots (snork!) when he&amp;#039;s 18. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/14-year-old-talk-show-host-president-obama-is-making-kids-gay/politics/2012/06/05/40747#IDComment375273257</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Red State Progressive : Huffington Post Promotes Quackery</title>
<link>http://www.redstateprogressive.com/2010/07/huffington-post-promotes-quackery.html#IDComment124760924</link>
<description>I ignore all that crap anyhow.  Over the last several months I&amp;#039;ve noticed that I get less news from them and more from their Entertainment, Comedy and Tech sections.  That doesn&amp;#039;t mean we have to institute a full-on boycott&amp;hellip; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.redstateprogressive.com/2010/07/huffington-post-promotes-quackery.html#IDComment124760924</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Red State Progressive : Huffington Post Promotes Quackery</title>
<link>http://www.redstateprogressive.com/2010/07/huffington-post-promotes-quackery.html#IDComment124621025</link>
<description>You never really said &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; they should be avoided&amp;hellip;  What&amp;#039;s the deal? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.redstateprogressive.com/2010/07/huffington-post-promotes-quackery.html#IDComment124621025</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Watch: NOM&#039;s Greatest (Christian) Fan!</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/watch-noms-greatest-christian-fan/bigotry-watch/2010/08/17/12226#IDComment93956819</link>
<description>The &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot; excuse has worked so many times because people never make the mental leap of asking the question &amp;quot;In what context WOULD that be appropriate?&amp;quot;  Personally, I don&amp;#039;t believe the editing in any way alters the overall views spouted by this barely-coherent and clearly uninformed sheep. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/watch-noms-greatest-christian-fan/bigotry-watch/2010/08/17/12226#IDComment93956819</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Watch: NOM&#039;s Greatest (Christian) Fan!</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/watch-noms-greatest-christian-fan/bigotry-watch/2010/08/17/12226#IDComment93942087</link>
<description>Wow, what an intellectual giant&amp;hellip;  But she&amp;#039;s appropriately representative of the prevailing Christian mindset in America.  I have to say that I hate seeing clips like this so obviously edited because it gives the Right an opportunity to whip out their tired &amp;quot;You&amp;#039;re taking it out of context&amp;quot; trope.  Having access to an unedited version would be excellent, but I know it&amp;#039;s often impossible. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/watch-noms-greatest-christian-fan/bigotry-watch/2010/08/17/12226#IDComment93942087</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Secular News Daily : July 27 Atheist Cartoon: Just hold your breath</title>
<link>http://www.secularnewsdaily.com/2010/07/27/july-27-atheist-cartoon-just-hold-your-breath/#IDComment89187155</link>
<description>As a native South Louisianian and an atheist, I don&amp;#039;t quite know how to feel about this.  On the one hand, I&amp;#039;m still super-depressed at the devastation of the oil in my wetlands (sounds like a dirty euphemism&amp;hellip;), but on the other hand this is definitely a proportional illustration of religion as poison &amp;aacute; la Hitchens.    Political cartoons are supposed to be thought-provoking, so mission accomplished. :-D </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.secularnewsdaily.com/2010/07/27/july-27-atheist-cartoon-just-hold-your-breath/#IDComment89187155</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DesignCrave : Alternative Poster For Tom Ford&#039;s A Single Man</title>
<link>http://designcrave.com/2009-12-10/alternative-poster-for-tom-fords-a-single-man/#IDComment85249801</link>
<description>The deceptively simple poster above does a far superior job of capturing the spirit of &amp;quot;A Single Man&amp;quot; than the offensively straight-washed versions featuring Firth and Moore lying (literally and figuratively) together.  I&amp;#039;m smitten with the design and regret that it wasn&amp;#039;t used as part of a more accurate marketing campaign for an otherwise wonderful film. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jul 2010 04:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://designcrave.com/2009-12-10/alternative-poster-for-tom-fords-a-single-man/#IDComment85249801</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Name That Evangelical Hypocrite!</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/name-that-evangelical-hypocrite-5/legal-issues/2010/06/09/11363#IDComment79322723</link>
<description>This is a watershed moment in gay history.  Rekers&amp;#039; downfall is emblematic of the open hypocrisy and base evil of the FRC and its philosophy of hate and rank deceit. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/name-that-evangelical-hypocrite-5/legal-issues/2010/06/09/11363#IDComment79322723</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Name That Evangelical Hypocrite!</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/name-that-evangelical-hypocrite-3/legal-issues/2010/05/26/11129#IDComment77238995</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not surprised.  He&amp;#039;s married to a drag queen for cryin&amp;#039; out loud!! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 20:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/name-that-evangelical-hypocrite-3/legal-issues/2010/05/26/11129#IDComment77238995</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Tweet Of The Day: &quot;Gay Marriage Should Not Be Aloud!&quot;</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/tweet-of-the-day-gay-marriage-should-not-be-aloud/bigotry-watch/2010/04/29/10439#IDComment71333423</link>
<description>&amp;quot;No offense to anyone.&amp;quot;  Thanks for clearing that up; I was worried you were trying to offend both my sense of individual liberty and personal literacy.  But since you said &amp;quot;No offense&amp;quot;, everything you said prior is totally okay.  LOL! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/tweet-of-the-day-gay-marriage-should-not-be-aloud/bigotry-watch/2010/04/29/10439#IDComment71333423</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>