<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/818122</link>
		<description>Comments by Rick Caird</description>
<item>
<title>Daily Camera.com: : Editorial: A spectacularly bad idea from Jared Polis - Boulder Daily Camera</title>
<link>http://www.dailycamera.com/editorials/ci_28802714/editorial-spectacularly-bad-idea-from-jared-polis#IDComment994978605</link>
<description>Well, there is only a 20-30% chance that Polis is a fool.  But, that should be enough to remove him from Congress. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 02:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dailycamera.com/editorials/ci_28802714/editorial-spectacularly-bad-idea-from-jared-polis#IDComment994978605</guid>
</item><item>
<title>InvestorPlace : 7 Generous Dividend Stocks Giving Big Cash Back to Shareholders</title>
<link>http://investorplace.com/2013/11/7-generous-blue-chip-dividend-stocks/#IDComment747352851</link>
<description>LTS.TO  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://investorplace.com/2013/11/7-generous-blue-chip-dividend-stocks/#IDComment747352851</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Who Created the Gerrymandered Media?</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/13/who-created-the-gerrymandered-media-liberal-bias/#IDComment734791863</link>
<description>That is why academia and the non profit professions can be so liberal:  they have limited experience with the real world. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/13/who-created-the-gerrymandered-media-liberal-bias/#IDComment734791863</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Who Created the Gerrymandered Media?</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/13/who-created-the-gerrymandered-media-liberal-bias/#IDComment734791491</link>
<description>Ya&amp;#039; think the stench might rub off on the fish?  Good point. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/13/who-created-the-gerrymandered-media-liberal-bias/#IDComment734791491</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : The Obama Backfire </title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/09/the-obama-backfire/#IDComment732835785</link>
<description>Roger, please understand the topic before making silly comments.  The only way to defund the whole ObamaCare deal is to repeal ObamaCare.  However, the last CR contained funding for ObamaCare that was not in the original legislation.  The Republicans do not want to continue that additional funding in this CR.    That is as clear as I can be.  If you still do not understand it, well, there is nothing more I can do or at least am willing to do. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/09/the-obama-backfire/#IDComment732835785</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : The Obama Backfire </title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/09/the-obama-backfire/#IDComment732743739</link>
<description>Still Sorry for you Rodger.  But ACA may be the law, but any new funding for this pack of lies which is ObamaCare still has to go through the House.  They are choosing not to fund anything that was not funded in the original bill.  So, ObamaCare may be the law, but where it is short on funding, it needs new appropriations.      I do think, Rodger, that you are confused.  The Republicans are not trying (right now) to repeal ObamaCare.  They are trying to  not throw additional funding down the rat hole.   I suggest you educate yourself on what is being fought over.  It is additional funding that needs to be appropriated annually. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/09/the-obama-backfire/#IDComment732743739</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : The Obama Backfire </title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/09/the-obama-backfire/#IDComment732717196</link>
<description>Silly Roger.  The House may have voted for ObamaCare, but Pelosi lost the House because of those votes.  The Republicans took control with an anti ObamaCare message, so it is beyond stupid to think they should just roll over because the Pelosi House passed it.  In fact, all these votes Reid is forcing his caucus to take may well end up costing him his Senate majority leader post.    Besides, Roberts only ruled the mandate involved a tax, not a penalty.  I think he is wrong because if it is a tax, it is an unapportioned tax which is unconstitutional.  He was not asked to rule on any other part of ObamaCare, so to say it was approved by the Supreme Court is a bridge way too far.  In fact, the Supreme Court did rule the whole Medicaid threat was &amp;quot;not approved&amp;quot;.    </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/09/the-obama-backfire/#IDComment732717196</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : The Obama Backfire </title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/09/the-obama-backfire/#IDComment732714407</link>
<description>Agreed.  And, by the time we get to 2014 elections, the hot buttone will not be the debt ceiling or the CR, it will be how the candidate voted on ObamaCare.  And, this intransigence by Obama and Reid is forcing red state Senators up fo relection to vote for ObamaCare.  That is not such a good place to be.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/10/09/the-obama-backfire/#IDComment732714407</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Heritage Foundry : Senator Feinstein to Homeland Security: Stop Enforcing Immigration Law</title>
<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2013/09/06/senator-feinstein-to-napolitano-stop-enforcing-immigration-law/#IDComment715928184</link>
<description>What a strange position.  A sitting legislator is advocating that laws be ignored.   Can I ignore laws I don&amp;#039;t like, too.    That should be impeachable and Feinstein should resign.  What is the point of having her as a legislator? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Sep 2013 19:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.heritage.org/2013/09/06/senator-feinstein-to-napolitano-stop-enforcing-immigration-law/#IDComment715928184</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Tea Party Economist : Connecticut: &quot;No Guns, No Gold&quot;</title>
<link>http://teapartyeconomist.com/2013/04/26/connecticut-no-guns-no-gold/#IDComment628577838</link>
<description>Connecticut seems to forget it is a small state.  It is not difficult to go to a neighboring state or the Internet to buy those items.  It appears Connecticut is a state run by idiots.  Anarchy would be preferable to government by those clowns. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://teapartyeconomist.com/2013/04/26/connecticut-no-guns-no-gold/#IDComment628577838</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : The Age of Hope and Shame</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/04/22/the-age-of-hope-and-shame/#IDComment626289785</link>
<description>OK, Conservatives can easily point to the availability of drugs causing more addiction.   Addiction causes more crime.  There are valid reasons to prohibit drugs.  That does not mean that prohibition is necessarily good, but it is not self-righteousness as you suppose.  Does anyone really think drug addiction is a good thing? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/04/22/the-age-of-hope-and-shame/#IDComment626289785</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Perfect Example of Why New York Is the &quot;Least Free&quot; State</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/03/29/perfect-example-of-why-new-york-is-the-least-free-state/#IDComment607648961</link>
<description>OH, and I notice every one of your comments has been an ad hominem.  You did not address a single of the issues that were raised. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/03/29/perfect-example-of-why-new-york-is-the-least-free-state/#IDComment607648961</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Perfect Example of Why New York Is the &quot;Least Free&quot; State</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/03/29/perfect-example-of-why-new-york-is-the-least-free-state/#IDComment607647964</link>
<description>What part of state and local elections refer to Social Security and Medicare?  The answer is none.  I see you are one of those lefties who suffer from terminal reading comprehension difficulties. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/03/29/perfect-example-of-why-new-york-is-the-least-free-state/#IDComment607647964</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Perfect Example of Why New York Is the &quot;Least Free&quot; State</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/03/29/perfect-example-of-why-new-york-is-the-least-free-state/#IDComment607602591</link>
<description>But so many of these New Yorkers move to Florida and vote for the same idiotic policies that destroyed New York State.  We need a 10 year residency requirement before these &amp;quot;immigrants&amp;quot; can vote in state or local elections.  Or, maybe we need &amp;quot;reeducation camps&amp;quot; for them.    Seriously, though, it is very frustrating to watch people move from failing states and then wonder why they can&amp;#039;t get all the &amp;quot;free stuff&amp;quot; they got before. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 16:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/03/29/perfect-example-of-why-new-york-is-the-least-free-state/#IDComment607602591</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Conservatives and Collapsing Trust in Government   </title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/03/18/conservatives-and-collapsing-trust-in-government/#IDComment600134233</link>
<description>Lefty&amp;#039;s like to pull out a name and blame that name for all the trouble.  Are you sure the problem is not the Koch brothers?    In any case, if someone wants to run on a &amp;quot;no tax&amp;quot; pledge and seeks Norquist&amp;#039;s endorsement, then we expect him to honor his pledge just as we expect any politician (except Obama) to honor his pledge.  Your problem is not with Norquist.  Your problem is with us, the great unwashed, who want to fight any tax increases and in fact lower the scope and cost of government. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/03/18/conservatives-and-collapsing-trust-in-government/#IDComment600134233</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Are We Repeating the Mistakes of the &quot;Peace Dividend?&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/02/28/are-we-repeating-the-mistakes-of-the-peace-dividend/#IDComment581574935</link>
<description>No bargaining and no drug imports were the price the administration offered pharma not to oppose ObamaCare.  While we all know this Obama feels free to break any bargain he ever makes, this is probably not the time to do it. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Mar 2013 03:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2013/02/28/are-we-repeating-the-mistakes-of-the-peace-dividend/#IDComment581574935</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Heritage Foundry : Union That Bankrupted Hostess to Receive Generous Government Subsidies</title>
<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2013/02/21/union-that-bankrupted-hostess-to-receive-generous-government-subsidies/#IDComment578451437</link>
<description>This government is so corrupt it cannot continue.  We seem to have gotten Chicago politics in all its glory.  Who could have predicted that? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.heritage.org/2013/02/21/union-that-bankrupted-hostess-to-receive-generous-government-subsidies/#IDComment578451437</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Kristof in the Dark</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/11/25/kristof-in-the-dark/#IDComment501709104</link>
<description>I would add, too,Georg, that it is much cheaper to bury when the housing is being built rather than to come back later and do it.  Second, buried wires are not without their own set of problems.  For example, it is much harder to find a break in the wire and the wired could be flooded and shorted.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/11/25/kristof-in-the-dark/#IDComment501709104</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Kristof in the Dark</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/11/25/kristof-in-the-dark/#IDComment501707171</link>
<description>Te more interesting question, Alison, is to ask if the NYT has any standards or expectations for its columnists.  For example. does the NYT expect that its columnist be able to differentiate between a customer supported public utility and a tax supported service? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/11/25/kristof-in-the-dark/#IDComment501707171</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Commentary Magazine : Kristof in the Dark</title>
<link>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/11/25/kristof-in-the-dark/#IDComment501705230</link>
<description>Maybe, Kristoff really planned to suggest we tax the rich, so the government can provide everyone with a generator.  /sarc </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/11/25/kristof-in-the-dark/#IDComment501705230</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>