IntenseDebate - rantalbott

10 years ago @ Birther Report - Arpaio Informant: Obam... · 0 replies · +2 points

Since he ruled over two years ago that Arpaio was guilty of racial profiling, I'd say he has whatever is required.

10 years ago @ Birther Report - Arpaio Informant: Obam... · 0 replies · +3 points

If they were ever mad, watching your desperate flailing would certainly have cured them of it. Too bad for you they're not making Keystone Kops films anymore: you could've been a star.

"But they haven't. "
And your evidence for that would be?

"otherwise you are just a stooge dumbass working FOR FREE"
Mmm, no. One would think that, by now, you would be accustomed to discovering that there are many possibilities in the universe that you hadn't thought of.

10 years ago @ Birther Report - Arpaio Informant: Obam... · 0 replies · +3 points

The photocopies are at higher reslution than the PDF, and show details the PDF doesn't. Neither they, nor Guthrie's cellphone photos, show the artifacts produced by the Xerox when it created the PDF.

"The pdf was man made."
You've had almost five years, and no one has even shown that that's possible, much less true.

"However the earliest available forgery image shows in it's properties that it was in Adobe Photoshop minutes after the gaggle started. "
Nope. Again, after almost five years, no one has been able to show any characteristic of the file consistent with its being processed by any Adobe software.

You can lie all you want, but you can't change the verifiable facts.

10 years ago @ Birther Report - Arpaio Informant: Obam... · 0 replies · +6 points

Nice to see that the effort to get more grade schools connected to the Internet is bearing fruit...

10 years ago @ Birther Report - Arpaio Informant: Obam... · 0 replies · +5 points

So, someone cuts-and-pastes together a bunch of hoaxes that were exposed years ago, passes them off as "news", and a bunch of loons fall for it.

That does "explain" some things, but not the ones you thought it did.

10 years ago @ Birther Report - Arpaio Informant: Obam... · 3 replies · +11 points

Actually, it was Arpaio and Zullo who were "outed", as gullible fools: Monty just took the whois info from the wrong domain name, sprinkled a little bogus info (which could have been easily checked to discover it was fake) on it, and convinced them he was a brilliant hacker who had done the impossible.

And, far from panicking, RC has been in "uproarious laughter" mode with the rest of the reality-based community.

10 years ago @ Birther Report - Arpaio Informant: Obam... · 2 replies · +8 points

Mmm, no: you can't rescind what doesn't exist.

10 years ago @ Birther Report - Arpaio Informant: Obam... · 0 replies · +7 points

Even in Birtherstan, 50.4% is "less than 51%". Look it up.

And the point of the BC investigation was to generate publicity, and to raise the campaign funds he needed to outspend his opponent by about 2-to-1: http://video.phoenixnewtimes.com/joe-arpaio-boast...

You're obviously not familiar with the fact that Arpaio's antics have cost the county so much that they've had to raise property taxes. His opponents won't even need to hire professionals to do their commercials: they can just get a sharp high school kid to make a video with a scrolling list of the millions the county has paid out for his screw-ups.

10 years ago @ Birther Report - Watch Live: Pro-Birthe... · 0 replies · +2 points

No, taking money that Congress has appropriated for foreign aid, and using it for a massive capital project they haven't approved, is unconstitutional. Read much?

And so are:
1. Abrogating treaties.
2. Imposing taxes or tariffs by executive order.
3. Exiling American citizens to foreign countries.

Just to name a few of Trump's "solutions"...

10 years ago @ Birther Report - Watch Live: Pro-Birthe... · 2 replies · +3 points

Yes, it''s interesting how many of Trump's "solutions" require the suspension of the Constitution, isn't it?

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with rantalbott

People I'm following

rantalbott