This was an attack by Hillary to try and take the focus off of her health. Trump hasn't changed his opinion. But Obama isn't running. Those like us the know the facts (and have actually studied the false BC in Photoshop) are already voting for Trump. He has NOTHING to gain by discussing anything at this point other than slamming the door so it can't be opened. Any other statement would have continued to put barriers up for the undecideds who will NEVER get the facts since the MSM that brainwashes them will NEVER validate the issue.
I'm personally disappointed not only because Trump had to lie to shut that door, but because it does discourage those of us (less than 6% of the electorate by numbers btw) to whom this is important. But the bigger issue is getting into office. His advisers like Stone have stated repeatedly that Trump is aware of the real issues and not only that - won't just drop it once he gets into office.
Wisely, DJT saying this may also lull the idiots who are complicit in this hoax into thinking they are safe.
But although it makes me sick to my stomach - it's probably the right move especially if they had internal polls that it may stop the Hillary erosion crashing around her.
I listened to that interview mostly dumbfounded that Sellin/Boyles had such a problem with Arpaio/Zullo using Gallups as a mouthpiece. - Listen, I have LOTS of problems with Gallups. It seems everything is "breaking news" (when it isn't) and his coverage of even basic issues (like science) are ridiculous. But I don't think he is evil, or malicious. When Boyles asked why Arpaio would use a "talk show Pastor" to give updates, it revealed to me the underlying jealousy that is blinding him. CLEARLY Gallup has a relationship with Zulllo because he is on ALL the time. CLEARLY Zullo is is part of Arpaio's braintrust since Arpaio uses him as his primary media (and lobbyist) conduit. It's indisputable. WHY would Boyles/Sellin even care? And why demean someone who was after the same thing? I just don't understand why it is necessary to focus on each other who have the same goal, and shoot each other - letting the real criminals grin with glee and get away with murder. Grow up people. All of you.
2 things. First go take a course in statistical analysis. Second, learn how to spell. Then get back with me.
I called 4 of my friends. 3 said I'm the smartest guy they know. So you think it would be ok to post an article saying 75% think PolitiJim is the smartest person in the world? This battle is tough enough without playing dishonest games the other side uses. Just add "Web poll" and I have no issue. But you clearly have never been in the marketing or statistical analysis business if you infer that NO POLL can't suggest a general view of an issue. True - there is no poll that is 100% accurate - but we don't need them to be. The real truth is the majority Americans still have never even heard the evidence to determine whether O is a citizen or not. So saying "70% think O is not a citizen," is meaningless. If you want to say "70% believe O not citizen after watching a Canadian TV segment" I'm fine with it. But as I said earlier - too many already have a sense that birthers don't have the facts behind them. So putting a blatantly false headline only increases the wall we have to get over.
I'm a huge fan of this site. But that title is misleading and not honest - leaving the birther movement open to ridicule. 70% of viewers of a birther skewed discussion on a web poll doesn't really tell us anything. I'm happy the "discussion" got out there - but it was hardly a exhaustive (or insightful in my opinion) piece. Just my opinion.
It might be better to stay away from theology if you distort simple stories so badly.
Romans says that righteousness of God is to all and on all[h] who believe. Pope Francis says that " if you go to him with a sincere and contrite heart" you are forgiven. That means you no longer are in unbelief. He did it for His disciple Peter who not only didn't believe - but he publicly denied Him - which Jesus had already said would discount someone from receiving Jesus's grace before the father.
What the Pope did NOT say (and what you are erroneously inferring) is that those who STAY in unbelief will somehow be accept to heaven.
(Next time you might want to actually pray about what you think before you write.)
Interesting. I'm assuming you only lose your citizenship rights of statehood?
Please note he is a Bulls fan. Kind of offsets the "golfing on the job" of the most powerful one in DC.
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
politijim 
Branch