Brian;

You said:
"#1. There is no law that requires an individual who is running for president to provide his or her birth certificate to the public for public scrutiny before or after one runs for president."

You are absolutely incorrect here. The Supreme Law of the Land, The Constitution of the U.S., says that to qualify for the Office of POTUS, one must be at least 35 years of age and a natural born Citizen (plus 14 years resident, but Muslim John Brennan took care of hiding that one when he confiscated Obama's passport records) ... and the only way to show 'quo warranto' for the position is to provide a bona fide, non-forged, lawfully certified under seal, Certificate of Live Birth.

So stop with the argument of 'no birth certificate required' already.

Sorry. That should read:
www.TinyURL.com/TreasonousCo-Conspirator (not plural, with an 'S')

Charles appears to be an agent provocateur:

1. A 'Birther' is someone who questions Obama's 'birth narrative', and when the 'Liar In Chief' provides only forensically-proven-to-be forged and fabricated documents as a 'birth narrative', then anyone who claims to not be a 'birther' must therefore be a co-conspirator (i.e. agent provocateur) in the treasonous usurpation of the Office of POTUS.

2. To repeatedly say that one has 'earth-shaking' info that they can release on the usurper - and still be alive to talk about it - lends further proof of their 'agent provocateur-ship';

3. After providing much proof of Obama's bungled photo-shopping, but no proof of his repeated statement that Obama was born in Hawaii, one can only conclude that Charles is a titillating agent provocateur;

TREASON!

It is an act of TREASON for an unknown entity and admitted non-natural born Citizen of the U.S. to usurp the Office of President of the United States using proven-to-be forged ID’s (Certificate of Birth & Selective Service Registration) and a self-published SS# 042-68-4425 that fails the government’s own E-Verify and SS# Verification systems for employment in the United States.

Paying homage to and legitimization of that unknown and undocumented entity who uses forged and stolen identification documents, by calling him ‘The President’, is to be knowingly complicit in that act of TREASON!

Therefore anyone who calls that undocumented entity ‘President’ becomes him or herself a Treasonous Co-Conspirator! (www.TinyURL.com/TreasonousCo-Conspirators).

4.
Nwankpa v. Kissinger, 376 F. Supp. 122
-- Same argument, as above. NBC issue was not adjudicated here.

5.
> Vattel's book The Law of Nations, by the way, recommends that every
>country establish a state religion and force people who do not join it
> to leave the country. In that book Vattel never recommends that the leaders of
> a country should be even citizens much less two-parent-citizen citizens.
> He gives several examples of countries picking their sovereigns from the
> nobility of other countries, and he never says that that is a bad thing.
> The source of the term "Natural Born" in Natural Born Citizen comes from the
> Common Law, which should be obvious since about 70% of the writers of
> the Constitution were lawyers and jurists.

3.
Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156

Again, there are ancillary references to citizen-offspring in this case
which has to do with the deportation of an illegal alien father, citizen
mother and citizen-children.

"The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this
court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two
children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born
citizens of the United States."

and...

"Petitioner's two children, who are citizens of the United States
certainly had legal rights to due process of law. The petition for
review has merit and the children and their father and mother would have
been subjected to extreme hardship if petitioner had been deported
without an evidentiary hearing and an appropriate adjudication of the
merits to which he and his wife and children were entitled."

The Natural Born Citizen status of the children was not a legally substantive
part of the case. Indeed, at no point in the case was the subject under
review nor argued by either side. Such a statement found in the Summary
areas of Appellete reviews are ancillary at best.

"Granite"

1.
> > You are wrong. The citizenship of a parent does not affect the Natural
> Born Citizen status of a child born in the USA (except for the children of
> foreign diplomats). That is why Obama's election was confirmed UNANIMOUSLY
> by the US Congress, and that is why not one member of Congress has called
> for an investigation either of Obama's place of birth (which was Hawaii) or
> of his Natural Born Citizen status.

To create a nexus between your claim that parental citizenship and the
NBC status of off-spring, and your claim that it is for that reason that
Congress affirmed the Electoral College votes and why no member of
Congress has yet to call for an investigation, requires proof of that
nexus.

Please provide a statement made by any government official affirming the
sequitur. As of this date, all of our combined researchers have found no
such claim of relationship.

Patriot35 continued:

Now go read this report on a recent Sedition & Treason Trial to see what charges have been filed against the Usurper for taking over our Government while knowingly not being eligible because he is not a 'Natural Born Citizen':
CIA-Obama Sedition Trial-ATLAH http://www.scribd.com/doc/31895222/CIA-Obama-Sedi...

Finally, Mr. Adams is dead wrong when at 8:45 into the clip he says: it is wrong to deny someone to be eligible to be President simply because one of their parents was not born a U.S. citizen. The only requirement is that BOTH PARENTS (even single-parent families have TWO parents to start with) MUST BE U.S. CITIZENS at the time of the child's birth. They can be natural-born, native-born, or naturalized foreign-born. Nothing more, nothing less.

BTW, this is derived from 3 simple items:
1. Article II says he must be 'Natural Born' (try to say it out loud. This is important);
2. Article I, Section 8 says that Congress must perform according to the Law of Nations (written by de Vattel, 20 years before the Constitution was written, and is the foundational treatise on which it was written);
3. The Law of Nations says that TO BE NATURAL BORN, ONE MUST BE BORN OF PARENTS, BOTH OF WHOM ARE CITIZENS.

Patriot35-continued:
Mr. Adams poses the question of whether or not the DNC properly vetted their candidate. Being a teacher at a University, I would assume that he has the skills to research and discover the fraudulent notarized documents submitted by Nancy Pelosi concerning this, with different documents going to Hawaii than those going to all the other States. (see it here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/31947612/DNC-Chairperso.... He can answer his own question, and never have to pose such a ridiculous rhetorical question again.