<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/820779</link>
		<description>Comments by Matthew G. Saroff</description>
<item>
<title>Information Clearing House - News you won&#039;t find on CNN : Washington and NATO&rsquo;s New Surrealpolitik</title>
<link>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article38183.htm#IDComment816368585</link>
<description>Remember when Ron Suskind quoted an anonymous Bush aide, &amp;quot;The aide said that guys like me were &amp;#039;&amp;#039;in what we call the reality-based community,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; which he defined as people who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;That&amp;#039;s not the way the world really works anymore,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; he continued. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;We&amp;#039;re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you&amp;#039;re studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we&amp;#039;ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that&amp;#039;s how things will sort out. We&amp;#039;re history&amp;#039;s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;   Well, it looks like applies to Obama as well. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article38183.htm#IDComment816368585</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Could the F-35B Really Be Cut?</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/11/15/could-the-f-35b-really-be-cut/#IDComment109983819</link>
<description>If it had not included a STOVL version, it would be made by Boeing.   It was STOVL performance that won the competition for Lockheed. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 00:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/11/15/could-the-f-35b-really-be-cut/#IDComment109983819</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Supreme Court Takes Up A-12 Case</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/09/28/supreme-court-takes-up-a-12-case/#IDComment101411802</link>
<description>The state secrets principle is not a bedrock legal principle.  It is a lie based on a lie.  You can &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/United_States_v._Reynolds&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;US v Reynolds&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/09/28/supreme-court-takes-up-a-12-case/#IDComment101411802</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Nuke Cheating Scandal?</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/09/23/nuke-cheating-scandal/#IDComment101076984</link>
<description>As to the story of Rickover requiring someone to break off an engagment, the version I heard, from a Naval Nuke, was that someone was being interviewed by Rickover as a potential entrant, and told to pick up a phone and call it off then and there.  He did, and asked if he got in, and Rickover sayd, &amp;quot;Not in my navy,&amp;quot; so he asked if he could call again, because he was sure that the guy at the pizza shop was wicked confused.   The candidate was accepted to the nuclear program. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/09/23/nuke-cheating-scandal/#IDComment101076984</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Israel Likely to Strike Iran </title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/09/13/israel-likely-to-strike-iran/#IDComment98640425</link>
<description>Krauthammer heckeled his Rabbi on Yom Kippur when he suggested that people pray for peace in the middle east.  He is f^%$ing nuts. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/09/13/israel-likely-to-strike-iran/#IDComment98640425</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Army Abruptly Cancels Ground Combat Vehicle Competition (Updated)</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/08/25/army-cancels-ground-combat-vehicle-gcv-competition/#IDComment95264207</link>
<description>I forgot to add.  When their requirements had a submission tipping the scale at 70+ tons, it was time to try again. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 04:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/08/25/army-cancels-ground-combat-vehicle-gcv-competition/#IDComment95264207</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Army Sending Precision Grenade Launcher to Afghanistan</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/05/06/army-sending-precision-grenade-launcher-to-afghanistan/#IDComment73579026</link>
<description>Shades of the Russian experience in Afghanistan, where they came to rely heavily on AGS-17 repeating grenade launcher. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 May 2010 01:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/05/06/army-sending-precision-grenade-launcher-to-afghanistan/#IDComment73579026</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : JSF Faces Fire Risk: Head Tester</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/11/jsf-faces-fire-risk-head-tester/#IDComment61787709</link>
<description>Their first priority is to get a lucrative consulting gig after they retire. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/03/11/jsf-faces-fire-risk-head-tester/#IDComment61787709</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>