<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1330961</link>
		<description>Comments by montanamiles</description>
<item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Benghazi Investigator Slams America and &#039;Islamophobes&#039;</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2012/matthew-vadum/benghazi-investigator-slams-america-islamophobes/#IDComment479241610</link>
<description>So the fox put another fox in as lead investigator and he blames we the people in nearly the same way that the video was originally used to blame for the attack in Benghazi. Time to catch the fox by the tail, or should that be tale, and throw him out of office. Time to vote Obama out. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Nov 2012 05:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2012/matthew-vadum/benghazi-investigator-slams-america-islamophobes/#IDComment479241610</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Benghazigate: General Ham: &quot;No Order to Protect Consulate&quot; (VIDEO)</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/benghazigate-general-ham-no-order-to-protect-consulate-video/#IDComment477177377</link>
<description>MUST WATCH: Rush military caller says beyond shadow of doubt Obama knew about Benghazi attack and ordered no response  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.therightscoop.com/must-watch-rush-military-caller-says-beyond-a-shadow-of-a-doubt-obama-knew-about-benghazi-attack-ordered-no-response/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.therightscoop.com/must-watch-rush-mili...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/benghazigate-general-ham-no-order-to-protect-consulate-video/#IDComment477177377</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : The Tiny Little Imprisoned Minds That Bring You the News</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2010/09/01/the-tiny-little-imprisoned-minds-that-bring-you-the-news/#IDComment96470209</link>
<description>The Huffington post is like one hand clapping in the wind.  One hand just goes through the air, not striking the other hand and therefore does not make the noise of a hand clap.  You see one hand or one point of view is all that is allowed in the Huffington post comment sections.    Don&amp;#039;t believe me try posting something of knowledge that contradicts a Huffington story or article in their comment section; odds are  the contradicting knowledgeable comment will not be published as the Huffington post agree with the Obama administration in the knowledge of free speech.   One hand clapping in the wind. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Sep 2010 19:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2010/09/01/the-tiny-little-imprisoned-minds-that-bring-you-the-news/#IDComment96470209</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Leftist Elitism: Nancy Pelosi&#039;s Proposed Investigation of Ground Zero Mosque Opponents</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310781</link>
<description>Nancy not sure if you got that last investigative tip.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=181405&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=181405&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310781</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Leftist Elitism: Nancy Pelosi&#039;s Proposed Investigation of Ground Zero Mosque Opponents</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310631</link>
<description>Nancy is there anyone else besides the above that needs investigation? Wait Nancy there is; these congressman will help you with that investigation . . .  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=181405&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=181405&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310631</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Leftist Elitism: Nancy Pelosi&#039;s Proposed Investigation of Ground Zero Mosque Opponents</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310555</link>
<description>Whew another one to investigate, wow, from article; Judicial Watch, which investigates and prosecutes government corruption, show that the Pelosi incurred expenses of some $2.1 million for her . . .  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ihatethemedia.com/nancy-pelosi-jet-fueled-by-alcohol-and-lots-of-it&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.ihatethemedia.com/nancy-pelosi-jet-fue...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310555</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Leftist Elitism: Nancy Pelosi&#039;s Proposed Investigation of Ground Zero Mosque Opponents</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310491</link>
<description>Nancy you have a lot of investigation in front of you, here is another one; from article,every trip costs 300,000 dollars.She could use a cheaper plane but insisted on the most expensive, . . .  &lt;a href=&quot;http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090128050702AAScO1T&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310491</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Leftist Elitism: Nancy Pelosi&#039;s Proposed Investigation of Ground Zero Mosque Opponents</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310429</link>
<description>Nancy another one to investigate. 20 congressman being taken to Copenhagen on tax payer money? . . .  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1209/Pelosi_taking_20_House_members_to_Copenhagen.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1209/Pe...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310429</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Leftist Elitism: Nancy Pelosi&#039;s Proposed Investigation of Ground Zero Mosque Opponents</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310375</link>
<description>Nancy I found a situation that really needs your investigative skills.  An analysis of e-mail exchanges between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi&amp;rsquo;s (D-CA) office and the Pentagon shows that Pelosi aggressively abused her privilege as Speaker to travel on military aircraft. From following link . . .   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/03/11/report-shows-nancy-pelosi-abused-military-plane-privileges/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/03/11/report-sh...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 05:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/19/leftist-elitism-nancy-pelosis-proposed-investigation-of-ground-zero-mosque-opponents/#IDComment94310375</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : White House:  Obama has No Regrets for Mosque Comments</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-no-regrets-for-mosque-comments/#IDComment94199004</link>
<description>President Obama states that a Christian can&amp;#039;t speak at the Pentagon during the National Day of Prayer as his words might be offensive to Muslims. With no regrets the President thinks nothing of the offensiveness to 9/11 victims as he shows his bias respect toward the Muslim religion basically stating Muslims should be able to build their mosque in the Ground Zero area. An are that was destroyed by, what happened to sensitivity?  President Obama use the sensitivity that you reserve for the Muslim faith and apply it to the 9/11 victims; Mr. President no mosque in the Ground Zero area.  Notice the sensitivity of the Imam that proposes building a mosque at the Ground Zero area; do you see his views on Muslim governance.  .   .   .   &lt;a href=&quot;http://bigpeace.com/files/2010/08/http___174.132.114.190_arkdev__qcontent_shariah-index-project.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://bigpeace.com/files/2010/08/http___174.132....&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-no-regrets-for-mosque-comments/#IDComment94199004</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : White House:  Obama has No Regrets for Mosque Comments</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-no-regrets-for-mosque-comments/#IDComment94198672</link>
<description>Lessons from The Founding Fathers .  .  .  Most of The Founding Fathers were Christian. However they freed this nation, the United States of America from the dictates of England.  One of those dictates we were freed from, a favored religion by government.  The Founding Fathers knew that the government could and did influence people in an adverse way when the government proposed one religion over another or one Christian or Jewish sect over another Christian or Jewish sect.  The Founding Fathers stated Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. Meaning that the United states shall not have a national religion; see, The Bill of Rights.  Today  President Obama states that a main goal of the government agency NASA is to reach out to Islam. .  .  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/obamas-new-mission-for-nasa-reach-out-to-muslim-world-97785979.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/b...&lt;/a&gt;  What about reaching out to Christians on an equal basis, The Bill of Rights?  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-no-regrets-for-mosque-comments/#IDComment94198672</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Job-Gate Lives! Clinton Denies Asking Sestak To Drop Out (Update: New Video)</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jdunetz/2010/08/12/job-gate-lives-clinton-denies-asking-sestak-to-drop-out/#IDComment92797645</link>
<description>So who is telling the truth? Is it Obama or is it Clinton? Wow, that would be something if Clinton is telling the truth and he had nothing to do with what the White House accused him of! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jdunetz/2010/08/12/job-gate-lives-clinton-denies-asking-sestak-to-drop-out/#IDComment92797645</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Daily Camera: Letters to the Editor : Otto A. Friedli: Oil spill: The smell test</title>
<link>http://camera-letterstotheeditor.pmpblogs.com/2010/08/04/otto-a-friedli-oil-spill-the-smell-test/#IDComment91667789</link>
<description>When the Government should have scientists via CDC test the fish for contaminants, with tests verified by independent labs.    Instead the Obama administration once again simply inserts their nose into the business of someone else.  Now the Government is not only making cars, it&amp;#039;s smelling fish!  Will there be an official Obama Government smell test label attached to fish sold to the public? Maybe the Federal Government can put some people to work designing the label? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Aug 2010 02:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://camera-letterstotheeditor.pmpblogs.com/2010/08/04/otto-a-friedli-oil-spill-the-smell-test/#IDComment91667789</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Ahmadinejad says Iran building three-stage rocket</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.1fdd62d1d5fae296fbd87d17e1df4c8e.3e1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment91190558</link>
<description>Is the Obama administration thinking about sending Obama back over to Iran to give__Ahm_______ another big hug so as to stop Ahm from building the three stage rocket? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Aug 2010 13:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.1fdd62d1d5fae296fbd87d17e1df4c8e.3e1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment91190558</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Impeach Obama Campaign : Oil Spill: The Video Obama Doesn’t Want you to See</title>
<link>http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/oil-spill-the-video-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-see/#IDComment88959450</link>
<description>In watching the video we see the fox that broke the eggs in charge of the hen house clean up.  Problem is the fox, BP, has feathers on its face. In BP&amp;#039;s case it is not feathers but instead oil polluting the gulf.  The video further shows that BP hassles people with cameras.   The accompanying article asks why so long a time for BP to respond to oil crisis. Also why hasn&amp;#039;t Obama done something on a timely basis to address the oil spill.  One answer Obama in the 2008 campaign for President received financial support from BP. view . . .   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/23/palin-links-bp-donations-obama-explain-gulf-spill-response/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/23/palin-...&lt;/a&gt;    Go to the Webster Dictionary look up the term bribe.  From definition the following money or favor given to a person to influence conduct.   Could this be why it took Obama so long to react to the oil spill? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/oil-spill-the-video-obama-doesnt-want-you-to-see/#IDComment88959450</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Expose Obama : Hawaii Election Clerk story grows on YouTube</title>
<link>http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/06/14/hawaii-election-clerk-story-grows-on-youtube/#IDComment85138970</link>
<description>I am amazed! The clerk states that he has access to all records and as found there is no U.S. birth certificate for Obama.  He than states Obama had to be born outside the U.S.! The live birth certificate was given because Obama was born somewhere outside the U.S.    The clerk goes on to state he has a friend that can&amp;#039;t run for President because he does not meet the Constitutional requirement while at the same time he is stating that Obama can do what his friend can&amp;#039;t! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.exposeobama.com/2010/06/14/hawaii-election-clerk-story-grows-on-youtube/#IDComment85138970</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Impeach Obama Campaign : Video: Hawaiian Election Official Appears on TV Affirming Obama&#039;s non-Hawaiian Birth</title>
<link>http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/video-hawaiian-election-official-appears-on-tv-affirming-obamas-non-hawaiian-birth/#IDComment85096842</link>
<description>In the video the clerk states no big deal Obama not born in the United States!   Our founding fathers stated that as part of the U.S. Constitution the President must be born in the U.S.A. In order  to be President a person must meet all the criteria of the United States law with respect to the law of being born in the United States.   The founding fathers created this law so that our nation would not bow down to a foreign power and or country. So that a foreign power would not be able to put their dictates over the people of the U.S.A. in the form of one of their personages.  Some historians also state that the founding fathers were concerned that someone not born in the U.S.A. would not have a natural affection for the land and people of the U.S.A. and thereby not be inclined to watch out for the welfare of the people and the land as would a natual born citizen of the United States.  If what this clerk states is true then Obama must be removed from office via impeachment to maintain the U.S. Constitution. A clerk is not and his thoughts are not above Constitutional Law!  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Jul 2010 07:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/video-hawaiian-election-official-appears-on-tv-affirming-obamas-non-hawaiian-birth/#IDComment85096842</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Impeach Obama Campaign : Hawaii Election Clerk story grows on YouTube</title>
<link>http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/hawaii-election-clerk-story-grows-on-youtube/#IDComment85094917</link>
<description>Our founding fathers stated that as part of the U.S. Constitution the President must be born in the U.S.A. In order  to be President a person must meet all the criteria of the United States law with respect to the law of being born in the United States.   The founding fathers created this law so that our nation would not bow down to a foreign power and or country. So that a foreign power would not be able to put their dictates over the people of the U.S.A. in the form of one of their personages.  Some historians also state that the founding fathers were concerned that someone not born in the U.S.A. would not have a natural affection for the land and people of the U.S.A. and thereby not be inclined to watch out for the welfare of the people and the land.  Ask your state representatives,  does the President have a legitimate U.S. birth certificate? If he does let us see the legitimate U.S. birth certificate. No legal U.S. birth certificate, the requirement then is the removal from office via impeachment. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Jul 2010 07:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/hawaii-election-clerk-story-grows-on-youtube/#IDComment85094917</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Impeach Obama Campaign : Hawaii elections clerk: Obama not born here</title>
<link>http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/hawaii-elections-clerk-obama-not-born-here/#IDComment85090640</link>
<description>Obama does not have a legitimate U.S.A. birth certificate, WOW!  Our founding fathers stated that as part of the U.S. Constitution the President must be born in the U.S.A. and must meet all criteria of the United States law with respect to the law of being born in the United States.   The founding fathers created this law so that our nation would not bow down to a foreign power and or country. So that a foreign power would not be able to rule their dictates over the people of the U.S.A. in the form of one of their personages.  Some historians also state that the founding fathers were concerned that someone not born in the U.S.A. would not have a natural affection for the land and people of the U.S.A. and thereby not be inclined to watch out for the welfare of the people and the land as would a natural born citizen of the United States.  Impeachment and removal from Presidential office will now be the next step in order to maintain the rights of the people with respect to the Constitution of the United States. Other option for the President simply show us,  the people of the U.S., your  United States of America legitimate  birth certificate. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Jul 2010 06:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/hawaii-elections-clerk-obama-not-born-here/#IDComment85090640</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Product Reviews Net : Internet Kill Switch: Bill would impose limits</title>
<link>http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/06/28/internet-kill-switch-bill-would-impose-limits/#IDComment82760000</link>
<description>From what I read it is four months not  one month.  Same time until the elections in November? Internet kill bill gives Obama cyberpolice ability to shut down cyber threats; does that include U.S. citizens that disagree with Obama policies? Obama gets to decide!  The courts are the way to address this Internet kill bill.  Let the courts kill the Internet kill bill on behalf of the people of the U.S.A. and thereby stand up for free speech and the U.S. Constitution.  Note the late President Kennedy stated not to allow the government abusive rights toward citizens even when threats exist. President Kennedy stated that many politicians would promote their own agenda against U.S. citizens and for themselves if this type of legislative action was allowed to take place in the United States.  And here it is Internet kill bill! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.product-reviews.net/2010/06/28/internet-kill-switch-bill-would-impose-limits/#IDComment82760000</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>