<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/819974</link>
		<description>Comments by Stacy Drake</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Exclusive: ‘The Undefeated’ Trailer - Daughter.  Wife.  Mother.  Warrior.</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/07/07/exclusive-the-undefeated-trailer-daughter-wife-mother-warrior/#IDComment170828651</link>
<description>Bingo!  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jul 2011 22:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/07/07/exclusive-the-undefeated-trailer-daughter-wife-mother-warrior/#IDComment170828651</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Exclusive: ‘The Undefeated’ Trailer - Daughter.  Wife.  Mother.  Warrior.</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/07/07/exclusive-the-undefeated-trailer-daughter-wife-mother-warrior/#IDComment170824980</link>
<description>Looking in the mirror again? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jul 2011 22:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2011/07/07/exclusive-the-undefeated-trailer-daughter-wife-mother-warrior/#IDComment170824980</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Reject, Don&#039;t Participate in &#039;Big Lie&#039; About Arizona Shooting</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/dwest/2011/01/14/reject-dont-participate-in-big-lie-about-arizona-shooting/#IDComment121299672</link>
<description>If we don&amp;#039;t call them out, nobody will.  You cannot &amp;quot;protest too much&amp;quot; when someone is blaming you for a massacre. Sorry </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/dwest/2011/01/14/reject-dont-participate-in-big-lie-about-arizona-shooting/#IDComment121299672</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : Can Sarah Palin Win the 2012 Republican Nomination?</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/01/can-sarah-palin-win-the-2012-republican-nomination/#IDComment119104736</link>
<description>Why is she a mediocre candidate? Do you know anything about her record? She IS the best candidate. She is a true conservative with a list of accomplishments and standings that match no other possible candidate. She created an enviornment friendly for job growth, economic prosperity, and reduced government spending. She took on the corrupt leadership, on both sides of the aisle. No other candidate can say as much. Stop listening to these naysayers! They all have a motive to nay-say. Do not let the left pick our candidate... A candidate that will no doubt sell out our values. Palin never will. She&amp;#039;s a rock, not a &amp;quot;cheerleader.&amp;quot;   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 2 Jan 2011 01:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/01/01/can-sarah-palin-win-the-2012-republican-nomination/#IDComment119104736</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Gene Simmons: I Want My Obama Vote Back</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/12/04/gene-simmons-i-want-my-obama-vote-back/#IDComment113744071</link>
<description>The band &amp;quot;Muse&amp;quot; is only &amp;#039;new&amp;#039; openly libertarian band I can think of. Their concerts are huge events too. Great stagecraft. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/12/04/gene-simmons-i-want-my-obama-vote-back/#IDComment113744071</guid>
</item><item>
<title>PoliticalWind.net - Political news worth reading : Jon Stewart beats Glenn Beck in battle of the rallies</title>
<link>http://www.politicalwind.net/comments/9364481#IDComment106982657</link>
<description>Bullshit... But you lefties live off lies so keep telling them to yourselves. See if those of us who live in reality care. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 05:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.politicalwind.net/comments/9364481#IDComment106982657</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : The Anti-Women Left Falls Back On Sexual Slurs And Dehumanization</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/10/08/the-anti-women-left-falls-back-on-sexual-slurs-and-dehumanization/#IDComment103249199</link>
<description>Abortion is the reason you people on the left don&amp;#039;t even bat an eye when your fellow leftists use sexist slander and libel against conservative women. What else explains the acceptance of misogyny on the left? I saw Jamu Greene crying on tv the other day when Senator Reid had said something sexist about Senator Gillibrand... Yet, the same is said (actually much worse) about Governor Palin daily and people like Greene say nothing.. No tears.. Just scorn. Why? It boils down to abortion whether you admit it or not... Perhaps some big government philosophy sprinkled on top. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 02:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/10/08/the-anti-women-left-falls-back-on-sexual-slurs-and-dehumanization/#IDComment103249199</guid>
</item><item>
<title>NewsReal Blog : The Anti-Women Left Falls Back On Sexual Slurs And Dehumanization</title>
<link>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/10/08/the-anti-women-left-falls-back-on-sexual-slurs-and-dehumanization/#IDComment103222745</link>
<description>She was talking the misogyny of the left in general, which is out of control, using the latest from Brown as another example. Obviously you couldn&amp;#039;t follow along... or perhaps you&amp;#039;re in denial.  One of the two. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Oct 2010 21:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/10/08/the-anti-women-left-falls-back-on-sexual-slurs-and-dehumanization/#IDComment103222745</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Sarah Palin, &lt;i&gt;Vanity Fair&lt;/i&gt; and a Look Into Michael Joseph Gross&#039;s Christian Background</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jsexton/2010/09/04/sarah-palin-vanity-fair-and-a-look-into-michael-joseph-grosss-background/#IDComment96989756</link>
<description>Yeah, his motivations are written all over eight pages of garbage. The cartoon is sort of a dead giveaway too. Thanks for exposing some of his background.. No logical person believes a word of that article. I hope Vanity Fair will assume relic status soon. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Sep 2010 20:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jsexton/2010/09/04/sarah-palin-vanity-fair-and-a-look-into-michael-joseph-grosss-background/#IDComment96989756</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Will Palin run in 2012?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment89000373</link>
<description>You say &amp;quot;my angry little tea bagger&amp;quot;...  Then you say.. &amp;quot;You are frothing at the mouth and calling people names&amp;quot;  I agree that there is no debate because people like you have hard time explaining why you are such weak humans that you need the government (paid for by those of productive members of society) to take care of you pathetic creatures.  Go ahead and get the last word in this useless flame-war.. I&amp;#039;ve got to go work so I can pay my taxes to take care of your sorry ass. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment89000373</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Will Palin run in 2012?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88977808</link>
<description>I know who Andrew Breitbart is dumbass. Unlike you DailyKos tools, I don&amp;#039;t take talking points from bloggers.  Once you start arguing typos, you&amp;#039;ve lost the debate.  COWARD! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88977808</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Will Palin run in 2012?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88821298</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Brietbart talking points&amp;quot; Okay, that means nothing. I actually know what happened up there, but HEY, you can say Breitbart... Must be some sort of smear in lefty land. You obviously can&amp;#039;t make a point that means anything... And yes, you&amp;#039;re still a coward spewing nonsense on a Canadian publication. Cheers! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88821298</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Will Palin run in 2012?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88765384</link>
<description>No because Obama&amp;#039;s goons wouldn&amp;#039;t be suing both her and the state into poverty, like what was happening in Alaska. Learn your facts before you type. But then again, you&amp;#039;re a coward that types anonymously under &amp;quot;Guest.&amp;quot;.. Cowards don&amp;#039;t don&amp;#039;t need to facts to repeat talking points handed down by the DNC. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88765384</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Will Palin run in 2012?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88709576</link>
<description>Another reason to support Sarah Palin... Don&amp;#039;t let the door hit you.  BTW, you may want to see why the people where protesting in Iceland before heading over there.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88709576</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Will Palin run in 2012?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88611742</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re an ass... You also make no point. Must be the fact that Obama&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;Wranglers&amp;quot; are a bunch of corrupt, socialist idiots. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88611742</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Macleans.ca : Will Palin run in 2012?</title>
<link>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88530968</link>
<description>Sarah Palin doesn&amp;#039;t have handlers.  Research is your friend. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www2.macleans.ca/2010/07/24/will-palin-run-in-2012/#IDComment88530968</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Palin tops new 2012 GOP ‘Power Rankings’</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/covering-iowa-politics/2010/07/01/palin-tops-new-2012-gop-%e2%80%98power-rankings%e2%80%99#IDComment84070322</link>
<description>Uh yeah.. Here&amp;#039;s a little information for you to absorb. For an economy to thrive, there must be investment. Without investment, you have no capital. With no capital, you have no money to build, grow, thrive, innovate,... Nothing.  Nobody is investing because Barack Obama scares the hell out of investors. I have personally talked to many people that lost large sums of money in the last two years and subsequently withdrew their all of their funds. Obama&amp;#039;s policies are to create money out of thin air (devaluing the currency in the process) and creating government jobs that do not produce.. No growth. They end up sucking the system dry and if you look at the country&amp;#039;s deficit, you see the effects of this. Actually when China starts demanding funny things from us, then you will truly see the effects, but I digress...  The looming of Obama&amp;#039;s health care policy coupled with the Cap and Tax bill have stifled any recovery that he could have had with his inflated infusion. These policies scare away investors and lower what companies are willing to do to grow. Growth is required to get people to work and to recover the economy.  So YES, we would be much better off with McCain who would have lowered taxes, incentivised growth, had the government stay out of the auto business, and allowed the free market to correct itself after years of LIBERAL policies from the Bush Administration. Meaning SPEND SPEND SPEND.  The left used to have a problem with that, but I guess Obama spending as much as Bush did in eight years, in two, is no big deal. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jul 2010 05:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/covering-iowa-politics/2010/07/01/palin-tops-new-2012-gop-%e2%80%98power-rankings%e2%80%99#IDComment84070322</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Palin tops new 2012 GOP ‘Power Rankings’</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/covering-iowa-politics/2010/07/01/palin-tops-new-2012-gop-%e2%80%98power-rankings%e2%80%99#IDComment84026683</link>
<description>You left-wingers are so ignorant, you are not going to know what hit you in 2012. Must be all the medication you&amp;#039;re on. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/covering-iowa-politics/2010/07/01/palin-tops-new-2012-gop-%e2%80%98power-rankings%e2%80%99#IDComment84026683</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Palin tops new 2012 GOP ‘Power Rankings’</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/covering-iowa-politics/2010/07/01/palin-tops-new-2012-gop-%e2%80%98power-rankings%e2%80%99#IDComment84026386</link>
<description>How&amp;#039;s that ObamaEconomy treating you?  Over 400,000 jobless claims filed last week... Dow has dropped almost 400 points this week SO FAR! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/covering-iowa-politics/2010/07/01/palin-tops-new-2012-gop-%e2%80%98power-rankings%e2%80%99#IDComment84026386</guid>
</item><item>
<title>GazetteOnline.com : Palin tops new 2012 GOP ‘Power Rankings’</title>
<link>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/covering-iowa-politics/2010/07/01/palin-tops-new-2012-gop-%e2%80%98power-rankings%e2%80%99#IDComment84025371</link>
<description>I doubt you have ever heard a word Palin has ever said. Perhaps you are too shallow and cannot see beyond her good looks. Either that, or you don&amp;#039;t like free-markets, a strong military, and liberty. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://gazetteonline.com/blogs/covering-iowa-politics/2010/07/01/palin-tops-new-2012-gop-%e2%80%98power-rankings%e2%80%99#IDComment84025371</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>