<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/994254</link>
		<description>Comments by matthewsdent</description>
<item>
<title>Conservative Home : It&#039;s Sir David Amess - as Cameron continues his revival of political honours</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2014/12/its-sir-david-amess-as-cameron-continues-his-revival-of-political-honours.html#IDComment935894097</link>
<description>Knighted for services to comedy (and not defecting to UKIP) presumably?   &lt;a href=&quot;http://matthewsdent.wordpress.com/2014/12/31/southend-west-mp-david-amess-to-be-knighted-for-services-to-comedy/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://matthewsdent.wordpress.com/2014/12/31/sout...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 12:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2014/12/its-sir-david-amess-as-cameron-continues-his-revival-of-political-honours.html#IDComment935894097</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Bloggers4UKIP : Rotherham Labour councillor was checking cricket results during no confidence vote in Police and Cri</title>
<link>http://www.bloggers4ukip.org.uk/2014/09/rotherham-labour-councillor-was.html#IDComment877162787</link>
<description>What sort of disrespectful, negligent elected representative would do something like that in the middle of an important meeting?   &lt;a href=&quot;http://matthewsdent.wordpress.com/2014/07/21/kipperwatch-ukip-cllr-plans-board-game-in-southend-council-meeting/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://matthewsdent.wordpress.com/2014/07/21/kipp...&lt;/a&gt;  Oh... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 08:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.bloggers4ukip.org.uk/2014/09/rotherham-labour-councillor-was.html#IDComment877162787</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Who should be the next Conservative candidate for Mayor of London?</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/localgovernment/2014/08/who-should-be-the-conservative-candidate-for-the-next-mayor-of-london.html#IDComment862184013</link>
<description>&amp;quot;...as David Cameron manages to combine being our Prime Minister with serving as the Member of Parliament for Witney.&amp;quot;  He&amp;#039;s pretty awful at both, to be fair. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Aug 2014 08:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/localgovernment/2014/08/who-should-be-the-conservative-candidate-for-the-next-mayor-of-london.html#IDComment862184013</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Robert Halfon is George Osborne&#039;s new PPS</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2014/07/robert-halfon-is-george-osbornes-new-pps.html#IDComment855222979</link>
<description>So now that he is on in government, does that mean Halfon&amp;#039;s silence has been bought?  How disappointing. One of the few Tory MPs I found genuinely interesting. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/parliament/2014/07/robert-halfon-is-george-osbornes-new-pps.html#IDComment855222979</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Cllr Sean Anstee: Our Trafford result proves that Conservatives can win in the north</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/localgovernment/2014/06/cllr-sean-anstee-our-trafford-result-proves-that-conservatives-can-win-in-the-north.html#IDComment838310267</link>
<description>I think it proves you can win in Trafford. Not sure the generalisation really swims to the whole of the north, looking at other results. Though you still lost seats in Trafford, so... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/localgovernment/2014/06/cllr-sean-anstee-our-trafford-result-proves-that-conservatives-can-win-in-the-north.html#IDComment838310267</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Miller was right to resign</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2014/04/miller-was-right-to-resign.html#IDComment815570958</link>
<description>What a scurrilous slur on jacket potatoes, to liken them in any way to Maria Miller. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2014/04/miller-was-right-to-resign.html#IDComment815570958</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Andrew Haldenby: The OBR should have powers to cut and raise tax</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2014/03/from-andrew-haldenby-of-reformthinktank.html#IDComment806529302</link>
<description>I wounder if Mr Haldenby would be so in favour of bureaucrats setting the budget if it were the EU Commission, rather than Osborne&amp;#039;s pet economists? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2014/03/from-andrew-haldenby-of-reformthinktank.html#IDComment806529302</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Luke de Pulford: Why are our leaders cheering on unelected ones abroad?</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2014/03/luke-de-pulford-why-are-our-leaders-cheering-on-unelected-ones-abroad.html#IDComment806526689</link>
<description>&amp;quot;...the fascinating obstinacy of certain commenters on the left in calling Yanukovych&amp;rsquo;s government a regime. Reprehensibly bad it may have been, but a regime it was not.&amp;quot;  Erm...yes, it was:  &amp;quot;Regime (plural regimes)  1) Mode of rule or management. 2) A form of government, or the government in power&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2014/03/luke-de-pulford-why-are-our-leaders-cheering-on-unelected-ones-abroad.html#IDComment806526689</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : What policies would you like to see in the Budget?</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2014/03/what-policies-would-you-like-to-see-in-george-osbornes-budget.html#IDComment804033163</link>
<description>His own, and the government&amp;#039;s, immediate and unconditional resignation. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2014/03/what-policies-would-you-like-to-see-in-george-osbornes-budget.html#IDComment804033163</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Stephen Tall: The immigration choice for the Conservatives - pro-business, or pro-UKIP? </title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/thecolumnists/2014/03/from-stephentall-7.html#IDComment804032900</link>
<description>Because it&amp;#039;s funny watching you froth and rant in blind fury?  Well, it is to me anyway. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/thecolumnists/2014/03/from-stephentall-7.html#IDComment804032900</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Ed Miliband&#039;s &quot;reforms&quot; to the union link hand McCluskey and friends more power</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/leftwatch/2014/03/ed-milibands-reforms-to-the-union-link-hand-mccluskey-and-friends-more-power.html#IDComment799911899</link>
<description>There is a problem across the board with party funding. Labour is too reliant on money from trade unions, yes, but are the Conservatives exempt? How much of Tory donations comes from big business and the super-rich? It is what fuels the accusations that the Conservatives are the party of the rich, and necessitates the sort of debate that Robert Halfon has been trying to promote.  As a Labour supporter myself, I would argue that at least the trades union represent working people, whereas the bankers, etc, are representing only their wallets.  Really, I don&amp;#039;t know what the solution is, but I think that some cap on donations is the only way that we will take big money players out of politics. Not that I&amp;#039;m expecting the turkeys to be voting for Christmas any time soon. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 Mar 2014 18:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/leftwatch/2014/03/ed-milibands-reforms-to-the-union-link-hand-mccluskey-and-friends-more-power.html#IDComment799911899</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Iain Dale: It&#039;s my year for snogging Jacqui Smith</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/thecolumnists/2013/12/from-iaindale-its-my-year-for-snogging-smithjj62.html#IDComment766981961</link>
<description>The living in the past comment was with regard to your opposition to equality, not your fondness for referenda. The latter is simply idealistic and impractical.  The AV referendum cost in the region of &amp;pound;75m. There are over 150 bills passed by parliament each session on average. You do the maths.  How do we play for this? How does the country get anything done, with constant referenda?  I&amp;#039;m not against them for constitutional arrangements, but for everyday legislation? That&amp;#039;s what you elect your MP to deal with. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/thecolumnists/2013/12/from-iaindale-its-my-year-for-snogging-smithjj62.html#IDComment766981961</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Iain Dale: It&#039;s my year for snogging Jacqui Smith</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/thecolumnists/2013/12/from-iaindale-its-my-year-for-snogging-smithjj62.html#IDComment766972380</link>
<description>Yawn.  Might I suggest that, given your rather outspoken opinions here, there are better places for you to reside than 21st century Britain? The nineteenth century perhaps? Or Switzerland?  A referendum on every single law passed by parliament is impractical and expensive. And there is no reason why equal marriage rather than -- say -- the NHS reforms should be put to a referendum. It is neither constitutional nor as diversive as you seem to think. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/thecolumnists/2013/12/from-iaindale-its-my-year-for-snogging-smithjj62.html#IDComment766972380</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Council by-election results from yesterday</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/localgovernment/2013/10/council-by-election-results-from-yesterday-8.html#IDComment740021733</link>
<description>No swing percentages this week? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 13:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/localgovernment/2013/10/council-by-election-results-from-yesterday-8.html#IDComment740021733</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Conservative Home : Adam Afriyie MP: I won&#039;t be bullied out of moving my EU referendum amendment</title>
<link>http://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2013/10/by-adamafriyie-i-wont-be-bullied-out-of-moving-my-eu-referendum-amendment.html#IDComment738049139</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s obvious to Afirye too. He&amp;#039;s just faced with the choice of backing down and slinking away, or going out in what he imagines to be a blaze of glory, which will keep his leadership ambitions intact.  He&amp;#039;s an egotist, plain and simple. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.conservativehome.com/platform/2013/10/by-adamafriyie-i-wont-be-bullied-out-of-moving-my-eu-referendum-amendment.html#IDComment738049139</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Left Watch : Exam board insists A-level Politics students give left-wing answers</title>
<link>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/leftwatch/2013/08/exam-boards-insist-a-level-politics-students-give-left-wing-answers.html#IDComment692493461</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve seen absolutely no evidence to support the assertions made by Ms Binney. But why let that get in the way of a little confirmation bias, eh? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Aug 2013 13:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/leftwatch/2013/08/exam-boards-insist-a-level-politics-students-give-left-wing-answers.html#IDComment692493461</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Platform [OLD] : Lord Ashcroft: As Peter Cruddas wins a resounding High Court victory against The Sunday Times, the P</title>
<link>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/platform/2013/07/lord-ashcroft-as-peter-cruddas-wins-a-resounding-high-court-victory-against-the-sunday-times-the-par.html#IDComment691149179</link>
<description>Despite the fact that she hadn&amp;#039;t done what Cameron (and the Daily Mail) said she had done (namely, attacked the Duchess; rather she attacked the treatment of the Duchess by certain elements of the media)?  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/platform/2013/07/lord-ashcroft-as-peter-cruddas-wins-a-resounding-high-court-victory-against-the-sunday-times-the-par.html#IDComment691149179</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Platform [OLD] : Lord Ashcroft: As Peter Cruddas wins a resounding High Court victory against The Sunday Times, the P</title>
<link>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/platform/2013/07/lord-ashcroft-as-peter-cruddas-wins-a-resounding-high-court-victory-against-the-sunday-times-the-par.html#IDComment691071945</link>
<description>Cameron seems to have a habit of mouthing off on populist news-of-the-day issues without checking his facts. His ill-judged attack on Hilary Mantel when the Mail mis-characterised her comments about the Duchess of Cambridge spring to mind. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/platform/2013/07/lord-ashcroft-as-peter-cruddas-wins-a-resounding-high-court-victory-against-the-sunday-times-the-par.html#IDComment691071945</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Local Government : Lib Dems attacks 20 mph speed limit</title>
<link>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/localgovernment/2013/07/lib-dems-attacks-20-mph-speed-limit.html#IDComment690984242</link>
<description>&amp;quot;However, I eschew such point scoring.&amp;quot;  Really? That&amp;#039;s not like you, Harry... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/localgovernment/2013/07/lib-dems-attacks-20-mph-speed-limit.html#IDComment690984242</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Local Government : Bristol Council spent &pound;21,000 trying to cover up social work failings</title>
<link>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/localgovernment/2013/02/bristol-council-spent-21000-trying-to-cover-up-social-work-failings.html#IDComment571674626</link>
<description>Again, no mention of the controlling political parties here. How very strange.  I&amp;#039;m sure it can have nothing to do with the fact that Bristol is currently run by a coalition of...everybody but Labour. Nor could it be influenced by the fact that this incident straddles portfolios held by a Lib Dem and a...Tory councillor.  But then, I&amp;#039;m sure if it was a Labour council, Harry wouldn&amp;#039;t be mentioning the political situation then either. Right? Right...? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://conservativehome.blogs.com/localgovernment/2013/02/bristol-council-spent-21000-trying-to-cover-up-social-work-failings.html#IDComment571674626</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>