<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1368911</link>
		<description>Comments by knightone</description>
<item>
<title>Defense Tech : Pics of the Day: Look Who&#039;s Headed to Sea Again</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/20/pics-of-the-day-look-whos-headed-to-sea-again/#IDComment344099994</link>
<description>Slightly depressing how many view this only from a force projection POV when this new carrier capability delivers excellent training for the Chinese air force and navy in how to practice anti-carrier operations. Now they got a real ship out at sea with weapon systems to train against. Ideal for a Taiwan scenario. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2012/04/20/pics-of-the-day-look-whos-headed-to-sea-again/#IDComment344099994</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Report: SASC supports F-35, &#039;but not at any cost&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/24/report-senate-supports-f-35-but-not-at-any-cost/#IDComment166327083</link>
<description>The Pentagon has made the fighter program &amp;quot;the cornerstone of its tactical aviation modernization strategy,&amp;quot; said the panel&amp;#039;s report accompanying the bill. &amp;quot;  Thought they said it was going to be a backbone. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/24/report-senate-supports-f-35-but-not-at-any-cost/#IDComment166327083</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Report: SASC supports F-35, &#039;but not at any cost&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/24/report-senate-supports-f-35-but-not-at-any-cost/#IDComment166326241</link>
<description>Surely Lockheed could negotiate lower prices with its sub-contractors since they have confidence 5000-7000 F-35&amp;#039;s will be sold over the next couple of decades. In fact why aren&amp;#039;t LM ordering 1000 pieces of everything right now.. why not don&amp;#039;t they believe in their own product? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 00:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/24/report-senate-supports-f-35-but-not-at-any-cost/#IDComment166326241</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : PAS11: The F-35 software situation</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/21/pas11-the-f-35-software-situation/#IDComment165320671</link>
<description>No. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/21/pas11-the-f-35-software-situation/#IDComment165320671</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : PAS11: The F-35 software situation</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/21/pas11-the-f-35-software-situation/#IDComment165239334</link>
<description>William C, same reason why it cant supercruise even in clean config and 43,000 lbs of thrust.  It&amp;#039;s a brick. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/06/21/pas11-the-f-35-software-situation/#IDComment165239334</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Stateside Basing Kept the F-22 Out of the Libya Fight</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/03/30/stateside-basing-kept-the-f-22-out-of-the-libya-fight/#IDComment138852248</link>
<description>I can&amp;#039;t believe this article and comments completely missed the fact that Canada sent CF-18 fighters and indeed all the way from Canada to participate in bomb attacks on Libyan targets. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2011/03/30/stateside-basing-kept-the-f-22-out-of-the-libya-fight/#IDComment138852248</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : New Footage of Russia&#039;s Second Stealth Fighter</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/27/new-footage-of-russias-second-stealth-fighter/#IDComment137981015</link>
<description>@E_L_P , in the words of a Swedish fighter pilot &amp;#039;you don&amp;#039;t wanna fly up against the new Russian jets with AMRAAMs&amp;#039;... The Eurocanards with Meteor missile, IRST and wide scanning AESA&amp;#039;s will be the hardest opponents the way things look right now. US is rapidly losing its edge. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2011/03/27/new-footage-of-russias-second-stealth-fighter/#IDComment137981015</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : Trade Ya My JSFs for 100 LRStrike: RUMOR</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/10/21/trade-ya-my-jsfs-for-100-lrstrike-rumor/#IDComment105346544</link>
<description>No major cuts will happen before the foreign partners has been convinced to sign for their orders.   After 2015 this thing will be slashed in half. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/10/21/trade-ya-my-jsfs-for-100-lrstrike-rumor/#IDComment105346544</guid>
</item><item>
<title>DoD Buzz : No JSFs Flying To Farnborough</title>
<link>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/07/07/no-jsf-flies-to-farnborough/#IDComment86825488</link>
<description>JF-17 and Saab Gripen NG Demo arrived today. The &amp;quot;f-35&amp;quot; you saw was probably the JF-17. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.dodbuzz.com/2010/07/07/no-jsf-flies-to-farnborough/#IDComment86825488</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>