<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/910351</link>
		<description>Comments by Justin Roff-Marsh</description>
<item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : Mixergy: Christmas tip (almost a Christmas present)</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/12/23/mixergy-christmas-tip-almost-a-christmas-present/#IDComment245684478</link>
<description>I know, I was in Aus when it happened ... but I think he&amp;#039;s recovering now. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 20:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/12/23/mixergy-christmas-tip-almost-a-christmas-present/#IDComment245684478</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 8: Converting opportunities into sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment237103212</link>
<description>Quite true. However, I see these more as communication tools. �They work well enough if some state changes are implied by the activity descriptions. �They are not like (say) &amp;#39;circuit diagrams&amp;#39; in this respect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Even in this simplified form, they still frequently span multiple pages. Most of our clients have them on plotter paper -- sometimes covering entire walls! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 22:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment237103212</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 8: Converting opportunities into sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226905772</link>
<description>I surely will! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226905772</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 8: Converting opportunities into sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226743544</link>
<description>Oh, and thank you for noticing the simplicity. �It takes a lot of work to produce workflows that are this simple. �But you don&amp;#39;t really understand your environment until you do! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226743544</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 8: Converting opportunities into sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226742750</link>
<description>Definitely worth doing: but outside the scope of this book. �I&amp;#39;m already getting curry for making this too cerebral! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226742750</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 8: Converting opportunities into sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226741996</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t understand what you&amp;#039;re suggestion here. �Are you suggesting that the customer views the vendor as the vending machine? �That metaphor isn&amp;#039;t really relevant to account-acquisition.  Justin </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226741996</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 8: Converting opportunities into sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226741224</link>
<description>Another good suggestion, thank you. �I&amp;#39;ll find a way to indicate who&amp;#39;s on the other end of each transaction. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226741224</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 8: Converting opportunities into sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226739998</link>
<description>Raul&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I actually considered that. �I was afraid I might be over-using them ... but you&amp;#39;re right ... it makes the concepts less abstract.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;ll add one on the next go-around.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justin </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226739998</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 8: Converting opportunities into sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226738854</link>
<description>Giri&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You&amp;#39;re right. I should probably pull the argument forward. In fact, when the first draft is done, there&amp;#39;ll be a few sections I need to rearrange. �That&amp;#39;s why these comments are so valuable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason I&amp;#39;m so down on the &amp;#39;qualification&amp;#39; word is that 90% of the time it&amp;#39;s done EXACTLY the same way: contact the prospect and determine if (a) they have the budget, and (b) they are in the process of buying. It&amp;#39;s hard to use the term without telegraphing the impression that it&amp;#39;s an endorsement of that totally dumb behavior.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If proper qualification is prioritization, I&amp;#39;d rather call it that. �&amp;#39;Qualification&amp;#39; implies a categorical approach: you&amp;#39;re in; you&amp;#39;re out. The prioritization of prospects (quick and dirty) is exactly what we want.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for your continuing input. �I owe you a book when this is done.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justin </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226738854</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 8: Converting opportunities into sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226356233</link>
<description>I do! Thank you, Raul.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;ll respond to your posts shortly.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justin </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment226356233</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 8: Converting opportunities into sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment225766423</link>
<description>Sure Becky&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;m treating the account as an annuity ... meaning it&amp;#39;s won with that first transaction. �If this isn&amp;#39;t the case, then we should use the word &amp;#39;customer&amp;#39; rather than &amp;#39;account&amp;#39; or &amp;#39;client&amp;#39;.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for still reading after all these years! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/11/20/the-machine-part-2-chapter-8-converting-opportunities-into-sales/#IDComment225766423</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 7: Formulating a plan</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/12/the-machine-part-2-chapter-7-formulating-a-plan/#IDComment198384207</link>
<description>We do have an affiliate program.  Let me know if you&amp;#039;d like more information via the &amp;quot;Contact&amp;quot; tab above.  Justin </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 05:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/12/the-machine-part-2-chapter-7-formulating-a-plan/#IDComment198384207</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : Tech company eliminates salespeople: boosts sales</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/22/tech-company-eliminates-salespeople-boosts-sales/#IDComment197854501</link>
<description>Dave&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I use�Applian Skype Recorder�to record the raw audio and video streams and put all together in Vegas Pro. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 05:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/22/tech-company-eliminates-salespeople-boosts-sales/#IDComment197854501</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 7: Formulating a plan</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/12/the-machine-part-2-chapter-7-formulating-a-plan/#IDComment194957346</link>
<description>Hi Raul&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you for the compliment. �Yes, I was&amp;#39;t sure if BCG pioneered the use of the 2x2 for business analysis or if the term Boston Matrix belonged to a specific application of the tool as you suggest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I believe there&amp;#39;s been a book published recently extolling the benefits of the 2x2 matrix which I intend to read. �As with checklists, the simplicity of the tool belies it&amp;#39;s power.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justin </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 22:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/12/the-machine-part-2-chapter-7-formulating-a-plan/#IDComment194957346</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 7: Formulating a plan</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/12/the-machine-part-2-chapter-7-formulating-a-plan/#IDComment193578505</link>
<description>Well, in practice you often find that, because of the commission plan, those salespeople who have settled into customer-service-type modes of operation are not earning that much anyway. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/12/the-machine-part-2-chapter-7-formulating-a-plan/#IDComment193578505</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 7: Formulating a plan</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/12/the-machine-part-2-chapter-7-formulating-a-plan/#IDComment193563946</link>
<description>Santiago&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No, not two constraints, just one!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just mean that if the constraint is somewhere other than sales, then all functions must subordinate to that constrained function.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is never two constraints.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Where resourcing is concerned, you ask what will happen to the four salespeople who aren&amp;#39;t converted into salespeople or project leaders. In some cases, one or two of these might be moved into customer service or inside sales (particularly if they are operating in one of these modes already). In some cases, salespeople will be laid off.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In reality, we preside over lay-off&amp;#39;s�less often than it might appear.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What tends to happen in larger salesforces is that attrition is high -- meaning that management can hit the target numbers by simply neglecting to replace salespeople. �Often times, management has unfilled seats when we build the strategy -- which means that savings are realized without having to actually reduce headcount (which is a nice bonus).  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Justin </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/12/the-machine-part-2-chapter-7-formulating-a-plan/#IDComment193563946</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 2 &gt; Chapter 7: Formulating a plan</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/12/the-machine-part-2-chapter-7-formulating-a-plan/#IDComment193030780</link>
<description>Hi Giri  Thank you for your continuing interest in this project.  I&amp;#039;ve fixed the resourcing table. Sorry about that.  Typically, sales managers are not good project leaders (where the &amp;#039;project&amp;#039; is the transition).  They are too much a part of the process being transformed -- and are often the toughest skeptics.  We have more problems with sales managers than we do with salespeople!  Teaching the sales manager to manage in the new environment -- and to maintain the environment -- has to be treated as part of the transitioning project. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/09/12/the-machine-part-2-chapter-7-formulating-a-plan/#IDComment193030780</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : The Machine &gt; Part 1 &gt; Chapter 4: The machine within the machine</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/01/05/the-machine-pt1-ch4/#IDComment178123675</link>
<description>Thank you Giri! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/01/05/the-machine-pt1-ch4/#IDComment178123675</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : Ballistix backs away from projects: embraces services</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/07/21/ballistix-backs-away-from-projects-embraces-services/#IDComment177654918</link>
<description>Thank you, Frank! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 04:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/07/21/ballistix-backs-away-from-projects-embraces-services/#IDComment177654918</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Sales Process Engineering : In memory of Eli Goldratt</title>
<link>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/06/15/in-memory-of-eli-goldratt/#IDComment163020478</link>
<description>Brian  So nice to see you&amp;#039;re still following along after all these years!  Justin </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.salesprocessengineering.net/2011/06/15/in-memory-of-eli-goldratt/#IDComment163020478</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>