<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/874250</link>
		<description>Comments by jufemaiz</description>
<item>
<title>Knowledge@Australian School of Business : Broadband Monopoly: Regulator Required for High-Speed Step Back in Time - Knowledge@Australian Schoo</title>
<link>http://knowledge.asb.unsw.edu.au/article.cfm?articleid=1433#IDComment170130570</link>
<description>It should be noted that the gas and electrical distribution and transmission networks present a fantastic example of a regulatory framework for natural monopolies. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jul 2011 01:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://knowledge.asb.unsw.edu.au/article.cfm?articleid=1433#IDComment170130570</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://www.calamitiesofnature.com/ : Calamities of Nature - Proof for Evolution</title>
<link>http://www.calamitiesofnature.com/archive/?c=525#IDComment146712826</link>
<description>Actually you&amp;#039;re mixing up the use of &amp;quot;theory&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;hypothesis&amp;quot; as it exists in science.  Creationism is an hypothesis currently unsupported by the scientific evidence. Evolution is a hypothesis that is currently supported by scientific evidence and hence a theory.  The Theory of Evolution does not currently describe the critical &amp;quot;start point&amp;quot; of life - the Catholic Church, for example, generally accepts the Theory of Evolution but points to God as the initiator of the original &amp;quot;spark&amp;quot; of life.  To those espousing creationism because a book people wrote many years ago states God did X, how can you rule out what God can and cannot use when it comes to achieving His (or Her depending on faith - and plural for polytheistic faiths) desired outcomes? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 03:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.calamitiesofnature.com/archive/?c=525#IDComment146712826</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : The State Of Web Development Ripped Apart In 25 Tweets By One Man</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/#IDComment76071751</link>
<description>Provided the IP is open sourced once it is part of a standard, I agree.  Unfortunately that won&amp;#039;t be happening anytime soon. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/#IDComment76071751</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : The State Of Web Development Ripped Apart In 25 Tweets By One Man</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/#IDComment76071652</link>
<description>Someone&amp;#039;s starting to make sense ;) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/#IDComment76071652</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : The State Of Web Development Ripped Apart In 25 Tweets By One Man</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/#IDComment76071516</link>
<description>The W3C is just a sum of its members parts.  Perhaps one might want to look at the lagging of members in any one area?  Any developer worth their salt should be pushing their company for representation on either committees or providing feedback on drafts. I wouldn&amp;#039;t want to make a guess at the number who have&amp;hellip; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/#IDComment76071516</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : The State Of Web Development Ripped Apart In 25 Tweets By One Man</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/#IDComment76071329</link>
<description>Actually, he&amp;#039;s put a lot into the web dev community. Firebug anyone? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/#IDComment76071329</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : The State Of Web Development Ripped Apart In 25 Tweets By One Man</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/#IDComment76071232</link>
<description>Define: more powerful. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/30/joe-hewitt-web-development/#IDComment76071232</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Scribd CTO: &quot;We Are Scrapping Flash And Betting The Company On HTML5&quot; (Exclusive Screenshots)</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/05/scribd-html5/#IDComment73145405</link>
<description>Welcome to the world of *progressive enhancement* as a design philosophy.  Enhance the UX with each additional layer of support for new technologies.  It *shouldn&amp;#039;t* be any different with Flash, but very few sites use flash as the enhancement layer and not the complete app layer.  Remember, the web is not a movie. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2010 06:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/05/scribd-html5/#IDComment73145405</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Adobe CTO Kevin Lynch: We&#039;re Going To Make The Best Tools In The World For HTML5</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/05/adobe-cto-kevin-lynch-were-going-to-make-the-best-tools-in-the-world-for-html5/#IDComment73076309</link>
<description>Agreed.  We saw how well Java went for &amp;quot;write once, run anywhere&amp;quot; approaches. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2010 03:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/05/adobe-cto-kevin-lynch-were-going-to-make-the-best-tools-in-the-world-for-html5/#IDComment73076309</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Adobe CTO Kevin Lynch: We&#039;re Going To Make The Best Tools In The World For HTML5</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/05/adobe-cto-kevin-lynch-were-going-to-make-the-best-tools-in-the-world-for-html5/#IDComment73076132</link>
<description>So you can have an equal-or-better experience during development, test, build and deploy without once touching a technology from Adobe (source code or otherwise) in the world of Flash? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2010 03:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/05/adobe-cto-kevin-lynch-were-going-to-make-the-best-tools-in-the-world-for-html5/#IDComment73076132</guid>
</item><item>
<title>IT Expert Voice : Why You Can&#039;t Pry IE6 Out Of Their Cold Dead Hands</title>
<link>http://itexpertvoice.com/home/why-you-cant-pry-ie6-out-of-their-cold-dead-hands/#IDComment61066134</link>
<description>&amp;hellip;and we see why the gulf between the corporate world and the www continues to grow when it comes to web apps.  Is this why there&amp;#039;s a bigger shift to cloud applications in that sphere I wonder? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://itexpertvoice.com/home/why-you-cant-pry-ie6-out-of-their-cold-dead-hands/#IDComment61066134</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>