<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2009667</link>
		<description>Comments by ezrajdulis</description>
<item>
<title>Landmark Report : 9/11: The Hijackers Were Soldiers, The Speech Police Are Terrorists</title>
<link>http://landmarkreport.com/edulis/2011/09/911-the-hijackers-were-soldiers-the-speech-police-are-terrorists/#IDComment192356499</link>
<description>I just turned 24, and thanks! I do what I can. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://landmarkreport.com/edulis/2011/09/911-the-hijackers-were-soldiers-the-speech-police-are-terrorists/#IDComment192356499</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Morning Call Sheet Exclusive: Keith David Joins Wachowski&#039;s &#039;Cloud Atlas&#039; -- Also: Superman&#039;s New Du</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/09/01/morning-call-sheet-exclusive-keith-david-joins-wachowskis-cloud-atlas-also-supermans-new-duds-worry-fanboys-and-when-george-lucas-was-still-george-lucas/#IDComment188764587</link>
<description>Fun fact: Keith David is in John&amp;#039;s movie &amp;quot;Beautiful Loser.&amp;quot; Pretty badass.  And-- may I amend-- John&amp;#039;s movie, which still needs a DVD release. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/09/01/morning-call-sheet-exclusive-keith-david-joins-wachowskis-cloud-atlas-also-supermans-new-duds-worry-fanboys-and-when-george-lucas-was-still-george-lucas/#IDComment188764587</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Weinergate: Twitter User Dan Wolfe Denies Hacking Accusations; Welcomes FBI Investigation</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/edulis/2011/05/31/weinergate-twitter-user-dan-wolfe-denies-hacking-accusations-welcomes-fbi-investigation/#IDComment157921432</link>
<description>&amp;quot;As stated above, pay attention to @RepWeiner and the phony account @repweiner.&amp;quot;    Heh... hee hee... AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!    Please tell me you&amp;#039;re kidding. PLEASE. You actually think that Twitter mentions have to be case sensitive?  Tell me what you see when you go to &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/RepWeiner&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/RepWeiner&lt;/a&gt; versus &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/repweiner&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://twitter.com/repweiner&lt;/a&gt;. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 19:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/edulis/2011/05/31/weinergate-twitter-user-dan-wolfe-denies-hacking-accusations-welcomes-fbi-investigation/#IDComment157921432</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Weinergate: Twitter User Dan Wolfe Denies Hacking Accusations; Welcomes FBI Investigation</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/edulis/2011/05/31/weinergate-twitter-user-dan-wolfe-denies-hacking-accusations-welcomes-fbi-investigation/#IDComment157891561</link>
<description>Um... where does the Verum Serum link say anything about Dan Wolfe &amp;quot;using&amp;quot; such an account? He communicated with the joke account @RepNeedleDick, which he told me is operated as a joke by one of the people he communicates with regularly on Twitter.  Jim Hoft used a screenshot from a fake account... how does that relate to Dan Wolfe... at all?  Yeah, she &lt;i&gt;saw&lt;/i&gt; the pic from Wolfe&amp;#039;s twitter message, but that&amp;#039;s because Weiner had already deleted the tweet from his own account (in case you&amp;#039;re as dense as you seem, the archive of his tweet to @GennetteNicole is still listed at TweetCongress, and Wolfe&amp;#039;s RT references the same Yfrog URL as in the original tweet). Do you also believe that the mailman is the one who writes letters to you?  The &amp;quot;copy of the picture&amp;quot; bit is proof positive you are technologically illiterate. The copy of the photo sent around on Twitter was an automatic resizing of the photo done by Twitter&amp;#039;s API. Few people saw the photo on the original Yfrog link. Wolfe did, and that&amp;#039;s where he saw/downloaded the medium-sized version of the pic. It&amp;#039;s still a resized/compressed version of the original, but it&amp;#039;s larger than the one that was seen by people who got in on the story later than him. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/edulis/2011/05/31/weinergate-twitter-user-dan-wolfe-denies-hacking-accusations-welcomes-fbi-investigation/#IDComment157891561</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Weinergate: Twitter User Dan Wolfe Denies Hacking Accusations; Welcomes FBI Investigation</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/edulis/2011/05/31/weinergate-twitter-user-dan-wolfe-denies-hacking-accusations-welcomes-fbi-investigation/#IDComment157883319</link>
<description>Okay, so do you have any proof he created or operates the @AnthonysWeiner JOKE account?  And, do you believe that he hacked into the @RepWeiner account and sent the crotch photo on the 27th? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 17:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/edulis/2011/05/31/weinergate-twitter-user-dan-wolfe-denies-hacking-accusations-welcomes-fbi-investigation/#IDComment157883319</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Weinergate: Twitter User Dan Wolfe Denies Hacking Accusations; Welcomes FBI Investigation</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/edulis/2011/05/31/weinergate-twitter-user-dan-wolfe-denies-hacking-accusations-welcomes-fbi-investigation/#IDComment157878646</link>
<description>His May 5th (11th was just rehashing) tweets suggested there were multiple pre-existing photos with the Congressman AND a mistress. So, why would he take a slam dunk like that and send one anonymous crotch photo? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 16:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/edulis/2011/05/31/weinergate-twitter-user-dan-wolfe-denies-hacking-accusations-welcomes-fbi-investigation/#IDComment157878646</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Is &#039;South Park&#039; Losing Its Edge?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/29/is-south-park-losing-its-edge/#IDComment157398614</link>
<description>You just put it much better than me. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 01:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/29/is-south-park-losing-its-edge/#IDComment157398614</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Is &#039;South Park&#039; Losing Its Edge?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/29/is-south-park-losing-its-edge/#IDComment157334418</link>
<description>That was when they were giving their demands to the police at FedEx. I was talking about right before he lit the chair on fire at the anger management meeting. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 19:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/29/is-south-park-losing-its-edge/#IDComment157334418</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Is &#039;South Park&#039; Losing Its Edge?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/29/is-south-park-losing-its-edge/#IDComment157334106</link>
<description>Article was written (and originally published) before that episode aired. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 19:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/29/is-south-park-losing-its-edge/#IDComment157334106</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : &lt;strong&gt;Rep. Weiner Spokesperson Lies To &#039;New York Post&#039;&lt;/stron</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2011/05/28/rep-weiner-spokesperson-lies-to-new-york-post/#IDComment157207060</link>
<description>And the uncurious New York Post (as well as Politico and Mediaite) didn&amp;#039;t reach out to representatives from Facebook or Twitter to corroborate Weiner&amp;#039;s story, which they (Facebook and Twitter) could easily do. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 05:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2011/05/28/rep-weiner-spokesperson-lies-to-new-york-post/#IDComment157207060</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Born This Way&#039; Review: Lady Gaga Has Major Daddy Issues with Jesus</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156815447</link>
<description>Two competing stories, according to Wikipedia. One is that her producer texted the song title &amp;quot;Radio Gaga&amp;quot; by Queen to her, because singing that was an inside joke to them. The auto-correct on his phone changed &amp;quot;Radio&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Lady.&amp;quot;  The other school of thought is that it was made up by a marketing team. You decide. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 21:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156815447</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Born This Way&#039; Review: Lady Gaga Has Major Daddy Issues with Jesus</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156144417</link>
<description>Livestock or posterior? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 23:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156144417</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Born This Way&#039; Review: Lady Gaga Has Major Daddy Issues with Jesus</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156115662</link>
<description>I want to frame that last paragraph. Brilliant, sir. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 21:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156115662</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Born This Way&#039; Review: Lady Gaga Has Major Daddy Issues with Jesus</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156102890</link>
<description>I found it more self-deprecating and goofy than pretentious. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 20:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156102890</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Born This Way&#039; Review: Lady Gaga Has Major Daddy Issues with Jesus</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156048288</link>
<description>FTA: &amp;quot;If sexual identity is predetermined and totally unaffected by your personal decisions, what other personal attributes aren&amp;rsquo;t predetermined, and how can we tell?&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 17:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156048288</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Born This Way&#039; Review: Lady Gaga Has Major Daddy Issues with Jesus</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156045071</link>
<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Independence_and_Security_Act_of_2007&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Independence_...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 17:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156045071</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Born This Way&#039; Review: Lady Gaga Has Major Daddy Issues with Jesus</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156027307</link>
<description>Glad to see you&amp;#039;ve learned how to click the &amp;quot;reply&amp;quot; button. And the bill was passed in 2007, thank you very much. Pelosi was Speaker.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156027307</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Born This Way&#039; Review: Lady Gaga Has Major Daddy Issues with Jesus</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156017903</link>
<description>Incandescent light bulbs. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156017903</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Born This Way&#039; Review: Lady Gaga Has Major Daddy Issues with Jesus</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156015371</link>
<description>Dude, is &amp;quot;no credentials&amp;quot; supposed to be a putdown? I&amp;#039;ve had that in my bio for months.     &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/bighollywood.breitbart.com\/author\/edulis\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/author/ed...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 15:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156015371</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Born This Way&#039; Review: Lady Gaga Has Major Daddy Issues with Jesus</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156002458</link>
<description>Self-awareness is definitely not our troll&amp;#039;s strong suit. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 14:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2011/05/25/born-this-way-review-lady-gaga-has-major-daddy-issues-with-jesus/#IDComment156002458</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>