<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/4885699</link>
		<description>Comments by dualer</description>
<item>
<title>Birther Report : Fox News\&#039;s Bill O&rsquo;Reilly: Barack Obama Angry At Donald Trump Over Birther Issue</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/06/fox-newss-bill-oreilly-barack-obama.html#IDComment1024071535</link>
<description>The ONEORLANDO fund now has $7 MILLION in it and money will be &amp;quot;distributed directly to survivors&amp;quot;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-latest-money-to-be-given-directly-to-families-of-orlando-victims/ar-AAhdsWF?li=BBnb7Kz&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-latest-money...&lt;/a&gt;  I guess that could be a reason to keep quiet, just like the homeowners around Sandy Hook all sold their homes on Christmas. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/06/fox-newss-bill-oreilly-barack-obama.html#IDComment1024071535</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Fox News\&#039;s Bill O&rsquo;Reilly: Barack Obama Angry At Donald Trump Over Birther Issue</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/06/fox-newss-bill-oreilly-barack-obama.html#IDComment1024065766</link>
<description>Ron Legler, co-founder of the Pulse, was also President of the Florida Theatrical Association at one time and is now President of the  France-Merrick Performing Arts Center in Baltimore. He was known in Theater and performing arts circles in Fla. for many years. HMMMM.... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/06/fox-newss-bill-oreilly-barack-obama.html#IDComment1024065766</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Video: Donald Trump Goes Birther On Senator Elizabeth Warren; She Is As Native American As I Am</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/05/video-donald-trump-goes-birther-on.html#IDComment1021902519</link>
<description>&amp;amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;https://books.google.com/books?pg=PA129&amp;amp;dq=congress+globe+1845&amp;amp;ei=VytzTfSfBoGDgAe3vfjjBw&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;sqi=2&amp;amp;id=YWEUAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;hl=en#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=congress%20globe%201845&amp;amp;f=false&amp;quot; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;amp;gt; &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;http:// &lt;a href=&quot;http://;https://books.google.com/books?pg=PA129&amp;amp;dq=co...&amp;amp;lt;/a&amp;amp;gt;&amp;quot;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;;https://books.google.com/books?pg=PA129&amp;amp;dq=co...&amp;amp;lt;/a&amp;amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; target=&amp;quot;_blank&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://;https://books.google.com/books?pg=PA129&amp;amp;dq=co...&lt;/a&gt;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;;https://books.google.com/books?pg=PA129&amp;amp;dq=co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;    Romulus Saunders was Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and comprehensively reviewed the early naturalization Acts pertaining to the power of Congress &amp;quot;to establish a uniform rule of naturalization&amp;quot; in this report before Congress from 1845. Of the NA 1790 he says, &amp;quot; it provided for the children of citizens born in foreign countries.&amp;quot; (i.e. THOSE CHILDREN WERE NATURALIZED, NOT NATURAL BORN CITIZENS). He says that the NA 1795 &amp;quot;provided for the children of aliens residing in the country, and for the children of US Citizens born abroad.&amp;quot; (i.e. THOSE CHILDREN ARE NATURALIZED). Of the NA 1802 he says &amp;quot;it repeals all previous Acts&amp;quot; and that &amp;quot;it provides for the children of aliens, WHETHER BORN WITHIN OR OUT OF THE US, BUT MAKES NO PROVISION FOR THE CHILDREN OF US CITIZENS BORN ABROAD.&amp;quot; (children of aliens born in the US were naturalized at the time of the naturalization of the parents before the childrens&amp;#039; 21 st. birthday---- NA 1802 S. 4)    This PROVES beyond a doubt that the class of natural born Citizens did not and DOES NOT (A2S1C5 has never been amended) include the children of aliens born w/in the US or the children of US Citizens born abroad. CASE CLOSED.    See middle column all the way too the top right column.    DEFINITIVE PROOF THAT THE COURTS AND ALL THE OBOT PROVOCATEURS ARE WRONG. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 21:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/05/video-donald-trump-goes-birther-on.html#IDComment1021902519</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Coordinated: Hillary Clinton Political Ad Uses Obama\&#039;s Forged Birth Certificate To Attack Donald Tr</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/05/coordinated-hillary-clinton-political.html#IDComment1021307010</link>
<description>What did Kinsolving say about the seal? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 17:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/05/coordinated-hillary-clinton-political.html#IDComment1021307010</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Coordinated: Hillary Clinton Political Ad Uses Obama\&#039;s Forged Birth Certificate To Attack Donald Tr</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/05/coordinated-hillary-clinton-political.html#IDComment1021306927</link>
<description>Nonsense. The &amp;quot;verification letters&amp;quot; did not even verify who the father was or when the birth day was. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 17:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/05/coordinated-hillary-clinton-political.html#IDComment1021306927</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Coordinated: Hillary Clinton Political Ad Uses Obama\&#039;s Forged Birth Certificate To Attack Donald Tr</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/05/coordinated-hillary-clinton-political.html#IDComment1021235181</link>
<description>A picture on a website is proof of NOTHING. The political hacks at &amp;quot;Factcheck&amp;quot; (we make up our own facts) were not document experts. NO ONE has touched the supposed &amp;quot;raised seal&amp;quot; that is on the back of the document and supposedly gives Hawaii &amp;quot;full faith and credit&amp;quot; by its own statutes. Even if the &amp;quot;birth certificate&amp;quot; is to be believed. Hussein Obama&amp;#039;s birth to a foreign father voids eligibility as a natural born Citizen, no matter if birth occurred on the Oval Office desk.. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 19:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/05/coordinated-hillary-clinton-political.html#IDComment1021235181</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Must Read: Incontrovertible Proof Vattel Is Law; Natural Born Citizen Is Born On Soil To Citizen Par</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020874178</link>
<description>THE COURTS ARE CRIMINAL. THERE IS NO LAW WHEN THE EXECUTOR OF THE LAW IS AN ILLEGAL ENTITY. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 18:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020874178</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Must Read: Incontrovertible Proof Vattel Is Law; Natural Born Citizen Is Born On Soil To Citizen Par</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020874138</link>
<description>NONSENSE OBOT. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 18:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020874138</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Must Read: Incontrovertible Proof Vattel Is Law; Natural Born Citizen Is Born On Soil To Citizen Par</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020803664</link>
<description>Nonsense OBOT.  Here is Marshall in The Venus explaining how Vattel controls the decision based on the natural law concept of &amp;quot;habitation&amp;quot;, as he applies Vattel&amp;#039;s law of nations.  &amp;quot;As this question is not only decisive of many claims now depending before this Court, but is also of vast importance to our merchants generally, I may be excused for stating at some length the reasons on which my opinion is founded.  The whole system of decisions applicable to this subject rests on the law of nations as its base. It is therefore of some importance to inquire how far the writers on that law consider the subjects of one power residing within the territory of another, as retaining their original character or partaking of the character of the nation in which they reside.  Vattel, who, though not very full to this point, is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says  &amp;quot;The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives or indigenes are those born in the country of parents who are citizens. Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are strangers who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound by their residence to the society, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside there, and they are obliged to defend it because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens&amp;quot;. 12 US 253, @289 (1814)   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 22:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020803664</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Must Read: Incontrovertible Proof Vattel Is Law; Natural Born Citizen Is Born On Soil To Citizen Par</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020796846</link>
<description>Go crawl into your hole Obot. Here is Sosa v. Alvarez- Machain (2004) explaining the different aspects of law of nations, which encompasses Maritime law as an aspect cognizable judicially.  &amp;quot;When the United States declared their independence, they were bound to receive the law of nations, in its modern state of purity and refinement.&amp;icirc; Ware v. Hylton, 3 Dall. 199, 281 (1796) (Wilson, J.). In the years of the early Republic, this law of nations comprised two principal elements, the first covering the general norms governing the behavior of national states with each other: &amp;igrave;the science which teaches the rights subsisting between nations or states, and the obligations correspondent to those rights,&amp;icirc; E. de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Preliminaries &amp;szlig;3 (J. Chitty et al. transl. and ed. 1883) (hereinafter Vattel) (footnote omitted), or &amp;igrave;that code of public instruction which defines the rights and prescribes the duties of nations, in their intercourse with each other,&amp;icirc; 1 James Kent Commentaries *1. This aspect of the law of nations thus 20 SOSA v. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN Opinion of the Court occupied the executive and legislative domains, not the judicial. See 4 W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 68 (1769) (hereinafter Commentaries) (&amp;igrave;[O]ffenses against&amp;icirc; the law of nations are &amp;igrave;principally incident to whole states or nations&amp;icirc;). The law of nations included a second, more pedestrian element, however, that did fall within the judicial sphere, as a body of judge-made law regulating the conduct of individuals situated outside domestic boundaries and consequently carrying an international savor. To Blackstone, the law of nations in this sense was implicated &amp;igrave;in mercantile questions, such as bills of exchange and the like; in all marine causes, relating to freight, average, demurrage, insurances, bottomry . . . ; [and] in all disputes relating to prizes, to shipwrecks, to hostages, and ransom bills.&amp;icirc; Id., at 67. The law merchant emerged from the customary practices of international traders and admiralty required its own transnational regulation. And it was the law of nations in this sense that our precursors spoke about when the Court explained the status of coast fishing vessels in wartime grew from &amp;igrave;ancient usage among civilized nations, beginning centuries ago, and gradually ripening into a rule of international law . . . .&amp;icirc; The Paquete Habana, 175 U. S. 677, 686 (1900). There was, finally, a sphere in which these rules binding individuals for the benefit of other individuals overlapped with the norms of state relationships. Blackstone referred to it when he mentioned three specific offenses against the law of nations addressed by the criminal law of England: violation of safe conducts, infringement of the rights of ambassadors, and piracy. 4 Commentaries 68. An assault against an ambassador, for example, impinged upon the sovereignty of the foreign nation and if not adequately redressed could rise to an issue of war. See Vattel 463, 464. It was this narrow set of violations of the law of nations, admitting of a judicial remedy and at the same time threatening serious consequences in international affairs, that was probably on minds of the men who drafted the ATS with its reference to tort&amp;quot;. Sosa v. Alvarez 542 U. S. ____ (2004) , @ 19, 20, 21 </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 20:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020796846</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Must Read: Incontrovertible Proof Vattel Is Law; Natural Born Citizen Is Born On Soil To Citizen Par</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020794518</link>
<description>Nonsense Obot disinfo artist. &amp;quot;Law of Nations&amp;quot; is a treatise on law of nations, i.e International Common Law. It encompasses Maritime law, but is not limited to, nor is John Jay limiting it to &amp;quot;Maritime Law&amp;quot;. Jay is talking about the need to restrict the interaction with foreign nations to the Executive branch, and not to individual states.  Law of nations is part of the &amp;quot;Laws of the United States&amp;quot;--- see the Nereid, and see also Sosa v. Alvarez- Machain.  Law of Nations describes the perfect rights of nations, not only on the high seas but with regard to safe passage of Ambassadors, and many other areas not restricted to &amp;quot;Maritime Law&amp;quot;.   Now go crawl back into your hole. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 19:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020794518</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Must Read: Incontrovertible Proof Vattel Is Law; Natural Born Citizen Is Born On Soil To Citizen Par</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020784585</link>
<description>It is not only there that Law of Nations is said to be one of the &amp;quot;Laws of the United States&amp;quot;. You can also look to Federalist #3 (by John Jay, the first Chief Justice)  The Federalist 3  The Same Subject Continued (Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force and Influence) Jay for the Independent Journal.:  &amp;quot;It is of high importance to the peace of America that she observe the laws of nations towards all these powers, and to me it appears evident that this will be more perfectly and punctually done by one national government than it could be either by thirteen separate States or by three or four distinct confederacies.&amp;quot;  And,  &amp;quot;So far, therefore, as either designed or accidental violations of treaties and the laws of nations afford JUST causes of war, they are less to be apprehended under one general government than under several lesser ones, and in that respect the former most favors the safety of the people.&amp;quot;  The Criminal Obots and judiciary continue to simply ignore law of nations. It is all they can do. To acknowledge that law of nations is part of the &amp;quot;Laws of the United States&amp;quot; blows up their entire silly argument. Law of Nations HAS TO BE ONE OF THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES--- How could Congress punish violations of it (A1S8C10) if it weren&amp;#039;t?    </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2016 16:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/#IDComment1020784585</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Must See: Trump Goes Birther On Canadian-Born Cruz; Questioner Misrepresents Natural Born Citizen</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/04/must-see-trump-goes-birther-on-canadian.html#IDComment1019669722</link>
<description>That ace is up his sleeve </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 17:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/04/must-see-trump-goes-birther-on-canadian.html#IDComment1019669722</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Must See: Trump Goes Birther On Canadian-Born Cruz; Questioner Misrepresents Natural Born Citizen</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/04/must-see-trump-goes-birther-on-canadian.html#IDComment1019616281</link>
<description>Of course it was a plant, but Trump needs to be better educated about what is a natural born Citizen. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/04/must-see-trump-goes-birther-on-canadian.html#IDComment1019616281</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Full Ruling: New Jersey Judge Advisory Opinion Rules Canadian-Born Cruz Eligible To Be President</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/04/full-ruling-new-jersey-judge-advisory.html#IDComment1019120669</link>
<description>&amp;ldquo;This sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment is declaratory of existing rights and affirmative of existing law as to each of the qualifications therein expressed -- &amp;quot;born in the United States,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;naturalized in the United States,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;subject to the jurisdiction thereof&amp;quot; -- in short, as to everything relating to the acquisition of citizenship by facts occurring within the limits of the United States. But it has not touched the acquisition of citizenship by being born abroad of American parents, and has left that subject to be regulated, as it had always been, by Congress in the exercise of the power conferred by the Constitution to establish an uniform rule of naturalization.&amp;rdquo; Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649, 689 (1898) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 22:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/04/full-ruling-new-jersey-judge-advisory.html#IDComment1019120669</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Alert: State Department Foreign Affairs Manual Scrubs Presidential Eligibility Section</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/03/alert-state-department-foreign-affairs.html#IDComment1016834148</link>
<description>Birther Report totally ignored the Florida case or I would have informed you all of this 2 weeks ago. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/03/alert-state-department-foreign-affairs.html#IDComment1016834148</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Alert: State Department Foreign Affairs Manual Scrubs Presidential Eligibility Section</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/03/alert-state-department-foreign-affairs.html#IDComment1016834068</link>
<description>The excuse for this deletion will probably be Thomas dicta in the Zivotofsky case, which was also about someone naturalized by 8 US 1401(g) . This proves that the so called strict Constitutionalist Clarence Thomas was in on it all along, and that maybe Scalia wasn&amp;#039;t going along, and then.... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/03/alert-state-department-foreign-affairs.html#IDComment1016834068</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Alert: State Department Foreign Affairs Manual Scrubs Presidential Eligibility Section</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/03/alert-state-department-foreign-affairs.html#IDComment1016833650</link>
<description>This 7FAM regulation was scrubbed on 2/24, 9 days before the hearing in Fla. It was a main point in the Complaint that 1135.6-2 said that the State Dept. doubted that Ted Cruz was eligible, and that the State Dept. had said that &amp;quot;no court of law had ever ruled...&amp;quot;, meaning that the determination of eligibility was believed to be JUDICIAL not political, by the State Dept.  The Judge would not allow this fact to be entered as evidence on 3/4 in Ft. Lauderdale.  Also 1135.6-3  (&amp;quot;Not citizens by Naturalization&amp;quot;) was changed, and the wording specifically addresses 8 US 1401 (g) (Ted Cruz&amp;#039; naturalization statute) and NO OTHER ONE (Not a-h). So they specifically were curing Ted Cruz&amp;#039; disability.  This happened 9 days before the hearing after 1135.6-2 was there on the book for 18 years. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/03/alert-state-department-foreign-affairs.html#IDComment1016833650</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Rubio &amp; Cruz Ineligible And Phonies: The Linguistic &amp; Logical Aspects Of The Term Natural Bo</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/02/rubio-cruz-ineligible-and-phonies.html#IDComment1014227102</link>
<description>Ft. Lauderdale District Court    Hearing Friday March 4 re. Defendants Rubio and Cruz&amp;#039; motions to dismiss.   11AM, Rm. 840      Case # CACE15022044     </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/02/rubio-cruz-ineligible-and-phonies.html#IDComment1014227102</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Birther Report : Video: Donald Trump; Not Sure If Marco Rubio Is Eligible To Be President; News Media Go Bonkers</title>
<link>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/02/video-donald-trump-not-sure-if-marco.html#IDComment1013852113</link>
<description>JB Williams is wrong. George Romney was not a natural born Citizen. Goldwater was resident of Arizona when it adopted the Constitution--- he was not a nbC but he was eligible. (SEE Boyd v. Nebraska) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/02/video-donald-trump-not-sure-if-marco.html#IDComment1013852113</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>