One should not try to overdo the propaganda.

I am reading Frontpagemag's interesting articles for years, but in this case I would not be surprised if this is a hoax.

We all know that since the Guardian article "Public Figures Named in Paedophile Ring" from 1997 everyone in the media knows the names of the culprits, so why instead of playing circus here too not publish them?

Immigration and the welfare state run with fiat money. Write about fiat money.

It does not matter if the Protocols of Zion are fictitious or from the French Ezraim Lodge as stated by messianic Jew Jerry Golden who I am sure is called a self hating Jew by liberal neocons but I find it very funny that what is written in Protocol 20 about money circulation and the debt machine, oops, state machine is happening as if it is an idea of the Cloward-Piven strategy.

Wow. American authorities are unable to track down paid bills for a studio where a movie was filmed? Where is Jack Bauer?

Can't the geniuses use Stuxnet?

Maybe the government should have listened to George Washington:

The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.

Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.

Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people, under an efficient government, the period is not far off when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality we may at any time resolve upon to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giving us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by justice, shall counsel.

Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?

It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world, so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it, for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But in my opinion it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them.

Maybe Bernanke read "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion":

Money exists to be circulated and any kind of stagnation of money acts ruinously on the running of the State machinery, for which it is the lubricant; a stagnation of the lubricant may stop the regular working of the mechanism.

My question is this: How can academics, politicians, news media people and ordinary citizens continually make and get away with statements such as “Reagan’s budget deficits,” “Clinton’s budget surplus,” “Bush’s tax cuts” and “Obama’s spending binge”?

I read the late Alan Stang and I know the answer: They are all part of the Communist Broadcast System.