<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1022882</link>
		<description>Comments by deleted2835729</description>
<item>
<title>TechCrunch : Reddit Asks Users For Money To Hire People Because &quot;Revenue Isn&#039;t Great&quot;</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/10/reddit-gold/#IDComment85947968</link>
<description>They have a choice. They can run adverts like they do: a single box at the side and treat users well, or they can cover the site in adverts (like digg), treat users like shit and make lots of money.  they choose to treat users well.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/10/reddit-gold/#IDComment85947968</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Reddit Asks Users For Money To Hire People Because &quot;Revenue Isn&#039;t Great&quot;</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/10/reddit-gold/#IDComment85944572</link>
<description>&amp;gt; Reddit is hoping that its users and fans will donate the money needed to hire more people and buy more servers, so they don&amp;rsquo;t have to revert to other tactics like intrusive and obnoxious advertising. But rather than call it what it is &amp;ndash; donations &amp;ndash; the company is asking people to subscribe to reddit gold and pay as much as they want for it.  reddit would never revert to such adverts.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/10/reddit-gold/#IDComment85944572</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Twitter&#039;s Lastest Promoted Tweet Directs You To... Facebook</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/08/twitter-ad-facebook/#IDComment85570936</link>
<description>So we can now cite things we&amp;#039;ve said ourselves as evidence?  Evidence to backup my claim: &lt;a href=&quot;http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/08/twitter-ad-facebook/#IDComment85566916&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/08/twitter-ad-faceb...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/08/twitter-ad-facebook/#IDComment85570936</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Twitter&#039;s Lastest Promoted Tweet Directs You To... Facebook</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/08/twitter-ad-facebook/#IDComment85566916</link>
<description>Jesus Christ Siegler. Facebook and Twitter are not at all competitors, whatever gave you that idea? Has anyone ever said &amp;quot;I am going to use Facebook, not Twitter&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I am going to Twitter, not Facebook!&amp;quot;? No.  Does Arrington have a gun to your head and a demand of 100 articles, regardless of quality?  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/08/twitter-ad-facebook/#IDComment85566916</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Twitter + Vuvuzela. What More Do You Need?</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/07/twitter-vuvuzela/#IDComment85372016</link>
<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vuvuzela-time.co.uk/twitter.com/the_vuvuzela&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.vuvuzela-time.co.uk/twitter.com/the_vu...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jul 2010 20:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/07/twitter-vuvuzela/#IDComment85372016</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : You&#039;re Dead, Unless You Tweet Otherwise</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/07/youre-dead-unless-you-tweet-otherwise/#IDComment85286187</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s September 2010, techcrunch article is posted. &amp;quot;New service for proving you&amp;#039;re alive by @robinwauters&amp;quot; is seen via Twitter, the article announces &amp;quot;Deadr&amp;quot; a new service that hooks up to your internal organs and when you&amp;#039;re dead it tweets about it has received $10,000,000 series A funding!  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jul 2010 10:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/07/youre-dead-unless-you-tweet-otherwise/#IDComment85286187</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Employees Challenged To Crack Facebook Security, Succeed (Updated)</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/05/employees-challenged-to-crack-facebook-security-succeed/#IDComment85102417</link>
<description>use a VPN or only use https (ssl)  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Jul 2010 08:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/05/employees-challenged-to-crack-facebook-security-succeed/#IDComment85102417</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Secular News Daily : British Medical Association labels gay conversion therapy harmful, discredited</title>
<link>http://www.secularnewsdaily.com/2010/07/04/british-medical-association-labels-gay-conversion-therapy-harmful-discredited/#IDComment84887152</link>
<description>Liar! You&amp;#039;re clearly in a different world to &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; straight people! Silly delusional &amp;quot;gays&amp;quot;!!  Also to clarify, this is sarcasm.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.secularnewsdaily.com/2010/07/04/british-medical-association-labels-gay-conversion-therapy-harmful-discredited/#IDComment84887152</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : NuCaptcha&#039;s Technology Uses Video To Decipher Between Humans And Robots</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/30/nucaptchas-technology-uses-video-to-decipher-between-humans-and-robots/#IDComment83466668</link>
<description>Sequel: Please take a photo of the following text &amp;quot;FHMASL&amp;quot; printed in bold Helvetica across your breasts and email it us </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/30/nucaptchas-technology-uses-video-to-decipher-between-humans-and-robots/#IDComment83466668</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Twitter Slashes API Rate Limits In Half Across The Board To Deal With Capacity Issues</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/29/twitter-api-limit/#IDComment83184483</link>
<description>Which is why if you&amp;#039;re going to do it, identify this as a weakness and work out how you&amp;#039;ll handle it when it does happen. It&amp;#039;s nothing new in business.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/29/twitter-api-limit/#IDComment83184483</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Google Chrome Now Comes With Flash Built In</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/#IDComment82224177</link>
<description>&amp;quot;citricsquid&amp;quot; is, online, my &amp;quot;real name&amp;quot;. If you took a few minutes to search for my name you&amp;#039;d find it. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?q=citricsquid&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/search?q=citricsquid&lt;/a&gt;  Third down, twitter: &amp;quot;Samuel Ryan&amp;quot; Now search &amp;quot;Samuel Ryan citricsquid&amp;quot;  Second down, my personal website. Whois for the website, bingo, now you have my full name and address.  So please, if you want to discredit my argument please don&amp;#039;t resort to that shit, I don&amp;#039;t try and hide online. I assume you won&amp;#039;t reply now, nobody does. Enjoy fingering your own ass as you sleep alone tonight.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/#IDComment82224177</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Google Chrome Now Comes With Flash Built In</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/#IDComment82223515</link>
<description>In my comment I addressed the functionality. As I said, that could be done with an hour in Javascript.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/#IDComment82223515</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Google Chrome Now Comes With Flash Built In</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/#IDComment82201780</link>
<description>That site is awful to look at and the functionality is piss poor. That could easily be achieved using (X)HTML, CSS and Javascript. The point of Flash is provide what they can&amp;#039;t, using it to replace what (X)HTML, CSS and Javascript *can* do is ridiculous.  I hope to god you&amp;#039;re not working in any professional setting.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/#IDComment82201780</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Google Chrome Now Comes With Flash Built In</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/#IDComment82119162</link>
<description>...    websites should never be made in Flash and rarely are. Your clients not wanting sites built with Flash has no reflection on whether or not Flash is &amp;quot;dying&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/#IDComment82119162</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Google Chrome Now Comes With Flash Built In</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/#IDComment82117993</link>
<description>BUT WHAT ABOUT HTML5?!!??!?! I SAW A DEMO OF A BALL IN HTML5 HTML5 IS THE FUTURE FLASH IS DEAD I MEAN IPHONE!!!!!   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/#IDComment82117993</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Scribd&#039;s Decision To Dump Flash Pays Off, User Engagement Triples</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/19/scribds-decision-to-dump-flash-pays-off-user-engagement-triples/#IDComment80977316</link>
<description>&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;idc-message&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;idc-comment-msg-div-80977316&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a class=&amp;quot;idc-close&amp;quot; title=&amp;quot;Click to Close Message&amp;quot; href=&amp;quot;javascript: IDC.ui.close_message(80977316)&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;Close Message&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Comment posted.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &amp;lt;p class=&amp;quot;idc-nomargin&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;a class=&amp;quot;idc-share-facebook&amp;quot; onclick=&amp;quot;IDC.ui.fb_wrapper(80977316)&amp;quot; href=&amp;quot;javascript: void(null)&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-decoration: none;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;idc-share-inner&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span&amp;gt;Share on Facebook&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;/a&gt; or &amp;lt;a href=&amp;quot;javascript: IDC.ui.close_message(80977316)&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Close Message&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&amp;amp;gt; Over the last few months    &amp;amp;gt; In early May, Scribd announced its plans to ditch Adobe&amp;rsquo;s Flash    That was just over a month ago. The title is very misleading, dumping Flash didn&amp;#039;t cause the larger uptake or that uptake would have been over the last month, not the last 3. 2 of those months were BEFORE they dumped Flash.     It might have been a part of it, but there is a clear contradiction there.  In fact, the visitors haven&amp;#039;t even changed, just the time current visitors remain on the site, that could surely be argued is down to the Facebook integration, why would HTML5 switch change that?  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 17:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/19/scribds-decision-to-dump-flash-pays-off-user-engagement-triples/#IDComment80977316</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Facebook: Calacanis Is Lying</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/11/facebook-calacanis-is-lying/#IDComment79733974</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s probably the case that Adium doesn&amp;#039;t use the Facebook API and instead actually logs in with your account information.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/11/facebook-calacanis-is-lying/#IDComment79733974</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Twitter Starts Teaching You How To Tweet With Videos</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/10/how-to-use-twitter-videos/#IDComment79507344</link>
<description>Sounds like she&amp;#039;s deaf and struggles to speak.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/10/how-to-use-twitter-videos/#IDComment79507344</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Diaspora&#039;s Final Tally: $200,000 From Nearly 6,500 Backers</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/02/diaspora-project/#IDComment78246085</link>
<description>If diaspora succeeds I will mail Techcrunch a photocopy of my butt. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Jun 2010 19:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/02/diaspora-project/#IDComment78246085</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Guy Who Copied Digg Slams Digg For Copying Twitter</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/guy-who-copied-digg-slams-digg-for-copying-twitter/#IDComment77678104</link>
<description>Looking over the wikipedia article for Digg, it would appear that at the launch of reddit they were very much in their infancy, they were *literally* an article dump, they didn&amp;#039;t even have their now well known in page digg buttons or even categories.   Anyway, the point is, even if reddit did see Digg and think &amp;quot;hey that&amp;#039;s a good idea let&amp;#039;s make our own!&amp;quot;: Digg was still in its infancy, it was nowhere near a full product, it was a core idea, an idea that had been used elsewhere before.   Imagine if I see techcrunch and think &amp;quot;hey that&amp;#039;s an awesome idea, a blog about technology!&amp;quot; and so I create my own. Did I &amp;quot;copy&amp;quot; techcrunch? Yeah, I took their core idea, but I then built my own ideas into it and created my own product. reddit and Digg are very very different now, reddit has a huge focus on community and discussion, digg has a focus on getting the &amp;quot;best&amp;quot; links to the front page and comments are an after thought.   I don&amp;#039;t know if reddit copied digg, I very much doubt it as digg had very little traffic at launch, but for arguments sake let&amp;#039;s say they did, even then it was only an idea, copying an idea and cloning are different, the internet works before of the former and it&amp;#039;s only bad when the latter happens.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 23:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/guy-who-copied-digg-slams-digg-for-copying-twitter/#IDComment77678104</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>