<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1023463</link>
		<description>Comments by Chuck Warnock</description>
<item>
<title>Reclaiming the Mission : The Three Potential (ideological) Traps of Emerging Missional Theology: Can Rollins, McLaren and Hir</title>
<link>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/the-three-potential-ideological-traps-of-emerging-missional-theology-can-rollins-mclaren-and-hirsch-avoid-them/#IDComment81410843</link>
<description>David, very interesting and intriguing cautions.  I am interested in your book, and the issues you discuss after reading your description of it.  Any possibility I could get a galley of your book for preview at my blog, Confessions of a Small-Church Pastor?  Or if not on the blog, just for opening a conversation with you and others? I think you&amp;#039;re on to something no one else has addressed.  Most of the talk/discussion/books I&amp;#039;ve read are about &amp;quot;fixing&amp;quot; evangelicalism, which I agree is deeply flawed, if not downright in error.  My background is Southern Baptist, but I like anabaptist approaches especially regarding peace and justice.  Isn&amp;#039;t the church a contrast community (Lofink) and if so, isn&amp;#039;t it inherently &amp;quot;an inhospitable political presence in the world?&amp;quot; Of course, being authentically a contrast and being annoying are two different things, and since about 1975 or so, evangelicalism has become increasingly narrow and annoying.  But, that&amp;#039;s just my opinion.  I&amp;#039;m interested in learning more about what you&amp;#039;re on to.  Thanks, Chuck </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.reclaimingthemission.com/the-three-potential-ideological-traps-of-emerging-missional-theology-can-rollins-mclaren-and-hirsch-avoid-them/#IDComment81410843</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>