<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1757011</link>
		<description>Comments by artgeeky</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Did Top Liberal Arts College Falsify SAT Data to Legitimize Racial Preferences? </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/02/01/did-top-liberal-arts-college-falsify-sat-data-to-legitimize-racial-preferences/#IDComment281464805</link>
<description>This entire argument is built on numbers that happen to line up nicely. If you are convinced by this, you should really take a look at this...    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/correlation-or-causation-12012011-gfx.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/correlation-...&lt;/a&gt;     Circumstantial evidence doesn&amp;#039;t prove anything. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 04:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cjohnson/2012/02/01/did-top-liberal-arts-college-falsify-sat-data-to-legitimize-racial-preferences/#IDComment281464805</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>