<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/876783</link>
		<description>Comments by archon810</description>
<item>
<title>LEHSYS : Windows Live Writer 2012 Released - Nothing is new or fixed.</title>
<link>http://www.lehsys.com/2012/08/windows-live-writer-2012-released-nothing-is-new-or-fixed/#IDComment429624799</link>
<description>FYI, the old post problem is related to your server and the amount of posts WLW pulls at a time. PHP is set to not allow using over a certain amount of memory per process, so it crashes. If you have access to changing PHP variables on the fly, here&amp;#039;s my solution that solves this (YMMV, dependent on your host - if you have root, this solution definitely works): &lt;a href=&quot;http://beerpla.net/2010/11/06/how-to-dynamically-increase-memory-limits-when-interfacing-with-wordpress-using-xml-rpc-windows-live-writer-etc/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://beerpla.net/2010/11/06/how-to-dynamically-...&lt;/a&gt;.  I love WLW to death, even with all its quirks, but I was very disappointed like you that it brought no new features. I did notice one crash bug was fixed (and probably more under the hood) - WLW 2011 used to crash if you try to edit long posts with lots of images, while said posts are downloading said images. Now it just disables input until all downloads are done. My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/AndroidPolice\/~3\/18nOfVgp8MY\/story01.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Motorola RAZR M 4G LTE Pics And Specs Leaked Ahead Of Announcement&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 01:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.lehsys.com/2012/08/windows-live-writer-2012-released-nothing-is-new-or-fixed/#IDComment429624799</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Google Android Blog : Android Market Now Accepting Essays Instead of Haikus</title>
<link>http://androinica.com/2010/12/17/android-market-now-accepting-essays-instead-of-haikus/#IDComment116370570</link>
<description>Did you forget to insert the link to AP? :-/ </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://androinica.com/2010/12/17/android-market-now-accepting-essays-instead-of-haikus/#IDComment116370570</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Phones Review : Amazon Sale Offers AT&amp;T Phones from 1 Cent </title>
<link>http://www.phonesreview.co.uk/2010/11/12/amazon-sale-offers-att-phones-from-1-cent/#IDComment109424888</link>
<description>Charm is not an AT&amp;amp;T device. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.phonesreview.co.uk/2010/11/12/amazon-sale-offers-att-phones-from-1-cent/#IDComment109424888</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Google Android Blog : Sprint turns on 4G in New York and 5 other cities</title>
<link>http://androinica.com/2010/11/01/sprint-turns-on-4g-in-new-york-and-4-other-cities/#IDComment107188024</link>
<description>I count 5 other cities, FWIW. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://androinica.com/2010/11/01/sprint-turns-on-4g-in-new-york-and-4-other-cities/#IDComment107188024</guid>
</item><item>
<title>T Mobile News &amp; Phone Reviews From Cell Phone Signal : UPDATE : Exclusive: First Official Pictures T-Mobile G2</title>
<link>http://www.cellphonesignal.com/exclusive-first-official-pictures-t-mobile-g2/#IDComment96169891</link>
<description>Great work! Now can we get some larger versions? Those are tiny. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cellphonesignal.com/exclusive-first-official-pictures-t-mobile-g2/#IDComment96169891</guid>
</item><item>
<title>AndroidGuys : Rumor: 2GHz HTC &quot;Sabor&quot; to Arrive with Gingerbread Late 2010 [UPDATE]</title>
<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2010/07/01/rumor-2ghz-htc-sabor-arrive-gingerbread-late-2010/#IDComment83896000</link>
<description>Look at every other post they have. They do the same shit over and over again in pathetic attempts to get traffic (unfortunately successful). </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Jul 2010 18:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.androidguys.com/2010/07/01/rumor-2ghz-htc-sabor-arrive-gingerbread-late-2010/#IDComment83896000</guid>
</item><item>
<title>AndroidGuys : Rumor: 2GHz HTC &quot;Sabor&quot; to Arrive with Gingerbread Late 2010 [UPDATE]</title>
<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2010/07/01/rumor-2ghz-htc-sabor-arrive-gingerbread-late-2010/#IDComment83726810</link>
<description>Ozcarguide is the scum of the earth, biggest bullshit &amp;quot;news&amp;quot; site on the web. No credit, no backlinks, no comments, rumors stated as facts - they&amp;#039;re so full of shit, it&amp;#039;s stopped being funny a long time ago.  Ban reporting based on Ozcarguide. It should be a campaign. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.androidguys.com/2010/07/01/rumor-2ghz-htc-sabor-arrive-gingerbread-late-2010/#IDComment83726810</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : The Rebuttal: An EVO 4G Owner Walks Into An Apple Store (NSFW)</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/29/evo-4g-iphone-4-video/#IDComment83308446</link>
<description>What, nobody noticed? &amp;quot;text-to-speed software&amp;quot;  Common snafu, MG. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/29/evo-4g-iphone-4-video/#IDComment83308446</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Google Android Blog : Qik on the HTC EVO: A lesson in poor app launches [OPINION]</title>
<link>http://androinica.com/2010/06/05/qik-on-the-htc-evo-a-lesson-in-poor-app-launches-opinion/#IDComment78717151</link>
<description>Hey Andrew,  I think the only explanation to why they didn&amp;#039;t publish the app during I/O is that it wasn&amp;#039;t ready yet. If it was... then Qik PMs are insane. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 5 Jun 2010 19:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://androinica.com/2010/06/05/qik-on-the-htc-evo-a-lesson-in-poor-app-launches-opinion/#IDComment78717151</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : An iPhone Lover&#039;s Take On The HTC EVO 4G</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/htc-evo-4g/#IDComment77686002</link>
<description>Absolutely correct, and EVO 4G&amp;#039;s camera is much better than, say, the one I had in the Hero (5MP) but still pales in comparison to even an old Canon SD 450 point and shoot. It&amp;#039;s more about the sensor size than the MPs - MPs are more of a marketing gimmick. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 01:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/htc-evo-4g/#IDComment77686002</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : An iPhone Lover&#039;s Take On The HTC EVO 4G</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/htc-evo-4g/#IDComment77685854</link>
<description>How should that even be an argument? It&amp;#039;s free for the month after I/O so that everyone who got it with the 30 days free service as well as early adopters can test the hotspot feature out. It was never promised to be free, at least not in its current incarnation. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 01:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/htc-evo-4g/#IDComment77685854</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : An iPhone Lover&#039;s Take On The HTC EVO 4G</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/htc-evo-4g/#IDComment77685611</link>
<description>I think you&amp;#039;re getting downvoted massively because you don&amp;#039;t address all the points of the comment in your replies. This one is a good example. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 01:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/htc-evo-4g/#IDComment77685611</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : An iPhone Lover&#039;s Take On The HTC EVO 4G</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/htc-evo-4g/#IDComment77685078</link>
<description>Well, I have run the EVO (been running ever since I/O) and it&amp;#039;s been nothing but blazing fast. I have no idea what your issue is exactly (and I do agree with some points) but some are quite close minded. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 00:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/htc-evo-4g/#IDComment77685078</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Guy Who Copied Digg Slams Digg For Copying Twitter</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/guy-who-copied-digg-slams-digg-for-copying-twitter/#IDComment77678075</link>
<description>Exactly the comment one would expect from a Digg user. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 23:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/29/guy-who-copied-digg-slams-digg-for-copying-twitter/#IDComment77678075</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : A Late Night Froyo Treat! Android 2.2 Goes Live On The Nexus One</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/22/android-froyo-nexus-one/#IDComment76654083</link>
<description>There will be no FM radio in Froyo on the Nexus One - I confirmed that at Google I/O. I don&amp;#039;t remember 100% on the 802.11N but I&amp;#039;m 90% sure the Android dev said it wouldn&amp;#039;t be there either - it&amp;#039;s simply not their priority. He referred me to Cyanogen and other community devs to bake support in. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 14:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/22/android-froyo-nexus-one/#IDComment76654083</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Exclusive: Google To Add Tethering, Wifi Hotspot To Android 2.2 Froyo</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/13/exclusive-google-to-add-tethering-wifi-hotspot-to-android-2-2-froyo/#IDComment75342168</link>
<description>May want to add this while it&amp;#039;s hot:&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/05/13/exclusive-more-information-and-pictures-of-android-2-2-froyos-tether-and-built-in-wifi-access-pointmobile-hotspot-capabilities/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.androidpolice.com/2010/05/13/exclusive...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 23:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/13/exclusive-google-to-add-tethering-wifi-hotspot-to-android-2-2-froyo/#IDComment75342168</guid>
</item><item>
<title>AndroidGuys : Benchmarks Put Android 2.2 at Wicked Fast...Like 450% Faster Than 2.1</title>
<link>http://www.androidguys.com/2010/05/12/benchmarks-put-android-22-wicked-fastlike-450-faster-21/#IDComment75019951</link>
<description>Actually rudimentary math stated a 450% *increase*, which is 5.5x 2.1&amp;#039;s speed, not 4.5x :-] </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 07:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.androidguys.com/2010/05/12/benchmarks-put-android-22-wicked-fastlike-450-faster-21/#IDComment75019951</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>