<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1512846</link>
		<description>Comments by aethermist</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Supreme Court to Consider School Tax-Credit Program</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bewing/2010/07/30/supreme-court-to-consider-school-tax-credit-program/#IDComment89975612</link>
<description>I must say that I am sincerely disappointed in my fellow citizens, who seem to feel that shouting derogatory statements about the people with whom they share this planet into a cavernous echo chamber is somehow &amp;quot;advancing a dialogue.&amp;quot;  We live in a pluralistic society. That doesn&amp;#039;t mean that you have to give up your convictions and adopt a morally relativistic attitude. But it does require that you at least attempt to engage with those you might disagree with in a civil manner.  You want solutions? First you have to accept that not everyone will share your views, and be open to the possibility that others&amp;#039; views might - just might - be legitimate, too. Then you can navigate your differences in a fully informed manner.  You can always disagree - and you should if you have strong evidence to support your case. But name-calling and blanket generalizations do nothing besides undercut your own credibility and expose a deep void of intellectual integrity.  (P.S. There are one or two people here who posted insightful comments. Kudos to you for sticking it out in such a volatile environment.) </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bewing/2010/07/30/supreme-court-to-consider-school-tax-credit-program/#IDComment89975612</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>