If you used iron oxide, the clear glazes I've tried tend to fade it out. Try it with a different oxide or without clear glaze.
The "banned book" analogy that is linked to in this article seems a bit flawed. Unless the Block Bot keeps me from viewing your content when I don't have it installed, there is no comparison. When the busy bodies ban "Harry Potter" from the library, I can't get it from the library, but, that Block Bot doesn't remove anything from the internet.
Is "MRA" a libelous term if you refer to yourself as one? I'll give you "rape apologist". I've never heard someone refer to themselves as a rape apologist. Of course, libelous terms have been thrown around by all sides, on this one.
In a personal sense, sure. In a business sense, I don't think so. If you are labelled as spam, no one takes you or your business and livelihood seriously. That could be a death sentence for any business. I don't really even see a difference in degree. Either could make a claim that they were damaged. Especially, since the MRA claim isn't going to get you imprisoned. I would guess that a financial impact is the most serious for the spammer and the rape apologist.
I wonder what legal recourse those blocked by spam blockers have against those that use them. If they haven't sued and won, what makes people think they have any recourse regarding the Block Bot. I'm sure these companies don't want to be defamed as spammers. Are those opposed to the Block Bot using spam blockers?
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
acgrow 
Company