<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>Anne Milton: out of the blue Comments</title>		<language>en-us</language>		<link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/03/anne-milton-out-of-the-blue/</link>		<description>Comments from Anne Milton: out of the blue</description><item>
<title>Tim_Ireland</title><link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/03/anne-milton-out-of-the-blue/#IDComment133598027</link><description>I fear you underestimate Milton :o) but I will try anyway.  </description><pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:53:57 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/03/anne-milton-out-of-the-blue/#IDComment133598027</guid></item><item>
<title>@mjmilan</title><link>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/03/anne-milton-out-of-the-blue/#IDComment133591796</link><description>Surely. on the topic of donations, the next logical step looks like this.  Dear Ms. Milton,  Electoral Commission rules require the disclosure of donations to the consituency association with a value over &amp;pound;1.500, but do not actually prevent the publication of lesser sums - they merely fail to mandate their disclosure.  With that in mind, I would be grateful if you could please answer my question. In the event that you are unable or unwilling, I would be grateful if you could state whether :  a) The alleged donor has requested you do not disclose the information, together with any stated reasoning... b) You yourself have chosen not to disclose the information, together with your reasoning.  Anything less would fall woefully short of my expectations of minister of state in a supposedly transparent parliament.  My thanks in anticpation,      Would that not be a little harder for her to evade?  Martin.   </description><pubDate>Wed, 9 Mar 2011 13:17:05 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2011/03/anne-milton-out-of-the-blue/#IDComment133591796</guid></item>	</channel></rss>