gdp's Comments

Breitbart.tv : Watch The Movie Everyone Is Talking About: 'When Mitt Romney Came To Town'

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:20:16 +0000

Burrowing your words, you might be the goon when Newt is attacking Mitt's claim as being a 'job creator' and not attacking Capitalism. That was spun off by the media including the supposed conservative media which seems to be successfully influencing many weak minds.

Breitbart.tv : Watch The Movie Everyone Is Talking About: 'When Mitt Romney Came To Town'

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:46:45 +0000

Actually I think none of them want to work with Newt because they will no longer be able to do business as usual and actually have to work and make deals?! Which means no more pleasing the lobbyist and working for the people, yeah that's an awfull thing.

Breitbart.tv : Watch The Movie Everyone Is Talking About: 'When Mitt Romney Came To Town'

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:41:12 +0000

Thank you. You made me feel sane.

Breitbart.tv : Watch The Movie Everyone Is Talking About: 'When Mitt Romney Came To Town'

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:34:26 +0000

I am really puzzled how people are drinking this kool-aid. Don't you think it's wierd how Mitt machine spent so much attacking Newt but no one criticized Mitt claiming it is done by the superpac. But when Newt's superpac goes out, they point to Newt and he's portrayed as the one feeding ammo to Obama. What is this BIAS?

Breitbart.tv : Watch The Movie Everyone Is Talking About: 'When Mitt Romney Came To Town'

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:25:50 +0000

That same Newt was probably the ONLY person who fought hard against Gore and Pelosi's global warming BS. You seem to be already on Mitt's propaganda wagon claiming such blunt lie. I'm still trying hard to find what exactly Newt said that is attacking Capitalism. Newt is just calling out on Mitt claiming he's a job creator while the record shows otherwise. And that is an attack on Capitalism? HOW? Please, and this to all brainwashed Mitt fans, wake up and smell the coffee.

Big Government : Romney Says His Work at Bain Is Like Obama's Auto Industry Bailout

Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:09:45 +0000

Gingrich should be the clear choice, but so far it seems that everyone wants the same in WH just a different label after the name (R). As much as Mitt claims his experience in the private sector, he's shown all he did was to spread the wealth as he'll do just that to his piling supporters endorsing him and expecting for that huge payout once he's in office.

Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Who's Smarter? Liberals or Conservatives?

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:34:24 +0000

Here's a food for thought. As a generalization let me lay down the common impression of conservatives: religious and strict to law. There's evidence that some with religious faith disagrees the teaching of 'evolution' or anything that is against their belief. That restricts one's mind. Knowing something and believing something is completely different thing. But somehow, and some 'conservatives' knowing these other information themselves wants it kept away from their children. That isn't 'intellectual' thinking, it's emotional. And on the law end of the story. Conservatives want less government involvement, less regulation while many want censorship. I won't go and explain this one, think about it, it ain't smart either. When knowing everything you can is considered being intellectual, conservatives tend to restrict too much. That's why people like Gutfeld is refreshing for conservatives. Open up conservatives, it's okay to know and choose the 'right' way. Conservatives=Self responsible

Big Government : Thread: Ron Paul Wins CPAC Straw Poll

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:31:25 +0000

Polls are for those that can't make up their own mind.

Big Government : Thread: Glenn Beck Delivers Keynote Address to 2010 CPAC

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:27:32 +0000

So he's selling a good story, something some agree and praise for voicing their mind, and what's his evil plot behind this that he's going to benefit? Money? It's no secret that he's in an entertainment business. Nothing I can think wrong about CPAC hiring someone that can display what motivates the people at the meeting. I just don't see the con aspect.

Big Hollywood : How The Book of Eli Got Into the Wrong Hands

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:00:15 +0000

I agree, major spoiler for those who didn't see it.

Big Journalism : Snow Buries Washington, MSNBC Cries 'Global Warming'

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:09:03 +0000

El Nino explains the current weather situation better than anything else. Nothing to do with disproving or proving AGW. Just another natural event that human have no control of.

Breitbart.com : Schools close as South braces for rare snow storm

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:06:40 +0000

I wonder why they don't explain why we have this type of weather. El Nino clearly shows and supports the current weather. Vancouver is warmer, West coast is wetter, and South east to East coast is cooler. All natural and nothing to do with human influence or global warming. Climate change due to El Nino, simple as that.

Big Government : Tuesday Open Thread: Climate Change Edition

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:22:56 +0000

I'm not sure if you'll have access to it but here's a paper explaining how ice core are unreliable other than for seasonal reference. http://www.phys.uu.nl/~helsen/PDF/Helsen06JGR.pdf

Big Journalism : Willful Blindness: MSM Ignores Republican Half of the Story on Healthcare Reform Efforts

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:11:14 +0000

I sometimes feel that we (fortunate people having access to cable and network) fail to recognize the number of people still relying on paper and over-the-air information. As long as they keep the information on those outlet to be in sync, people will believe what they preach. I think that is why they tried to restrict radio programs.

Big Government : Tuesday Open Thread: Climate Change Edition

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:34:43 +0000

Can you refer me to the graph that shows the correlation between them using r-squared at least equalling 5%. Then I'll get back to you after that. By the way, that's the ongoing arguement and from what I know, it's still a guessing game.

Big Government : Tuesday Open Thread: Climate Change Edition

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:54:30 +0000

That explains why you are being stubborn. Before I explain what I meant, let me tell you why it is important to know what you called irrelevant. If the record shows CO2 level being much higher in the past before human existence, it clearly means it will do so without the help of human. And when everytime the level reaches around 400ppm the record shows the fall in temperature. That is very relevant and cannot be dismissed for it is the law of nature. Now back to what I meant. Human can abide by the law of nature but cannot create the law of nature. That is what I meant.

Big Government : Tuesday Open Thread: Climate Change Edition

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:18:57 +0000

And let me remind you, human can only rely on natural forces and never produce such force.

Big Government : Tuesday Open Thread: Climate Change Edition

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:02:05 +0000

Well, temperature during the medieval warm period as you mentioned certainly was much higher than the temperature today. And as you mentioned, entered little ice age right after. Again as you mentioned, we may enter yet another little ice age, don't you think nature adjusts itself?

Big Government : A New Tea Party Resource - The Ensuring Liberty PAC

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:38:25 +0000

I am excited how people are involved in politics. The more people discuss, the better this nation becomes. And as it was proven in MA, people can make a huge impact.

Big Government : Tuesday Open Thread: Climate Change Edition

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:25:15 +0000

Pappadave, he does understand the mechanics behind global temperature in general. What he fails to understand is that CO2's affect on raising the temperature can be easily negated by other natural forces and therefore cannot be the driver for overall rise in global temperature. But since that won't support his hypothesis, he uses statements like 'warmest decade in recorded history' while not informing you that 'recorded history' by sattelite data. Also atmospheric CO2 levels are higher than at anytime in human history but were much higher during the span of earth history. Furthermore, human are responsible for the increase by burning fossil fuels while many other contribute in the rise as the history of earth tells us. It is unfortunate when smart person like him can be influenced to believe in AGW.