zomborgland
79p484 comments posted · 3 followers · following 0
3 years ago @ Mile Square View - Election Theft Evidenc... · 0 replies · +1 points
One question though. Wisconsin allows new voters to to register up to and including on election day. Obviously, that would render old voter registration information obsolete. I'm sure your sources have explained that and you are referring to final voter registration figures as of the close of the polls on Nov. 3rd right? Because I know you would never mislead people with dated inaccurate voter registration figures, would you?
5 years ago @ Mile Square View - BREAKING: HOBOKEN OLD ... · 2 replies · +1 points
LOL! I don't know why people think Horsey has no sense of humor or appreciation of irony.
6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Tales from the Crypt: ... · 0 replies · +1 points
6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Shiny Penny Mike DeFus... · 1 reply · +1 points
6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Shiny Penny Mike DeFus... · 4 replies · +1 points
If Roman's goal was to make up a story that would get a rise out of Stupidgate, then he succeeded. But the fact is he lied. If you actually think Roman has Ravi's poll numbers then you are as stupid as Stupidgate.
6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Shiny Penny Mike DeFus... · 2 replies · +1 points
Just like you made up Ravi's supposed poll l numbers that you continually refer back to. By all means "share" some more. Maybe Stupidgate will believe you actually know something.
6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Shiny Penny Mike DeFus... · 4 replies · +1 points
Stupidgate really has no standing to complain since Roman seems to have studied at the Stupidgate School of Misinformation, making this interaction truly entertaining.
Carry on kids!
6 years ago @ Mile Square View - How the Monarch decisi... · 1 reply · +1 points
6 years ago @ Mile Square View - How the Monarch decisi... · 3 replies · +1 points
Not that it would change anything because it wouldn't.
6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Grist for the Mill Ele... · 1 reply · +1 points
Your "reporting" has been that a campaign that you claimed was always winning has "surged" according to your mystery poll into 2nd place. Instead of explaining that odd anomaly, as well as your sudden reversal on the value of polling, you have just repeated that you somehow "got it right." I guess that's the best explanation you have so I won't ask again.
You have not answered my question about whether it was OK for Jen to reach out to fellow Republicans as a Republican and to ask for and get their partisan support in a non-partisan race, something that she has been aggressively doing. I assume that was an oversight not an inability to anser the question without appearing to be a bit of a hypocrite.