zomborgland

zomborgland

79p

484 comments posted · 3 followers · following 0

3 years ago @ Mile Square View - Election Theft Evidenc... · 0 replies · +1 points

Thank you Horsey for the inside scoop on what's really going on as gleaned from your vast and highly informed investigative sources. As usual, objective journalism par excellence!

One question though. Wisconsin allows new voters to to register up to and including on election day. Obviously, that would render old voter registration information obsolete. I'm sure your sources have explained that and you are referring to final voter registration figures as of the close of the polls on Nov. 3rd right? Because I know you would never mislead people with dated inaccurate voter registration figures, would you?

5 years ago @ Mile Square View - BREAKING: HOBOKEN OLD ... · 2 replies · +1 points

Horsey says "people should cite substantial evidence not lob wild accusations"

LOL! I don't know why people think Horsey has no sense of humor or appreciation of irony.

6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Tales from the Crypt: ... · 0 replies · +1 points

Sad!

6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Shiny Penny Mike DeFus... · 1 reply · +1 points

Roman, You don't "report." You blog. Your a blogger not a journalist.

6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Shiny Penny Mike DeFus... · 4 replies · +1 points

Many things are plausible Kurt. Roman "reported" it as a fact when the fact is that he simply made it up. Indeed, given Campos's situation it is almost certainly untrue.

If Roman's goal was to make up a story that would get a rise out of Stupidgate, then he succeeded. But the fact is he lied. If you actually think Roman has Ravi's poll numbers then you are as stupid as Stupidgate.

6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Shiny Penny Mike DeFus... · 2 replies · +1 points

Campos was certainly part of that crew back in 2007, and the rogues gallery supporting DeFusco are certainly his old friends. That's not what you said. You said Campos was actively supporting DeFusco in this election. Not only would that be pretty unimportant even if true, its pretty clear that (like much of what you post), you have no idea if that's true or not - you simply made it up.

Just like you made up Ravi's supposed poll l numbers that you continually refer back to. By all means "share" some more. Maybe Stupidgate will believe you actually know something.

6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Shiny Penny Mike DeFus... · 4 replies · +1 points

Few Hoboken voters remember Chris Campos so falsely including him in the list of the rogues gallery of DeFusco supporters (he has prison on his mind not Mike DeFusco) adds nothing to the mix. There really is no reason for Roman to lie about Campos's involvement. Yet he is. Because Roman continually simply makes stupid stuff up then is genuinely angry when people point that out and don't take him seriously. As he's said "I'm the Hoboken Horse god damn it!" As usual he defends the lie to the end even after its exposed as a lie.

Stupidgate really has no standing to complain since Roman seems to have studied at the Stupidgate School of Misinformation, making this interaction truly entertaining.

Carry on kids!

6 years ago @ Mile Square View - How the Monarch decisi... · 1 reply · +1 points

MSV readers are entitled to exactly what they receive here - which is the stuff you make up. You published fake poll results and seem to be actually admitting that. Anybody who actually believes what you write deserves what they get.

6 years ago @ Mile Square View - How the Monarch decisi... · 3 replies · +1 points

Roman, why would anybody else bother denying or confirming stuff you just make up? You might as well ask people to deny you're a horse and claim if no one bothers, well that proves you're actually a horse.

Not that it would change anything because it wouldn't.

6 years ago @ Mile Square View - Grist for the Mill Ele... · 1 reply · +1 points

Good afternoon Roman. Feel free to believe I've "shared" with you some kind of confidential Bhalla polling info if you'd like. But all I've shared with you is an interpretation of your own "fake" data. Ravi's poll results have no relationship to whatever it is you think your "reporting" on or on anything I'm ever likely to share with you.

Your "reporting" has been that a campaign that you claimed was always winning has "surged" according to your mystery poll into 2nd place. Instead of explaining that odd anomaly, as well as your sudden reversal on the value of polling, you have just repeated that you somehow "got it right." I guess that's the best explanation you have so I won't ask again.

You have not answered my question about whether it was OK for Jen to reach out to fellow Republicans as a Republican and to ask for and get their partisan support in a non-partisan race, something that she has been aggressively doing. I assume that was an oversight not an inability to anser the question without appearing to be a bit of a hypocrite.