<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/654898</link>
		<description>Comments by ydnartitcomb</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : A Palin Announcement on September 3rd Looks More Likely</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/nnichols/2011/08/21/a-palin-announcement-on-september-3rd-looks-more-likely/#IDComment185358750</link>
<description>Our President has no love for this country, or for the rules and laws that govern it. He wants to change the entire structure to his liking. Sarah has a love for this country, our system of government, our people, and wants to keep the government out of our lives as much as possible. We (as a people) can quibble about no experience here or there for different candidates, but I think the old status quo of having the good ole boys clubs of both parties running the show has run its course and needs to be replaced. Sarah has the skills that are needed to bring the majority of the people together to fix our problems with government. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 01:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/nnichols/2011/08/21/a-palin-announcement-on-september-3rd-looks-more-likely/#IDComment185358750</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : A Palin Announcement on September 3rd Looks More Likely</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/nnichols/2011/08/21/a-palin-announcement-on-september-3rd-looks-more-likely/#IDComment185345444</link>
<description>Sarah Palin passes the qualifications test of the constitution, she just doesn&amp;#039;t pass your qualification test. Let&amp;#039;s say it like it is. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/nnichols/2011/08/21/a-palin-announcement-on-september-3rd-looks-more-likely/#IDComment185345444</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : The Totally Objective &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt; Weighs In On GOP Response</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/25/the-totally-objective-new-york-times-weighs-in-on-gop-response/#IDComment177322287</link>
<description>This garbage is not going to last more people will eventually see the difference in there so called journalism and the truth </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/25/the-totally-objective-new-york-times-weighs-in-on-gop-response/#IDComment177322287</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : White House Did Not Want GOP Response to Presidential Speech</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/25/white-house-did-not-want-gop-response-to-presidential-speech/#IDComment177320501</link>
<description>Thank you Dana for being there for Americans and reporting on this issue </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 01:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/07/25/white-house-did-not-want-gop-response-to-presidential-speech/#IDComment177320501</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Anniversary Post: &#039;Big Government&#039; Rises Again</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2009/09/10/big-government-rises-again/#IDComment33902069</link>
<description>Congrats on the new site I will look forward to the news from here </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2009/09/10/big-government-rises-again/#IDComment33902069</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>