xcivxciv

xcivxciv

61p

224 comments posted · 3 followers · following 0

4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - The end of the Conserv... · 0 replies · +1 points

What is not robust, is leaving with no deal.

~19% support.
https://www.survation.com/general-election-voting...

4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - David Gauke: Why I bel... · 0 replies · +1 points

I'm afraid it's at 19% now, that includes leave voters.
https://www.survation.com/general-election-voting...

4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - David Gauke: Why I bel... · 3 replies · +1 points

There are a lot of very brave no dealers here.

With support for that outcome only at ~19% you will be a very popular people when the sh!t hits the fan.

4 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Jacob Rees-Mogg: Why I... · 0 replies · +1 points

It's because they are ultimately persuing the Kaiser Permanente model of health care.

Indeed Google with throw up a document somewhere where it says that the NHS needs to merge in social care, low and behold.

Nice of them to ask people if that's why they want?

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Damian Hinds: Labour i... · 0 replies · +1 points

Academies are run by greedy businessman. Not that you do anything about it.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - James Cartlidge: It's ... · 4 replies · +1 points

There will be no food rationing.

We would run out in about 2 days.

There no capacity to stockpile any.

UK food supply is all JIT.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/ju...

No deal is quite simply, impossible, and would lead to a national government.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - James Cartlidge: It's ... · 0 replies · +1 points

I'm a remainer, but this will not happen under May.

Read the LRB bio and watch the Newsnight profile.

She views Brexit as a task to be undertaken and completed, much like 'reduce immigration to tens of thousands'.

She will of course fail, like she did then, and end up with the kamikazee option of no deal (a la Windrush).

Leading to a national government.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Darren Grimes: Help me... · 1 reply · +1 points

It's really not that complicated if you look through it with impartial eyes.

In this country we have election rules on spending, which need to be upheld, and that is the function of the EC.

If you take that away then people can buy outcomes and that will undermine faith in the election system.

See the United States for examples of where no limits goes wrong.

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Darren Grimes: Help me... · 0 replies · +1 points

Just imagine if Corbyn got elected and then some fines were levied due to expenses issues.

People wouldn't be so quick to run down the EC then...

Oh I can just imagine the wailing and cries of foul play here!

5 years ago @ http://www.conservativ... - Darren Grimes: Help me... · 3 replies · +1 points

This is nonsense logic.

Do you elect the police, the judiciary, etc.