<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/316314</link>
		<description>Comments by xJonx</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Americans split on Obama first year: polls</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b616ae00a24ef8e49d06735e1603c648.3f1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment51894346</link>
<description>Besides, just because Bush was unable to keep the Democrat leadership in Congress from CAUSING the economic crisis, doesn&amp;#039;t mean that Obama should then rely on them. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b616ae00a24ef8e49d06735e1603c648.3f1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment51894346</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Americans split on Obama first year: polls</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b616ae00a24ef8e49d06735e1603c648.3f1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment51893769</link>
<description>So, you&amp;rsquo;re against affirmative action, colleges discriminating against whites in the interest of &amp;#039;diversity&amp;#039;, BET TV, the Congressional Black Caucus, and other associations which prejudice against whites?  OR are you one of those stupid morons who think only whites can be racist?  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.b616ae00a24ef8e49d06735e1603c648.3f1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment51893769</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : BREAKING: San Diego ACORN Document Dump Scandal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/droach/2009/11/23/breaking-san-diego-acorn-document-dump-scandal/#IDComment44487634</link>
<description>AND SO, the only reason to get rid of the documents is if the documents themselves are more damaging than the disappearance of the documents.  Which, of course, make one wonder all the more &amp;hellip; what IS in those documents.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/droach/2009/11/23/breaking-san-diego-acorn-document-dump-scandal/#IDComment44487634</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : UC Berkeley students protest student fee hike</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C3DOT00#IDComment44084037</link>
<description>I think it&amp;rsquo;s hypocritical of Berkeley students, a college renowned for supporting liberalism, to try to avoid the consequences of liberalism. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C3DOT00#IDComment44084037</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Outrage in Washington over Obama\&#039;s Japan bow</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.50fd6792b83ac59fea414195ebeb58b3.2d1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment43457539</link>
<description>First, it wasn&amp;#039;t a gesture of respect, but a gesture of subserviance.  Second, the reason we OWE money to other governments is because of all the Entitlement programs created by Democrats and (admittedly) some Republicans (but no conservatives). We have been trying to solve THAT problem for a while now. But the majority of voters vote based on the promises they PERSONALLY will benefit from without considering the consequences to their children. So ...  Third, it would be wise for everyone to recognize that government is AS CORRUPT (if not more so) than corporations. And so, just like you want MANY corporations competing against each other, so TO, you want many governments. If we ACTUALLY had ONE world government, we would ALL loose our civil liberties. There would be NO incentive for the government to keep them. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.50fd6792b83ac59fea414195ebeb58b3.2d1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment43457539</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : But for heroes, bloodbath could have been worse</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BQBRSO0#IDComment42570253</link>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; It has now created a level of suspicion that will grow throughout the country. Where people, civilian and military, alike will be on guard against muslims around them. How can any of them be trusted?   Which was the POINT of the attack. SO, unless we force ourselves to be more mature then they expect us to be, they win. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BQBRSO0#IDComment42570253</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : But for heroes, bloodbath could have been worse</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BQBRSO0#IDComment42569335</link>
<description>Were are NOT waging a war against muslims. We are waging a war against EXTREMIST TERRORISTS who use the muslim religion as a tool.  I say this with EXTREME prejudice because it is the Liberal Press working AGAINST the US and the extremists themselves that SAY we are waging a war against muslims to recruit more idiots to their side.  In other words, your words are giving Aid and Comfort and JUSTIFICATION to the enemy. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BQBRSO0#IDComment42569335</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : House GOP pens 230-page health bill draft</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1#IDComment41943417</link>
<description>Hence the term &amp;quot;Compassionate&amp;quot; Conservatism.  BTW, an entitelment is something you can piss on without guilt (your entitled to it, no matter what you do with it). A gift is something you should appreciate. SO, if you actually want to LIFT someone up, then you should give them a gift, not an entitlement. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BO6PQO1#IDComment41943417</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Republicans eye Obama revenge in off-year elections</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.dcdb2b50963a1139124490d9126bc2c9.b51&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0#IDComment41514769</link>
<description>BUT, let&amp;rsquo;s examine our differences and see if you and I are at least living by our principles.  Conservatives feel the needy should be helped through private entities (charities). Liberals feel that the only way to really guarantee that the needy will receive the help they need is for the government to provide the service (national health care, welfare, etc.).  I live by my principles &amp;hellip; I give a large portion of my extra money to charities so they CAN help the needy. Do you live by YOUR principles? How much EXTRA money did you send to the IRS this year?  If you HAVE intentionally given EXTRA money to the IRS, then I have no choice but to respect you.  BUT, if your answer is none, if you haven&amp;rsquo;t sent any EXTRA money to the IRS, then your being sanctimonious with MY money, not your own. If you&amp;rsquo;re honest with yourself, then you must SEE what this says about your principles?  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.dcdb2b50963a1139124490d9126bc2c9.b51&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0#IDComment41514769</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Republicans eye Obama revenge in off-year elections</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.dcdb2b50963a1139124490d9126bc2c9.b51&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0#IDComment41514747</link>
<description>If Obama was REALLY trying to build a better America, then I, being a compassionate conservative, would support him. But HIS idea of a better America is rooted in the idea that HE, being an elitist, knows how to spend MY money better than I do. Since this isn&amp;rsquo;t at all true, then everything he builds on top of this cracked foundation of self grandeur is destined to crumble. He actually isn&amp;rsquo;t building ANYTHING. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.dcdb2b50963a1139124490d9126bc2c9.b51&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0#IDComment41514747</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : One year on, Obamamania gives way to luke warm support</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a9c1d8758a5fc4e5ede14d5a3ec887ad.661&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0#IDComment41509958</link>
<description>But he DOES feel like he can spend our money better than we can. Thus, in his mind, he DOES think he is doing right by the people.  I hate to say it, but considering he won the election by what 54%, maybe he&amp;#039;s right. Maybe he CAN spend 54% of American&amp;#039;s money better than they can.  What&amp;#039;s the old adage? &amp;quot;A fool and his money are soon parted&amp;quot;  It just sucks that the rest of us have to suffer along side the fools. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a9c1d8758a5fc4e5ede14d5a3ec887ad.661&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=0#IDComment41509958</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama hits out at climate \&#039;naysayers\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40741929</link>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; overwhelming scientific evidence when it comes to climate change  Well shoot. Please publish this overwhelming scientific evidence which supports global warming. Because as of yet, the only overwhelming evidence that HAS been published has been that which debunks global warming. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.131&amp;show_article=1#IDComment40741929</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama offers millions in Muslim technology fund</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.211&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=3#IDComment40561796</link>
<description>1) They gave the world the number Zero. I know that doesn&amp;#039;t SEEM like a great accomplishment, but it has HUGE ramifications,including the ability to express decimal places. Prior to that, the world was reliant on the Roman numeric system. As a matter of fact, the number Zero was SO significant, 0-9 numbering system replaced the Roman system WHILE Rome was still the world power.  2) When you give someone something worth having, they tend to want to protect it. This is why when an educated couple has a child or starts a white collar career they tend to shift their votes from Democrat to Republican. So, the idea is that if we create an environment through inovation whereby the muslim world aquires things they what to protect, then maybe they will be more ... cordial toward the rest of the world.  3) With 1 and 2 said: Obama (and liberals in general) make the SAME mistake over and over again &amp;hellip; they simply throw money at it without accountability. If the muslim world was worth investing in, then the global market would have already done so.  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.96323f483e0be9f6a793eaa215ad708a.211&amp;show_article=1&amp;catnum=3#IDComment40561796</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Report urges action to preserve journalism</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BEEBMG0#IDComment39578168</link>
<description>You&amp;rsquo;re more correct than you realize ... especially considering that the Endowment for the Arts (an organization who&amp;rsquo;s greatest benefactor is the tax payer) is now part of Obama&amp;#039;s propaganda machine. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BEEBMG0#IDComment39578168</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Report urges action to preserve journalism</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BEEBMG0#IDComment39577439</link>
<description>Obama? Is that YOU? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BEEBMG0#IDComment39577439</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : White beauty queen at US black uni pens plea to Obama</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.48d4a7ee7157a03122c383175e63be4f.161&amp;show_article=1#IDComment38968212</link>
<description>Obama himself prooves you wrong:  &amp;quot;The cops acted stupidly&amp;quot;, said Obama. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.48d4a7ee7157a03122c383175e63be4f.161&amp;show_article=1#IDComment38968212</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : White beauty queen at US black uni pens plea to Obama</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.48d4a7ee7157a03122c383175e63be4f.161&amp;show_article=1#IDComment38968046</link>
<description>THATS an easy question to answer.   When MLK&amp;#039;s message of &amp;quot;judge all men based on their character&amp;quot; first permeated its way into our culture, we were more accepting and were REALLY making positive strides toward racial peace.   BUT, after the Al Sharpton&amp;#039;s and Jessy Jackson&amp;#039;s of our culture realized that they could make money off of pitting blacks against whites in the interest of &amp;quot;diversity&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;statistically equality&amp;quot;, THEIR message of &amp;quot;a black man should first be judged to be entitled&amp;quot;, a polar opposite message from MLK (btw), our culture moved away from cultural acceptance and respect and instead has deteriorated.   PROOF: 90 to 95% of all blacks voted for Obama. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.48d4a7ee7157a03122c383175e63be4f.161&amp;show_article=1#IDComment38968046</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Venezuela seizes a landmark Hilton Hotel</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.641f6a1ace6620056b73f6b56e7b6cd8.b31&amp;show_article=1#IDComment38702054</link>
<description>If you can&amp;#039;t tell the difference between what didn&amp;#039;t happen to America because of the consequences Bush would have implemented vs what IS happening to America because Obama is a push-over, then not only do I blame YOU, but you actually deserve to be blamed. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.641f6a1ace6620056b73f6b56e7b6cd8.b31&amp;show_article=1#IDComment38702054</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B5N46O1</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B5N46O1#IDComment37511310</link>
<description>First and foremost ... beyond ALL other accomplishments ... his defining act ... he&amp;#039;s a child molester.  Although the state of his soul is between God and him, his physical being belongs in jail. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Oct 2009 17:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B5N46O1#IDComment37511310</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : White House: Leaving Afghanistan not an option</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B53AL82#IDComment37336827</link>
<description>Are you saying that the party that looses seats in the House in 2010 is the party of nuts, retards, and loosers? Are you prepared to live with these titles if it turns out that the Democrats loose seats?  Or are YOU venting because YOU are, after all, powerless to stop the tax payers from waking up to the theft the tax receivers have been a propogating for the last 2 years? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B53AL82#IDComment37336827</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>