<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/3252870</link>
		<description>Comments by wolfpackalumn</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Occupier Jay-Z Buys Newborn $20K Crib</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/01/11/occupier-jay-z-buys-newborn-20k-crib/#IDComment261714373</link>
<description>That rocking horse looks like it could actually hurt a child, with it&amp;#039;s sharp edges! :/ </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/01/11/occupier-jay-z-buys-newborn-20k-crib/#IDComment261714373</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Disgusting: NBC News Accuses Romney Of Using KKK Slogan; Matthews Apologizes On Behalf Of Network</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/disgusting-nbc-news-accuses-romney-of-using-kkk-slogan-matthews-apologizes-on-behalf-of-network/#IDComment237683988</link>
<description>This &amp;quot;apology&amp;quot; is only a response to the realization that they&amp;#039;ve presented a case against themselves for libel and slander.  Funny how the &amp;quot;apology&amp;quot; doesn&amp;#039;t even mention that the slogan was not even a slogan for the Romney campaign!! The person who made the video was completely independent from the Romney campaign, as evidenced by the disclaimer at the end that states &amp;quot;Mitt Romney does not support this ad.&amp;quot;   Idiots. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 01:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/disgusting-nbc-news-accuses-romney-of-using-kkk-slogan-matthews-apologizes-on-behalf-of-network/#IDComment237683988</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breastfeeding Woman Accused Of Indecent Exposure </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breastfeeding-woman-accused-of-indecent-exposure/#IDComment237555633</link>
<description>P.S. Oh yeah...and I LOVE the temper tantrums! Keep em coming! :)                  And be sure to include more f-bombs...you&amp;#039;re really proving the point to us readers about manners and class!! And your intellectual prowess is just mind-boggling. I&amp;#039;m sure you have people convinced of your side already! Keep up the good work! :D                  (As a sidenote...not wanting to hear screaming kids has nothing to do with being sanctimonious, but I wouldn&amp;#039;t expect you to grasp the nuances of the English language, since yours seems to be limited to 4-letter words)...Also interesting to note that you are telling me to &amp;quot;F-k off,&amp;quot;....because last I checked, YOU are the one who came to ME! LOL XD                 P.P.S. I apologize for referring to you earlier as a &amp;quot;lady.&amp;quot; I obviously didn&amp;#039;t know who I was speaking with. Seeing as you have the mouth of a sailor (or at least a pubescent teenage boy), from here on out I will refer to you as &amp;quot;dude.&amp;quot;                  Later, dude ;) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breastfeeding-woman-accused-of-indecent-exposure/#IDComment237555633</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breastfeeding Woman Accused Of Indecent Exposure </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breastfeeding-woman-accused-of-indecent-exposure/#IDComment237542705</link>
<description>I will repeat...  Nice language...keep it classy, psycho. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breastfeeding-woman-accused-of-indecent-exposure/#IDComment237542705</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breastfeeding Woman Accused Of Indecent Exposure </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breastfeeding-woman-accused-of-indecent-exposure/#IDComment237542103</link>
<description>Nice language...keep it classy, psycho.    White trash? Wow...you sure are making assumptions here. I hate to break it to you, but far from trash...I&amp;#039;m an upstanding member of my community and I am a doctor (...and I&amp;#039;m sure it probably wouldn&amp;#039;t matter much to you that most of the work I&amp;#039;ve done throughout my career has been on a volunteer or pro bono basis...because what else would you expect from &amp;quot;trash,&amp;quot; right?). Also...I&amp;#039;m not white (but feel free to continue with your racial epithets).   I do it? Wrong. More assumptions (you know what they say about that).  I want to get in line? Wrong again...and you have a sick mind too! Wow, big surprise there. I would never have guessed, based on your mouth.    As far as I&amp;#039;m concerned, people that have a mouth like you are the trash. You expose yourself to the world...and I had to do absolutely nothing! Thank you so much!! :)    Why don&amp;#039;t you teach me again about &amp;quot;manners!!&amp;quot;...What a joke! LOL!!! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breastfeeding-woman-accused-of-indecent-exposure/#IDComment237542103</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breastfeeding Woman Accused Of Indecent Exposure </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breastfeeding-woman-accused-of-indecent-exposure/#IDComment237331448</link>
<description>You mean back in the day when people were as classy as you? (/end sarc)  A bit ironic getting lectures on &amp;quot;class&amp;quot; from a woman who uses the word &amp;quot;tit,&amp;quot; and who gets so easily offended over a total non-issue. But I suppose &amp;quot;class&amp;quot; is in the eye of the beholder, after all.  Get a grip, lady. I hate to break it to you, but a woman feeding her child is *not* a dirty act. And, as I mentioned, I&amp;#039;ve never seen a woman do so in an immodest manner, but having always been covered. It&amp;#039;s nothing a woman should be ashamed of. Please get off your sanctimonious high horse.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breastfeeding-woman-accused-of-indecent-exposure/#IDComment237331448</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Breastfeeding Woman Accused Of Indecent Exposure </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/breastfeeding-woman-accused-of-indecent-exposure/#IDComment237055490</link>
<description>Oh puhleeze...  I&amp;#039;m all for breast feeding in public...because I&amp;#039;m not interested in hearing other people&amp;#039;s screaming kids in public!!  Breast feeding vs. screaming babies. That&amp;#039;s the choice, people! It&amp;#039;s a no-brainer.   And I&amp;#039;ve never once seen a woman breastfeed in any immodest way in public. I&amp;#039;m sure it&amp;#039;s happened, but I&amp;#039;ve never seen it. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/breastfeeding-woman-accused-of-indecent-exposure/#IDComment237055490</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Meghan McCain: Bachmann Is &#039;Thinking Man’s&#039; Palin</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/meghan-mccain-bachmann-is-thinking-mans-palin/#IDComment231828542</link>
<description>Can someone please tell Boobs McGhee to shut the hell up!! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Dec 2011 21:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/meghan-mccain-bachmann-is-thinking-mans-palin/#IDComment231828542</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : World&#039;s First School Of Sex Opens</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/worlds-first-school-of-sex-opens/#IDComment231277633</link>
<description>Umm....soooo....what happens when 90% of all enrollees wind up being men? :/   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/worlds-first-school-of-sex-opens/#IDComment231277633</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Jimmy Fallon Show Plays &#039;Lyin&#039; Ass Bitch&#039; To Intro Michele Bachmann</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/jimmy-fallon-show-band-plays-lyin-ass-bitch-to-intro-michele-bachmann/#IDComment225859081</link>
<description>Hey, Dumbass...    I was talking about his cruddy SHOW...that NOBODY WATCHES because it SUCKS!!!    Not stupid soundbites and clips posted on the internet THE NEXT DAY!    Do you want me to explain that more sloooooowly for you??    Ironic, however, how you just PROVED MY POINT that people are only going to be catching this because they are going to see it on clips posted on the internet the next day....because NOBODY WATCHES HIS FRIGGIN SHOW!!! LOL!!!!!    Moron. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/jimmy-fallon-show-band-plays-lyin-ass-bitch-to-intro-michele-bachmann/#IDComment225859081</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : NBC&#039;s Fallon Band Proud of &#039;Lyin&#039; Ass Bitch&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/11/22/nbcs-fallon-band-proud-of-lyin-ass-bitch/#IDComment225825276</link>
<description>I love watching these idiots further alienate themselves from potential viewers. Classic! They really don&amp;#039;t need any help from the right now do they. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2011/11/22/nbcs-fallon-band-proud-of-lyin-ass-bitch/#IDComment225825276</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Jimmy Fallon Show Plays &#039;Lyin&#039; Ass Bitch&#039; To Intro Michele Bachmann</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/jimmy-fallon-show-band-plays-lyin-ass-bitch-to-intro-michele-bachmann/#IDComment225785578</link>
<description>The good news is...since it&amp;#039;s on the Jimmy Fallon show, nobody will actually see it!!  LOL. Seriously...who the hell watches Jimmy Fallon?! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/jimmy-fallon-show-band-plays-lyin-ass-bitch-to-intro-michele-bachmann/#IDComment225785578</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : #Occupy Protester Has No Idea What Sign She&#039;s Holding </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupy-protester-has-no-idea-what-sign-shes-holding/#IDComment225265320</link>
<description>&amp;quot;But yet within roughly a half an hour I get 9 responses on this post...&amp;quot;  Because you didn&amp;#039;t have enough FORESIGHT to realize that making a post that says &amp;quot;Reasons why the right wing-propaganda machine has failed to destroy OWS&amp;quot; would actually give you ANSWERS...which is why you then had to change your post to say &amp;quot;4 reasons why...&amp;quot;  LOL!!!  Talk about &amp;quot;fail.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupy-protester-has-no-idea-what-sign-shes-holding/#IDComment225265320</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : #Occupy Protester Has No Idea What Sign She&#039;s Holding </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupy-protester-has-no-idea-what-sign-shes-holding/#IDComment224454459</link>
<description>because a sucker is born every minute?  that&amp;#039;s the easy explanation, of course, for why these idiots exist. And never have these words rang more true. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/occupy-protester-has-no-idea-what-sign-shes-holding/#IDComment224454459</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Megyn Kelly&#039;s Court: Is Insider Trading Really Helping Congressmen?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment224083564</link>
<description>Funny...I just looked on your page, and you claim to be a Christian, yet you make an erroneous, trigger-happy judgment about another user, accusing them of lying (when you are WRONG), based on nothing at all.    I was simply coming to the defense of another user who received an abusive response, and I receive baseless accusations in response? As I said, I don&amp;#039;t even know workinglate...for all I know, I could even be defending somebody I wouldn&amp;#039;t even normally defend! I have no idea, because I didn&amp;#039;t even look on their page, and it didn&amp;#039;t even matter to me. All I saw was them getting attacked by another user, so I stopped to say something about it. End of story. But yet...this is somehow suddenly some big conspiracy?    I ALSO happen to be a Christian, so it bothers me to be needlessly slandered by a self-proclaimed fellow brother (or sister, whatever you happen to be). How sad...and disappointing.   I just wanted you to know that, not that it really matters. That&amp;#039;s all I have to say. Take care.  P.S. also...very interesting to note that there are almost identical comments (almost word for word even) on your page and LibertyBelle&amp;#039;s page. I won&amp;#039;t come to any conclusions on that...just making a simple observation. In addition to falsely accusing the brethren and slander...hypocrisy is also a sin, but I don&amp;#039;t need to tell you that.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment224083564</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Megyn Kelly&#039;s Court: Is Insider Trading Really Helping Congressmen?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment224051656</link>
<description>Sorry to disappoint...wolfpackalumn and PatchyBaby are SPOUSES.   NEVER MET &amp;quot;workinglate.&amp;quot;  A *literate* person understands this from reading the thread. It&amp;#039;s beyond me why you think I would even VOLUNTEER this information ...without even needing to!! LOL!!! I never even had to mention it at all, but there&amp;#039;s nothing to hide about this! Yes, wolfpackalumn and PatchyBaby share a household!! You caught me...by my own VOLUNTARILY PROVIDING this information!! LOL!!!  It&amp;#039;s clear to me, however, that LibertyBelle is nothing more than a troll, not just based on this thread...but in comments I&amp;#039;ve seen her leave on OTHER threads as well (and my opinion on this extends to anybody who would also defend her, if they are not indeed her as well).  Ironically (or rather, appropriately), your comment lacks the most substance of all. Go figure.    </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment224051656</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Megyn Kelly&#039;s Court: Is Insider Trading Really Helping Congressmen?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment223987783</link>
<description>What &amp;quot;spirit&amp;quot; are you talking about?? I don&amp;#039;t even know what that means. I gave you a simple explanation (even though I wasn&amp;#039;t OBLIGATED to do so), to satisfy your paranoid ACCUSATIONS.    You really do have a problem.    And if you &amp;quot;missed it,&amp;quot; then you are not paying attention. I gave you the name of the book in my 2nd or 3rd post to you...and guess what...IT&amp;#039;S STILL HERE! Unlike you, I don&amp;#039;t delete my posts and re-edit them beyond recognition (you really shouldn&amp;#039;t make a habit on going-off on nonsensical, yelling, nasty, and rude tangents to others only to regret it later and delete or change your posts). What you call my &amp;quot;re-worked post&amp;quot; was a duplicate post I made VERBATIM, word-for-word. You, on the other hand, delete entire posts you make. And you change your posts entirely to say something completely different    You really need to be done with this and stop embarrassing yourself. Good luck.    P.S. Actually...I take one thing back. I JUST NOW deleted the VERY LAST 2 posts I made to you because I realize that even having a conversation with you is futile. I have no idea what the hell a &amp;quot;Double Ding&amp;quot; is, but what I do know is that speaking with you is like talking to a totally irrational person, as anybody here can see. I already explained to you the issue about my mine and my spouses accounts (actually...I never even come here!), and if you don&amp;#039;t understand the simple English I used, then there&amp;#039;s nothing more I can do. I wasn&amp;#039;t even obligated to give you an explanation, but I chose to. In retrospect, I probably shouldn&amp;#039;t have even bothered talking to you in the first place. You accept no culpability (and I only even came here to defend a complete stranger!!). I feel sad for you, you don&amp;#039;t seem like a happy person to me. Good luck. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment223987783</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Megyn Kelly&#039;s Court: Is Insider Trading Really Helping Congressmen?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment223956593</link>
<description>lady...you have some kind of a problem, and I&amp;#039;m starting to think it&amp;#039;s mental.  I gave you the name of the book yesterday (not that it&amp;#039;s my JOB to spoon-feed you).  Also, for this past week, only about HALF of the videos on Breitbart have been devoted to the topic of Schweitzer (why don&amp;#039;t you just look at the videos homepage...it&amp;#039;s only a click away!), it&amp;#039;s been all over the internet, on Drudge, on blogs and news forums, on radio shows, tv interviews, all over the place ...so, if you are clueless, it is not MY problem. And since you admit that you had no idea what you were talking about, then perhaps THAT&amp;#039;S precisely the reason why you shouldn&amp;#039;t be so rude to others! (in the way you jumped down that guy&amp;#039;s throat, screaming &amp;quot;WHO CARES,&amp;quot; criticizing his aptitude for not being more specific, questioning the point of his post, and all your other nonsense you spewed...before you deleted all that garbage).  It is not MINE or anybody else&amp;#039;s job to inform you...stop being lazy and look it up for yourself!!  Especially before you act like a nasty crazy person to somebody else! If you &amp;quot;haven&amp;#039;t heard of it&amp;quot; then you shouldn&amp;#039;t jump down someone&amp;#039;s throat! It absolutely amazes me how prideful you have been in this conversation in not even admitting that YOU  were the one with the problem. It is not MY job (or anyone else&amp;#039;s) to give you a clue. Perhaps you should inform YOURSELF first before making stupid responses. That&amp;#039;s the point.   Sheesh.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment223956593</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Megyn Kelly&#039;s Court: Is Insider Trading Really Helping Congressmen?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment223570905</link>
<description>P.S. Also, in response to your &amp;quot;huffy&amp;quot; comment...        I find your comment ironic...I was not being &amp;quot;huffy&amp;quot; at all. A little smart-alecky, perhaps (to poke some fun)...but huffy, no. You, on the other hand, were incredibly rude in how you responded to that guy&amp;#039;s post (before your multiple edits, of course), without even knowing what you were talking about...which is the only reason I even responded to you in the first place (as I mentioned in my follow-up comment). In regards to the &amp;quot;huffy,&amp;quot; I think you may be projecting a bit.        Anyways, good day to you :) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment223570905</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Megyn Kelly&#039;s Court: Is Insider Trading Really Helping Congressmen?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment223566192</link>
<description>Also...if there was any confusion about WHO I was...one of the comment&amp;#039;s I posted was under my SPOUSES account (yes, we actually share a computer), and it automatically logs-in under that account. After I logged out and then logged into MY OWN account, I realized that I had posted on that account. So, I deleted the response and then re-posted it (verbatim) under the INITIAL account, so you could know that I was the same person. If you notice...the name on that account was NOT &amp;quot;workinglate.&amp;quot; Anyways, I could have left it as is...but I wanted to keep it consistent for the readers.  So now, you can put your paranoid theory at rest, lol. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/megyn-kellys-court-is-insider-trading-really-helping-congressmen/#IDComment223566192</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>