<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/213553</link>
		<description>Comments by Willem Kossen</description>
<item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Did it happen as I thought?</title>
<link>http%3a%2f%2fwillemkossen.nl%2fb%2f%3fp%3d315#IDComment50818564</link>
<description>Thanks Klaas. And thanks for actually reading to the end of the post. I restored the last line!.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http%3a%2f%2fwillemkossen.nl%2fb%2f%3fp%3d315#IDComment50818564</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : You know you have to update your pc when:</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=224#IDComment47209498</link>
<description>thanks. Recommendations are always welcome!. glad you liked it. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=224#IDComment47209498</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Barcodes on Blogs.</title>
<link>http://wil#IDComment43943656</link>
<description>My pleasure.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wil#IDComment43943656</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : The Readability of the EULA</title>
<link>http%3a%2f%2fwillemkossen.nl%2fb%2f%3fp%3d293#IDComment41497988</link>
<description>Thanks for your comment. I hereby encourage everyone who reads this to start complaining about the eula&amp;#039;s lack of readability! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http%3a%2f%2fwillemkossen.nl%2fb%2f%3fp%3d293#IDComment41497988</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Standardize by exclusion or selection?</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=114#IDComment41497895</link>
<description>Thanks! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=114#IDComment41497895</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : I&#039;m a Google Waver Now</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=286#IDComment38932359</link>
<description>Thanks for your comment. Although I don&amp;#039;t share your level of disappointment, it is definitely true that this new platform isn&amp;#039;t ready for the mainstream yet. For now, it&amp;#039;s mostly a geek-toy. For real productivity a tool should save rather than cost me time... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=286#IDComment38932359</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : I&#039;m a Google Waver Now</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=286#IDComment38931503</link>
<description>Dank. Tot waves... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=286#IDComment38931503</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Web 4.0, Another Definition.</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment15290027</link>
<description>In a sense, I agree. The numbering is trivial. However, 1 through 3 are quite accepted and 4 was just on the doorstep, waiting to enter... The point I wanted to make in the post wasn&amp;#039;t so much about numbers, but about available technology not being used effectively because people won&amp;#039;t use open standards and won&amp;#039;t agree on dataportability. And I guess from your comment that you got the point perfectly. Thanks for commenting, and thanks for your blog as well (I&amp;#039;m a regular visitor as you no doubt have noticed...) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment15290027</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Standardize by exclusion or selection?</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=114#IDComment14853972</link>
<description>Many thoughts... And I&amp;#039;m working on two ICTU programmes, so maybe we should meet and discuss this as this discussion would be bigger that what would normally fit within the commentsection of a weblog... </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=114#IDComment14853972</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Barcodes on Blogs.</title>
<link>http://wil#IDComment14453063</link>
<description>Hey, I didn&amp;#039;t know that one yet.... Never too old to learn. I don&amp;#039;t think however that this is the way to go. Color is always more tricky than black and white. What if the colors fade? And how about printing cost if you want to go bulk? the other thing is this: They&amp;#039;re way behind the already emerging standards in this field. (being Microsoft, that wouldn&amp;#039;t stop them...) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://wil#IDComment14453063</guid>
</item><item>
<title>EVERYTHING 2.0 : All technology predictions for 2009, and beyond</title>
<link>http://bobstumpel.blogspot.com/2008/12/all-technology-predictions-for-2009-and.html#IDComment13659408</link>
<description>Nice list. My own predictions on &lt;a href=&quot;http://willemkossen.nl/b&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://willemkossen.nl/b&lt;/a&gt;are dwarfed by this one.... Thanks </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bobstumpel.blogspot.com/2008/12/all-technology-predictions-for-2009-and.html#IDComment13659408</guid>
</item><item>
<title>EVERYTHING 2.0 : My technology predictions for 2009, and beyond</title>
<link>http://bobstumpel.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-technology-predictions-for-2009-and.html#IDComment13626885</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll be rechecking this post in december to see what actually happened. Good predictions though. I like the way you keep them compact. Good thing to remember and much less work than my first attempt on my blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://willemkossen.nl/b&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://willemkossen.nl/b&lt;/a&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bobstumpel.blogspot.com/2009/01/my-technology-predictions-for-2009-and.html#IDComment13626885</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Web 4.0, Another Definition.</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478433</link>
<description>I would love some of these technologies too. However, there is a problem as I already explained. What happens when the power goes out? What happens if we run out of the raw materials (like Lithium) we need for operation? Our dependance of these materials and technologies is in fact rather dangerous. Do you know how to survive with only a knife and some rope? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478433</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Web 4.0, Another Definition.</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478420</link>
<description>I agree. The technology is available. The problem, again, is integration. Open standards are rare. X10 is one that was promising and open hardware like Arduino boards will help. The wide spread availability of Internet and TCP/IP is now available. All we need is people to open up their protocols and become more interoperability-minded. (is that a word?). </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478420</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Web 4.0, Another Definition.</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478403</link>
<description>I think the Web x.0 versions don&amp;#039;t necessarily come sequentially. Even web 2.0 isn&amp;#039;t all that fab since semantic interoperability (web3.0) isn&amp;#039;t really there yet.... Rather than sequence, It&amp;#039;s about different views that need each other to rise simultaneously. Oh, You&amp;#039;re way ahead of me when it comes to using phones... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478403</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Web 4.0, Another Definition.</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478385</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re right. Awareness is good. However, I hesitated to write this post because it contains an &amp;#039;expectation&amp;#039; that&amp;#039;s not yet very realistic, even though all technology needed allready exists... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478385</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Web 4.0, Another Definition.</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478373</link>
<description>IPv6 is on my wishlist to implement at home. However. There is a simple reason why hardly anyone is adopting it. There&amp;#039;s no real need yet. Even though the number of free IP4 addresses are decreasing fast, everyone is happy with NATting. Most of these home-automation systems would work perfectly behind NATted firewalls. The real IPv6 growth will come from the upcoming economies in Asia. With the start of the internet, the developed world of the time (USA and Europe) were pretty generous to themselves when handing out IP-ranges.....  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478373</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Web 4.0, Another Definition.</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478352</link>
<description>Thanks! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478352</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Web 4.0, Another Definition.</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478350</link>
<description>Thanks for the reply, I don&amp;#039;t think wifi would be the right tech for this. It lacks range and the handshake takes too long, you&amp;#039;ld be allready home. And why make it so complicated? All it takes is a GPS (which is in your navigation or phone anyways) and you know where you are... If you come within a certain range, run any script you like.... Cheers </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jan 2009 12:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=122#IDComment13478350</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Willem&#039;s Personal Blog : Dataportability: a Comment I Made...</title>
<link>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=87#IDComment12304094</link>
<description>Sure I agree. Dataportability exceeds authentication. My point is that I don&amp;#039;t (yet?) see how FC actually brings sufficient DP. Sure OpenID doesnot do that yet. So far all these initiatives take the &amp;#039;easy route&amp;#039; by creating a Single-Signon-like solution to authentication but don&amp;#039;t do any real dataportability. I think that&amp;#039;s a chance missed...  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://willemkossen.nl/b/?p=87#IDComment12304094</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>